Comments on: Fact Checking Sarah Palin — By Fox News!

By: Buzz

Buzz — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:03:53 +0000

Oh, lordy. Next they’ll be fact-checking Dvorak.

By: deowll

deowll — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:06:12 +0000

#24 The one they reader happens to believe in.

The bigger question is will anyone use these coins. The most likely answer is no.

I have a couple of metal dollars stashed somewhere but don’t spend them in fact I normally put everything I can on plastic which is paid off at the end of the month.

By: m.c. in l.v.

m.c. in l.v. — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:14:27 +0000

Which god?

By: Poppa Boner

Poppa Boner — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:51:51 +0000

I’d hit it!

By: right

right — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:17:53 +0000

And don’t forget there are some here who think Palin will win the Presidency in a landslide in 2012. Weeeee….

By: Troublemaker

Troublemaker — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:10:58 +0000

Frightening that this buffoon could have been our Vice President.

Then again, we had 8 years of a similar buffoon as President and survived… kinda.

By: Dallas

Dallas — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:41:29 +0000

Oh please. This is a lame attempt to snooker the Fox sheeple they actually are watching a fact checking medium.

I don’t watch that shit. Is O’Really still foaming there?

By: Bastian

Bastian — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:15:23 +0000

Who are we all kidding… there is nothing more secular than money. Take anything and everything referring to God off our currency; instead, put “ In Goldman Sachs we trust” just to be very clear about it.

By: srgothard

srgothard — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:59:49 +0000

So she didn’t say that it was Obama’s administration, but she may have implied it. So we fact check what people didn’t say but may have meant now??

By: qb

qb — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:32:11 +0000

Who’s Sarah Palin?

By: dcphill

dcphill — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:59:12 +0000

Yet another excersize in trivial persuit.
Sarah Palin’s uterances are trivial.
Why do we persue this crap?

By: badtimes

badtimes — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:46:47 +0000

C’mon, a Rasmussen poll? Haven’t we been through this already? Rasmussen always skews Republican. They are a consistent outlier.

By: bobbo, libertarianism fails when it becomes dogma

bobbo, libertarianism fails when it becomes dogma — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:46:43 +0000

#9–Warden==yep, does look like brain rot is setting in. You do know what “WAG” stands for??? It means the subject is too irrelevant to invest any time in.

Nice rap on Faux Spews as well. Its fair and balanced for them to do the work up and report on Palin but bad form for anyone else, including a general interest aggregation blog like this one, to report it????

Haw, haw. Talk about wheels off. Sad to see someone without talking points to tether themselves to something with at least some internal consistency.

By: Olo Baggins of Bywater

Olo Baggins of Bywater — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:37:41 +0000

Warden, you need to turn off Fox and get your news elsewhere…it’s rotting your logic ability.

—btw running Win 7 on an old Dell D600. Works quite well. Very well, in fact.

By: The0ne

The0ne — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:28:31 +0000

#7
I still can’t understand WTF Palin is talking about most of the time. It’s all gibberish and stupid talk. When she can properly put sentences together, I’ll begin to listen again. Until then, someone PLEASE remove the foot in her mouth dammit!