1. Improbus says:

    @Alfred1

    Spoken like a true Christian.

  2. Alfred1 says:

    The cop should be exonerated…she was under arrest and disobeyed lawful commands…if she wanted to dispute the charges, courts exist for that purpose.

    She confirms the fact she was under arrest when she was tasered for disobedience…at 4:48 saying “I don’t know remember if he said I was under arrest” and almost immediately, in 5:06 says “he wanted to arrest me”

    While we all hate getting tickets, especially those we are innocent of, once under arrest, you gotta submit…or else.

  3. Alfred1 says:

    #21 Its concerning our Police Officer’s do not have effective tasers…that could cause loss of their life.

    And loss of citizen life, if police then resort to more lethal means.

  4. SparkyOne says:

    #16 clio,
    The stop was lost when the “officer” allowed the driver to exit the auto.

    This is a training issue and if the “officer” had ever had control of the situation none of this would have happened.

  5. Alfred1 says:

    The benefit of any doubt must go to the Police Officer…while hind sight might suggest other levels of force…in reality, police officers don’t have that benefit…they must make instant decisions…therefore they must be given wide latitude…

    She was under arrest…and chose to resist arrest, that clinches it.

  6. Gern Blanston says:

    Talking on a Cell phone while driving / speeding with kids in the car should be a $10,000 fine AND the cop should be required to Taser the driver… three times.

  7. Delta Dan says:

    Why one side of the story Dave? how many years did you work for the national enquirer? You are the problem and not the solution, like a politician.

  8. R.O.P. says:

    Nothing like showing your kids you love them by putting their lives at risk. Still, if the penalty for stupidity is getting tasered, the cops are going to need more batteries. I really wonder what the civil rights movement would have looked liked if tasers were in use in the 60′s.

  9. Olo Baggins of Bywater says:

    #26….if you also have to taser the kids then they’ll make sure mom isn’t on the phone or speeding.

  10. ArianeB says:

    Using Tasers should be considered LETHAL FORCE and should NEVER be used unless someone’s life in danger.

  11. chuck says:

    I don’t think using a taser is an appropriate method for attempting to arrest someone.

    Is shooting someone appropriate? If a police officer shoots someone in self-defense, it’s allowed. But if the officer said, “well I wanted to arrest the person, so I shot them” – then the officer would probably be fired and should also be charged.

    Is hitting someone with a club appropriate? Again, if the officer uses their night-stick (club) in self-defense, then it’s allowed. But beating someone over the head in order to arrest them is usually not allowed.

    The police are trained in various methods to physically restrain people who are resisting arrest. I didn’t see any resistance in this video. I think police just like to use tasers because it gives them an easy method to apply violent force against a person, without any messy contact.

  12. Alfred1 says:

    #31 I could be wrong, not being expert in this, but I believe the argument is Tasering is less damaging, less life threatening, than physically beating her to enforce compliance.

    That argument seems to have some validity to me.

    To assume she is physically strong enough to withstand bodily force is an assumption that will, given the presence of frail humans in our midst, will prove unsound.

  13. atmusky says:

    Cops primary function is to generate revenue and to protect the established power structure.

    This tasering is bullshit and for all you nitwits that think cops are here to protect you or prevent crime I hope you are the cops next victim.

    If you want to protection buy a shot gun. If you want less crime stop politicians from passing bullshit laws that do nothing but impose someones views on others.

  14. Alfred1 says:

    #33 Naive…anyone familiar with the lawless realizes how much society requires protection from them…how grateful we should be for law enforcement.

    Anarchy had its chance, in the wild west. In time communities realized men are more free when a lawman allows peaceful commerce to exist without extortion and theft.

  15. Chriswsm says:

    Using a mobile phone when driving is banned in the UK as is it proven to be more dangerous than drunk driving. £60 fine (roughly $100) and 3 points on licence (12 points = ban) if you are caught being that stupid. Sadly thicko drivers still do it all the time and a little girl was badly hurt near where I live a few months back, the bloke that ran her over was using a phone and didn’t see that she was on the pedestrian crossing. I hope they throw the book at him.

    The officer should have got her on tape stating that she was not using her phone. Then inspected her phone and if she was not being truthful she loses her driving licence for life.

    Perhaps tasering is getting out of hand but what are the alternatives? Shoot them? UK officers have tasers but rarely use them unless they are up against an armed foe.

  16. atmusky says:

    #34Naive? Perhaps you should look in the mirror. This cop wasn’t protecting anyone – he was attempting to generate revenue and was pissed when he wasn’t going to be able to so.

    I live in upstate/western NY and for all practicable purposes it is a police state. I have had family members pulled over for this same issue they also were not using a cell phone and didn’t even have one in the car. They were detained for over an hour while their car was ripped apart looking for the cell phone. Bad cops are everywhere, every week another town has some cop in hot water heck the last 3 police chiefs in the next town over all were arrested while in office.

    Most cops are tasked with collecting money for the state the majority of the time. Not to mention the fact that if we got rid of the prostitution, gambling, & drug laws we wouldn’t have any crime to speak of.

    So do I support having police to actually protect people or their property – sure do. But that is not what our current police state is about.

  17. KMFIX says:

    Looks justified to me. Never be a threat to an officer. They will protect themselves.

  18. Inbread Georgian says:

    She looks like a cranky bitch, I would have tased her too. Speeding, talking on the cell phone with kids in the car? He should have kicked her in the crotch as well. If she had been in Georgia she would have been thrown on the hood of the police car and it would have looked like a scene from Deliverance.

  19. Poppa Boner says:

    #32 – Alf, you are always wrong.

  20. Bad Ass Texan says:

    #38 Inbread Georgian,

    “I would have tased her too.

    If you tased any member of my family, it would be the last act as any kind of pubic service you ever perform.

    I promise you, you’d never work again and we would own you for three generations.

    To protect and to serve: MY ASS.



Bad Behavior has blocked 25751 access attempts in the last 7 days.