The Washington Post is typically the main-stream-media copy-press-release type of newspaper, but today one of their editors asked this fine question on an op-ed:
Would a Nobel peace prize winner authorize an attack on Iran?
Maybe Obama getting the Nobel peace prize is just a way to stop him from invading Iran.
Who could be behind this?
Iran is perhaps the most vexing challenge. Some progress toward a negotiated solution was made last week in Geneva, but it is too early to tell whether that will be sustainable. The diplomatic efforts may fail, forcing the president to consider sanctions that may bring suffering to the Iranian people. Ultimately, he may find on his desk a Pentagon proposal for a military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. Or he may get a call from an Israeli prime minister saying such a strike is imminent.
An attack on Iran may be in the U.S. interests. But is it something a Nobel peace prize winner would authorize?
#58 So your momma is out for the weekend night shift. How lucky are you! Too bad you only use the computer to be pwned by me.
#59 How cute. Huge Ripoff is helping the less fortunate muslim radical. I think that’s great. Specially since living down under, you make sure they don’t do anything to you. You’re brave.
#60 & FISA
#61 Pedro
“. Specially since living down under, you make sure they don’t do anything to you. ”
Yeah, that’s why I live in Australia, because I’m afraid of Muslims?
That’s possibly the douchiest thing you’ve said yet, and that’s a pretty big call.
Keep checking under your bed for Muslim radicals, socialists and liberals, mate. You KNOW they’re out to get you.
#61, ‘dro,
It sure looks like your daddy owns your booty. You just don’t have the wit to make a good comeback.
If someone were posting like that about me I think I might take the hint and quit trolling.
It is pretty funny though.
#59 Hugh Ripper,
Thanks for understanding my point. There are over 1 billion Muslims and you think they all hate America or the West? If they all did, then it would have been a disaster.
All we say, yes, if someone from us attacks you, then you have the right to get them and put them on trial. Not come to our lands and bomb every living and breathing soul in the name of war on terror.
The Muslim nations still see the West with admiration, its the small minority which dislikes anything related to West. But even within these small minorities are those who lost their families, friends in US carpet bombings and daisy cutters. Think how would you feel when someone bombs you home with all your family members inside? And if you take action against it, you are called an enemy combatant? I am not supporting the terrorists, Im just telling you the reason behind their hatred.
Yea, some of you will flame me to death but Im sure the sound minded will agree with me in one way or another.
God bless…
#63 Coming from the king of conFusion, constantly being pwned by others because he doesn’t get what others write, is quite the compliment.
Travis, read the whole speech.
“danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite”
Obama is covertly destroying America as we know it…using Alinsky’s deceptive methods…
He cannot change everything at once…we would all get suspicious…
So while he works on the domestic front, secretly subverting our free market and freedom of the press…he lets the wars go…
But as we see now with Afghanistan…he can’t restrain himself from these areas…he will surrender and retreat like the good leftist he is…when he sees an opening.