Comments on: The ‘Faked’ Oswald Photo Is Probably Real http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/ General interest observations and true web-log. Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:08:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: HTS http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599646 HTS Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:41:53 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599646 Regardless of what your theory is of the JFK assassination, there was obviously a government cover-up of the facts... and that is VERY disturbing. Regardless of what your theory is of the JFK assassination, there was obviously a government cover-up of the facts… and that is VERY disturbing.

]]> By: Winston http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599287 Winston Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:27:44 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599287 An expert, scientific photo analysis of that photo was done for a TV documentary (History or Discovery Channel) _YEARS_ ago and it reached the same conclusion. The photo is authentic. So, why is this news? An expert, scientific photo analysis of that photo was done for a TV documentary (History or Discovery Channel) _YEARS_ ago and it reached the same conclusion. The photo is authentic. So, why is this news?

]]> By: Danman http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599280 Danman Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:07:21 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599280 There were 2 photos of Oswald in the backyard holding the rifle. The head of Oswald in both photos is exactly the same which isn't that big of a deal since they were shot within seconds of each other. Except in one photo his head is tilted, BUT THE SHADOW UNDER HIS NOSE IS ALSO TILTED. Fake, end of discussion. Read more about it here: http://pimall.com/nais/news/backyard.html And it's not that hard for the people orchestrating the coverup of JFK's killing to find/hire an "expert" to dispel any notion of conspiracy. There were 2 photos of Oswald in the backyard holding the rifle. The head of Oswald in both photos is exactly the same which isn’t that big of a deal since they were shot within seconds of each other. Except in one photo his head is tilted, BUT THE SHADOW UNDER HIS NOSE IS ALSO TILTED. Fake, end of discussion.
Read more about it here:
http://pimall.com/nais/news/backyard.html

And it’s not that hard for the people orchestrating the coverup of JFK’s killing to find/hire an “expert” to dispel any notion of conspiracy.

]]> By: Uncle Patso http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599202 Uncle Patso Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:51:13 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599202 This is a form of mental illness, and it's much more advanced and widespread than I had thought. Go back on your meds, people! At least enough to quiet the voices... This is a form of mental illness, and it’s much more advanced and widespread than I had thought. Go back on your meds, people! At least enough to quiet the voices…

]]> By: Glenn E. http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599191 Glenn E. Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:21:22 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599191 I've seen all kinds of wacky theories of things like an umbrella gun, used by a bystander at street level. And the blurry image of someone maybe shooting from a fence on the Grassy Noll. One supposed expert even worked out how someone might have fired a rifle from down inside a street storm drain, as the car drove by. I very much doubt such ideas. Why would any pro risk getting seen or caught, in a crowded place? I’ve seen all kinds of wacky theories of things like an umbrella gun, used by a bystander at street level. And the blurry image of someone maybe shooting from a fence on the Grassy Noll. One supposed expert even worked out how someone might have fired a rifle from down inside a street storm drain, as the car drove by. I very much doubt such ideas. Why would any pro risk getting seen or caught, in a crowded place?

]]> By: Glenn E. http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599187 Glenn E. Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:57:55 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599187 Oswald only got employment at the Book Depository, because a Quaker woman living in Texas, help him and Russian wife get settled and the job. So to believe this was some kind of conspiracy, you'd have to believe that the Quakers are in on it too. Now really, Quakers?!! Also JFK chose the car he rode in, to be more visible to the crowds. When he could have ridden in something more bulletproof. The only real hint of any conspiracy was how little security was put in place around the plaza where the shooting occurred. And that the parade route was announced in advance. Oswald probably was wound up and sent after Kennedy, by underworld forces. But those who were responsible for protecting the president from nutjobs like Oswald, seem to have been leaving too many opportunities open. Almost as if they were hoping something would happen, to get Kennedy out of office. Perhaps to extend the Vietnam war, as many believed JFK was opposed to it. Back then, the FBI knew of at least one defense contractor using a stolen diary of reputed Kennedy mistress Judith Exner, to possibly influence his approval of a DOD contract. Blackmail? Make you wonder what other entities were counting on Kennedy's cooperation or his demise? Oswald only got employment at the Book Depository, because a Quaker woman living in Texas, help him and Russian wife get settled and the job. So to believe this was some kind of conspiracy, you’d have to believe that the Quakers are in on it too. Now really, Quakers?!!

Also JFK chose the car he rode in, to be more visible to the crowds. When he could have ridden in something more bulletproof.

The only real hint of any conspiracy was how little security was put in place around the plaza where the shooting occurred. And that the parade route was announced in advance. Oswald probably was wound up and sent after Kennedy, by underworld forces. But those who were responsible for protecting the president from nutjobs like Oswald, seem to have been leaving too many opportunities open. Almost as if they were hoping something would happen, to get Kennedy out of office. Perhaps to extend the Vietnam war, as many believed JFK was opposed to it.

Back then, the FBI knew of at least one defense contractor using a stolen diary of reputed Kennedy mistress Judith Exner, to possibly influence his approval of a DOD contract. Blackmail? Make you wonder what other entities were counting on Kennedy’s cooperation or his demise?

]]> By: Thomas http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599170 Thomas Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:29:38 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599170 #26 We certainly wouldn't want facts to get in the way of a good conspiracy. #26
We certainly wouldn’t want facts to get in the way of a good conspiracy.

]]> By: Animby http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599160 Animby Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:41:19 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599160 I love this conspiracy. Some of you are obviously consumed with it. I have only two words to add in rebuttal of the OP: Hany Farid I love this conspiracy. Some of you are obviously consumed with it.

I have only two words to add in rebuttal of the OP: Hany Farid

]]> By: Tech_1 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599152 Tech_1 Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:46:46 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599152 Thomas: Stop being such a plant: Gigs up fella. Thomas: Stop being such a plant: Gigs up fella.

]]> By: Thomas http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599146 Thomas Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:06:37 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599146 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle During the investigation by the House Select Committee on Assassinations (1976–1978), the lead attorneys for the Committee, Robert Blakey and Gary Cornwell, were allowed to use WC-139 at an FBI firing range. The attorneys wanted to see how fast the bolt action could be operated. Blakey was able to fire two rounds in 1.5 seconds and Cornwell fired two rounds in 1.2 seconds. This was an experiment to test a possible theory that Oswald in his excitement may have pointed and fired, as opposed to aimed and fired. Some critics of the Warren Commission had claimed it was impossible to fire a Carcano rifle in less than 2.3 seconds. Both the CBS and HSCA tests proved conclusively this claim is not accurate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle

During the investigation by the House Select Committee on Assassinations (1976–1978), the lead attorneys for the Committee, Robert Blakey and Gary Cornwell, were allowed to use WC-139 at an FBI firing range. The attorneys wanted to see how fast the bolt action could be operated. Blakey was able to fire two rounds in 1.5 seconds and Cornwell fired two rounds in 1.2 seconds. This was an experiment to test a possible theory that Oswald in his excitement may have pointed and fired, as opposed to aimed and fired. Some critics of the Warren Commission had claimed it was impossible to fire a Carcano rifle in less than 2.3 seconds. Both the CBS and HSCA tests proved conclusively this claim is not accurate.

]]> By: Thomas http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599145 Thomas Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:59:05 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599145 Got cut off. This is the rest of the thread discussing that YouTube video: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=14741 Got cut off. This is the rest of the thread discussing that YouTube video:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=14741

]]> By: Thomas http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599143 Thomas Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:55:22 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599143 #4 Nonsense. The evidence points to a single shooter. There are rumors that Oswald was aided by Castro but that still points to a single shooter. #9 I suspect it is a case of weaponry and tactics outpacing security for a brief moment in time. #14 You mean like this guy: http://youtube.com/watch?v=uy_T7D2-Y3o This guy fired seven shots in 6.8 seconds with the same rifle. #4
Nonsense. The evidence points to a single shooter. There are rumors that Oswald was aided by Castro but that still points to a single shooter.

#9
I suspect it is a case of weaponry and tactics outpacing security for a brief moment in time.

#14
You mean like this guy:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=uy_T7D2-Y3o

This guy fired seven shots in 6.8 seconds with the same rifle.

]]> By: CrankyGeeksFan http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599132 CrankyGeeksFan Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:11:18 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599132 Did Oswald shoot with his left hand or right hand? A Marine Corps sniper wrote that based on the location of the Texas School Book Depository window it would have been better if the sniper shot left-handed. Even If he was right-handed he still may have shot with his left. Did Oswald shoot with his left hand or right hand? A Marine Corps sniper wrote that based on the location of the Texas School Book Depository window it would have been better if the sniper shot left-handed. Even If he was right-handed he still may have shot with his left.

]]> By: LHO http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599115 LHO Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:17:55 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599115 #15. Look at the picture of E Howard Hunt and a picture of one of the three "tramps" arrested that day in Dallas. http://greatdreams.com/E_Howard_Hunt-tramp.jpg If someone admits to being involved in the murder, AND you can place him at the scene. The evidence is pretty damning..wouldn't you think? Or are you even capable of thought. By the way..one of the "tramps" is the father of actor Woody Harrelson. Who just recently died while serving a life sentence for murdering a Federal Judge in Texas. These were not tramps. #15. Look at the picture of E Howard Hunt and a picture of one of the three “tramps” arrested that day in Dallas.

http://greatdreams.com/E_Howard_Hunt-tramp.jpg

If someone admits to being involved in the murder, AND you can place him at the scene. The evidence is pretty damning..wouldn’t you think? Or are you even capable of thought.

By the way..one of the “tramps” is the father of actor Woody Harrelson. Who just recently died while serving a life sentence for murdering a Federal Judge in Texas. These were not tramps.

]]> By: Peter L. Winkler http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/08/the-oswald-photo-is-probably-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1599108 Peter L. Winkler Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:17:10 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=62292#comment-1599108 Marina Oswald took the backyard photos. She told the Warren Commission and has never recanted her statement. After Oswald was in police custody, Marina and Marguerite Oswald went through Lee's personal posessions and found a print of one of the photos. They burned it in an ashtray and flushed the ashes. Obviously, the photo was authentic and highly incriminating, otherwise they wouldn't have destroyed it. Oswald also wrote an inscripion in Russian on the back of a print of the photo and sent it to George De Morenschildt. Marina Oswald took the backyard photos. She told the Warren Commission and has never recanted her statement. After Oswald was in police custody, Marina and Marguerite Oswald went through Lee’s personal posessions and found a print of one of the photos. They burned it in an ashtray and flushed the ashes. Obviously, the photo was authentic and highly incriminating, otherwise they wouldn’t have destroyed it.

Oswald also wrote an inscripion in Russian on the back of a print of the photo and sent it to George De Morenschildt.

]]>