noname says:

Look Ma, no modesty!

Jägermeister says:

Awesome site, hhopper! Thanks.

Steve says:

That’s hot !!!

Privacy says:

Bunch of worthless idiots rinning that website. I can’t wait to see their sorry asses get so sued for violating all sorts of privacy issues. When you go shopping inside a store that is not considered “in public” in the legal sense of controlling your image and likeness, there is an expectation of privacy. Just ask any Hollywood lawyer, they would never do what these idiots are doing on this peopleofwalmart website. You can’t go into stores and start taking pictures of anyone you want and publicize them without their express written permission or you can be sued. Even on the street in public you risk lawsuits. There are some rare exceptions as in the case of breaking news where in the public interest the story has to get out as quick as possible and where in certain times like at a fire, as they cnanot possibly get releases for everyone that would appear in the frame as they are covering a building fire, and again, it’s because in the greater public interest of covering the fire as an immediate public safety threat. Most people know you cannot go take a photo of someone in a dressing room and post it online, there is this thing called “right to non-publicity” for those who are not in the public eye. Wal-Mart may need to introduce a “no cameras or cell phones allowed anywhere in the store” policy that is well posted for everyone to see prior to coming in, and use surveillance to catch and prosecute people who get their jollies by posting those images online ILLEGALLY.

Postman says:

Well this is all good fun if you don’t live in a Wallmart impact area, where Wallmart has driven every other retailer out of business and you really have no choice but to shop at Wallmart now. It is a little late to go on with the public humiliation now that our economy has contracted to the point that it supports exactly one general merchandise retailer… I mean, I guess my other options are Lowes, Best Buy and Target (the high end of the low end general merchandise retailer???) and that is about it.

Oh well…

steve says:

I think this is a perfect example of why america should have public caneing(spell) why do i have to be exposed to these idiots the only thing lower than there pants is there IQ-they have none.

Scott H says:

#1 My bemusement long since gave way to amusement. A more hapless “style” I can’t imagine.

Special Ed says:

Uh oh, #8 sounds like a Wal-Mart, electric cart driving fat ass.

Faxon says:

#8 I disagree. I work for a major network as a news photographer. Anybody in a public place has NO expectation of privacy, and CAN be photographed. Now, the issue here is Walmart, and whether they permit photography inside their stores. I doubt that they do. So they can cause a problem for the web site owners. However, the people, being in public, have NO expectation of privacy. Don’t you think WALMART has cameras on them the entire time they are in the store? You are trying to argue for privacy, but there can be none expected in public places. You lose. Any of these people could, of course, legally be photographed on the sidewalk, and there is nothing anyone can do about it. There is an argument about it when it comes to photos used commercial reproduction, but not for news. A blog is considered news, pal. So it is only Walmart who can complain, not the people in the pictures. Of course, I wouldn’t want to have to explain all of this to any of the freaks in the pictures…I hear this crap all the time as I do my job and get tired of hearing it. Bottom line, in public, fair game.