WASHINGTON – Talk-show host Sean Hannity, a vocal opponent of Barack Obama’s policies, said today he would not rule out a bid for the presidency in 2012. Egged on by radio colleague Bill Cunningham, Hannity said he would consider entering the front lines of the political fray if God directs him. “I’ve never made a decision in my life without – whatever destiny God has you’ve got to fulfill it,” he said. “I’m not sure that’s my destiny.” Hannity would make a formidable candidate, with the likability of Reagan, good looks and strong convictions. He’s also a polished communicator and knows the issues inside out.
And he can debate.
Hannity hosts the second-largest radio program in America, after Rush Limbaugh, and a highly rated nightly TV show on the Fox News Channel. While Obama’s approval ratings have been plummeting in his first year in office, no clear Republican frontrunner has emerged. The candidates most often considered viable include Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin and Hannity’s Fox News colleague Mike Huckabee. Cunningham, one of Hannity’s guests during a visit to Cincinnati today, said the nation and the Republican Party need Hannity.
Later in the program, a member of the audience asked what the host thought of a Hannity-Palin ticket.
The studio audience erupted in applause.
Hannity asked: “Would any of you really want me to run?”
Loud applause followed.
This proves God is a Republican…..and that Sean has a thing for loose women.
Hannity could hardly do any worse than the arrogant creature now taking up space in the oval office. I mean how many blunders can one guy commit.
Until now I didn’t think it possible, but Obama actually makes Jimmy Carter look competent. I mean it’s not like Obama is setting the bar high for Hannity or anyone else.
Dr Dodd, please give us examples of the tangible blunders done by Obama. Cash for Clunkers maybe? Thank you.
Isn’t that the guy who got caught in a public toilet with a young boy? – oh it’s the republicans, ofcourse they’ll let him run – he’s one of them.
#15
“Ann has a nice set, doesn’t she???”
Of what, testicles? She has a bigger Adams apple than Tarzan!
Oh please Sean Insannity, go for it you sub-microbial D-bag. It would be funny to see what skeletons come flying out of your closet. My guess is his skeletons have Adams apples like Ann.
#21 I’m not a fan of Obama, to me they are all paid liars. But NOTHING could be worse than the retarded buttnugget that just spent 8 years screwing things up more than one could imagine. Oh wait, maybe if Palin got in, yeah – that would be worse. She can’t even speak proper English let alone construct a proper sentence out of it.
I hope to God he runs. Please, please run Sean! He’s one of the stupidest people on television — and that’s saying something.
If Sean gets the ticket, it’s a guaranteed democratic win.
# 21 Dr Dodd is such a mental dud. Like so many RePUCKaTons, so young yet so senile.
Sean sure knows how to play the crowd.
Of course he won’t run, he’s making far too much money and has far too much influence with none of the accountability!
#19, noname
-um…do you not know how to read or know
the meaning of innuendo?
in case you haven’t noticed, *rational* thought has not existed in this country, especially in our federal government, in over a century.
besides, it’s a non-issue. if you dig deep
into history (as well as symbology) you’ll
find it there, plain as day.
as for “my god” -lucky for me, my parents
allowed me to come to my own conclusions.
i was never so foolish as to believe in such
a construct.
-it is quite plain to see that
both, republican and democratic parties
are metaphors for good and evil depending
on which side you got suckered into joining.
their sole purpose (esp now) has been to confuse and deceive us, -to keep us from ever
seeing the “whole picture”
if your so naive as to still believe only one party is responsible for the moral and economic collapse of our country, well..i guess you’ll just have to learn the hard way.
-s
I’d like to do some introductions, being a social organiser.
Alfred1, I’d like you to meet another of your fact-free friends (must be a good diet).
Dr Dodd, I’d like to introduce to you Alfred1, he’s one of most quotable commenters.
I think you two would enjoy many things, especially comparing your IQs before watching FOX and after watching FOX.
Can we (I’ll organize the science) get you two together to get that DNA analyzed?
Please don’t be like the coward Sean Hannity (called the coward) and not take your stance seriously.
Thanks!
# 28 soundwash
Your writing is all about innuendo.
For example you write,
“given no other choice, i much prefer repub/conservative types running the country”
That’s a B.S. way of saying, there are no other choices.
So, you have plainly declared and shown your biases, despite your feigning protestations.
Your other writings:
“democratic party is a just branch of the socialist party which imo, was designed to destroy America and her Liberty from within”
then with the above “imo” you write a very hypocritical statement:
“your so naive as to still believe only one party is responsible for the moral and economic collapse of our country”
Which is it? Your writing is typical double speak, pre-senile, Non Rational, RePUCKaTon thinking.
Crap. After reading my last post I realized that Sean Hannity can easily slither away from doing anything.
If he addressed anything relevant with facts head on I’d probably listen to him.
So….he’s still the coward the world knows him as. Coward!
Sean, when you wake up every morning, think about us who know you are a coward.
Just what w need. A Lou Costello clone as President.
You know, Cash for Clunkers has had it problems.
1) only 2% of the reimbursements have been paid leaving many dealers in deeper financial trouble
2) charities have been hurt by it
3)no one thought to protect US car makers so most of the profits are going to Toyota
Hmmm. Can we get back to the Kleinfelter’s Syndrome discussion?
Right is Wrong – #33. Prove with numbers and facts that your statements about the program is a failure.
Tic tok…..tic tok….
#26 noname – please use the current & proper phrase to give acknowledgment to the political party you sought to defame.
The current correct phrase is Repugnicunts.
Thank you.
# 37 Gawdmachine, I am sorry, I am a bit hard of hearing, what did you say?
…the current correct phrase is
RePUCKaTons
RePRICKaTons
RePANZiSchemeTons
RePOOPaTons
RePHLAT-HEADaTons
RePHAGGoTons
……
Hmmm, Hannity/Coulter vs Palin/Bachman — now _that_ would be a primary season to watch!
Given how Cowboy Reagan’s unpredictability scared other countries, imagine the skyrocketing sales of Tums (and ABM systems and tunneling machines) if Coulter gets anywhere within a mile of The Button….
Perhaps his god will tell him to stand in front of a fast moving train. One can only hope!