Comments on: Bill Clinton in Chicago pitches health care; muses on “Mad Men”

By: Angry

Angry — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:17:19 +0000

#8 Actually, I was trying to be mildly suggestive because Hillary is teh hotness.

So I was being sexist but not for the reason you think. Way to be prejudiced toward my question!

Wretched Gnu — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:16:33 +0000

Angry writes, “What would it take to turn that frown upside down?”

Which is exactly the question you would be asking of a photo of a pensive man, right?

But I keep forgetting — women are obliged to wear a continual look of glee to soothe the hearts of men looking on.

Mr. Fusion — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:58:49 +0000

#6, Semantics,

Are you so stooopid you don’t think Dvorak’s audience knows the difference?

I think you’re new here.

Semantics — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:29:25 +0000

Is John C Dvorak so stupid he doesn’t know the difference between Bill and Hillary Clinton?

Mr. Fusion — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:37:18 +0000

No wonder the right wing nuts hate Clinton. He is out to destroy their world.

pedro is retarded — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:39:52 +0000

No matter what the story is we know this:

pedro is retarded.

He is the product of two morons who bred and created an idiot spawn that should have been killed at birth.

AdmFubar — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:51:12 +0000

ok but why is there a picture of hillary?? and one that is photoshlepped at that..
:-”

Eric — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:43:45 +0000

“The way women were treated is appalling”

…Talk about calling the pot calling the kettle black. I wonder what Jennifer Flowers thinks of the program?

Angry — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:27:55 +0000

What would it take to turn that frown upside down?