<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Secretary of State seeks sweeping internet copyright protection powers by stealth amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:43:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deowll</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1603470</link>
		<dc:creator>deowll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=63338#comment-1603470</guid>
		<description>What the man means is I have been offered a major bribe to sell out the people of the UK and I can&#039;t wait to cash the check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the man means is I have been offered a major bribe to sell out the people of the UK and I can&#8217;t wait to cash the check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn E.</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1603400</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=63338#comment-1603400</guid>
		<description>I was thinking of buying a few DVDs for Christmas presents this year. But now I&#039;m thinking, &quot;screw the MPAA, I&#039;ll stick to things not copyrighted by mega corporations&quot;. Probably a lot less costly, anyway. And they can blame piracy for yet more sales losses. Rather than millions of people being out of work, that weren&#039;t the year before.

As for movies, I wouldn&#039;t even bother to pirate 99.9% of what&#039;s made today. And much of it, isn&#039;t exactly what you could call an original idea. Like, how many vampire and werewolf stories have there been, so far? Or how many world disaster movies? Come on! If it hasn&#039;t been Meteors, or Glaciers, or evil Aliens, or earthquakes, or something. It&#039;s been a combination of two or more of these. Forget piracy. The industry plagiarizes and steals from itself. Oh, but I guess that&#039;s Ok. As long as the producers and directors are all old buddies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking of buying a few DVDs for Christmas presents this year. But now I&#8217;m thinking, &#8220;screw the MPAA, I&#8217;ll stick to things not copyrighted by mega corporations&#8221;. Probably a lot less costly, anyway. And they can blame piracy for yet more sales losses. Rather than millions of people being out of work, that weren&#8217;t the year before.</p>
<p>As for movies, I wouldn&#8217;t even bother to pirate 99.9% of what&#8217;s made today. And much of it, isn&#8217;t exactly what you could call an original idea. Like, how many vampire and werewolf stories have there been, so far? Or how many world disaster movies? Come on! If it hasn&#8217;t been Meteors, or Glaciers, or evil Aliens, or earthquakes, or something. It&#8217;s been a combination of two or more of these. Forget piracy. The industry plagiarizes and steals from itself. Oh, but I guess that&#8217;s Ok. As long as the producers and directors are all old buddies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1603307</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=63338#comment-1603307</guid>
		<description>@pben
The government agrees to uphold it in return for a copy of the work being placed in a copyright library (British Library, U Cambridge, U Oxford).

The reason is that a copy of the copyrighted work, such as the source code for Windows7 and a DVD of &quot;Debbie does Dallas&quot; is available for scholars to study for the good of the nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pben<br />
The government agrees to uphold it in return for a copy of the work being placed in a copyright library (British Library, U Cambridge, U Oxford).</p>
<p>The reason is that a copy of the copyrighted work, such as the source code for Windows7 and a DVD of &#8220;Debbie does Dallas&#8221; is available for scholars to study for the good of the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pben</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1603208</link>
		<dc:creator>pben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=63338#comment-1603208</guid>
		<description>Copyright was suppose to be a private monopoly.  The person who got it was suppose to enforce it.  So if governments and ISPs are getting getting in on the enforcement do they get a bigger cut of the revenue?  If copyright owners are outsourcing their responsibility they should also give away part of the profits to the ones enforcing their responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copyright was suppose to be a private monopoly.  The person who got it was suppose to enforce it.  So if governments and ISPs are getting getting in on the enforcement do they get a bigger cut of the revenue?  If copyright owners are outsourcing their responsibility they should also give away part of the profits to the ones enforcing their responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikapuza89</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1603202</link>
		<dc:creator>ikapuza89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=63338#comment-1603202</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected, I thought it was still John Prescott. Embarrassing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected, I thought it was still John Prescott. Embarrassing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honeyman</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1603198</link>
		<dc:creator>honeyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=63338#comment-1603198</guid>
		<description>#4 ikapuza89

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Mandelson&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;He&#039;s both&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 ikapuza89</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Mandelson" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">He&#8217;s both</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikapuza89</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1603196</link>
		<dc:creator>ikapuza89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=63338#comment-1603196</guid>
		<description>Lord Mandelson is the business secretary not secretary of state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lord Mandelson is the business secretary not secretary of state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troublemaker</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1603161</link>
		<dc:creator>Troublemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=63338#comment-1603161</guid>
		<description>http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/11/19/help-eff-save-web-content-prove-podcasting-and-media-patent-is-wrong/#more-8394

Patenting the use of all episodic media on the Web might sound absurd, but the US Patent and Trademark Office has granted just such a patent, to a company called VoloMedia. It’s a significant issue, one that could threaten the freedom of all media distribution online. Wherever you are in the world, you can help.

-----

The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s patent-busting project aims to take down unfair patents that threaten common-sense uses of technology. A number of these have applied to music and audio. The EFF has already won a big victory against what had been the worst offender – media giant Clear Channel actually successfully patented recording live shows. (No, really — recording a live gig, then burning them on the spot. The EFF was able to bust that patent.) The advocacy group also scored significant victories against patents on sending and receiving online streams and encoding media. (If someone thought they could patent your ears and charge you royalties for hearing, they probably would.)

-----

VoloMedia’s Bogus Patent – And Why It’s Dangerous

VoloMedia has been granted a patent for “providing episodic media.” The patent is broad enough to endanger any independent podcast or episodic media producer. Over the summer, Volomedia’s own Murgesh Navar sidestepped concerns about patent abuse to brag on the company blog about just how broad that claim was – that even non-RSS-based episodic media belong to them:

-----

Aside from the “before the start of podcasting” lie – and I believe “lie” is the only accurate word – it’s the implied threat that should send a chill down the spine of anyone using the Internet. Make no mistake about it: VoloMedia wants anyone doing podcasting, via any mechanism, to work with them.

-----

Plain English translation: if what you’re doing with media has episodes, you owe VoloMedia.

If this patent were allowed to stand, and if VoloMedia were able to successfully enforce it, it would have a chilling effect on all Internet distribution. Regardless of the likelihood of their legal success, that underlies the fundamental problem with patent law – it has come completely unglued from reality. That alone ought to motivate people to fully document these issues and try to effect change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/11/19/help-eff-save-web-content-prove-podcasting-and-media-patent-is-wrong/#more-8394" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/11/19/help-eff-save-web-content-prove-podcasting-and-media-patent-is-wrong/#more-8394' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://createdigitalmusic.com/2009/11/19/help-eff-save-web-content-prove-podcasting-and-media-patent-is-wrong/#more-8394</a></p>
<p>Patenting the use of all episodic media on the Web might sound absurd, but the US Patent and Trademark Office has granted just such a patent, to a company called VoloMedia. It’s a significant issue, one that could threaten the freedom of all media distribution online. Wherever you are in the world, you can help.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s patent-busting project aims to take down unfair patents that threaten common-sense uses of technology. A number of these have applied to music and audio. The EFF has already won a big victory against what had been the worst offender – media giant Clear Channel actually successfully patented recording live shows. (No, really — recording a live gig, then burning them on the spot. The EFF was able to bust that patent.) The advocacy group also scored significant victories against patents on sending and receiving online streams and encoding media. (If someone thought they could patent your ears and charge you royalties for hearing, they probably would.)</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>VoloMedia’s Bogus Patent – And Why It’s Dangerous</p>
<p>VoloMedia has been granted a patent for “providing episodic media.” The patent is broad enough to endanger any independent podcast or episodic media producer. Over the summer, Volomedia’s own Murgesh Navar sidestepped concerns about patent abuse to brag on the company blog about just how broad that claim was – that even non-RSS-based episodic media belong to them:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Aside from the “before the start of podcasting” lie – and I believe “lie” is the only accurate word – it’s the implied threat that should send a chill down the spine of anyone using the Internet. Make no mistake about it: VoloMedia wants anyone doing podcasting, via any mechanism, to work with them.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Plain English translation: if what you’re doing with media has episodes, you owe VoloMedia.</p>
<p>If this patent were allowed to stand, and if VoloMedia were able to successfully enforce it, it would have a chilling effect on all Internet distribution. Regardless of the likelihood of their legal success, that underlies the fundamental problem with patent law – it has come completely unglued from reality. That alone ought to motivate people to fully document these issues and try to effect change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Patso</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1603159</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Patso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=63338#comment-1603159</guid>
		<description>More copyright insanity. Next they&#039;ll be saying &quot;You&#039;d better not be singing copyrighted songs in the shower, either!&quot;

For more copyright insanity, check out the story about &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://consumerist.com/5407746/walmart-wont-let-family-print-photos-of-dead-relative-for-funeral?skyline=true&amp;s=x&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Walmart Won&#039;t Let Family Print Photos Of Dead Relative For Funeral&lt;/a&gt;&quot;

&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 14px; font-family: arial, helvetica; color:#3333FF&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;[unbelieveable - ed.]&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More copyright insanity. Next they&#8217;ll be saying &#8220;You&#8217;d better not be singing copyrighted songs in the shower, either!&#8221;</p>
<p>For more copyright insanity, check out the story about &#8220;<a href="http://consumerist.com/5407746/walmart-wont-let-family-print-photos-of-dead-relative-for-funeral?skyline=true&amp;s=x" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Walmart Won&#8217;t Let Family Print Photos Of Dead Relative For Funeral</a>&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: arial, helvetica; color:#3333FF"><i><b>[unbelieveable - ed.]</b></i></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OvenMaster</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/11/19/uk-secretary-of-state-seeks-sweeping-internet-copyright-protection-powers-by-stealth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1603152</link>
		<dc:creator>OvenMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=63338#comment-1603152</guid>
		<description>I have a novel idea: why not just enforce the laws that already exist? Heaven knows that there are enough of them.

If they &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; enforce every single copyright law, the Internet would be a very, very empty -- and boring -- place. Then again, that&#039;s probably the goal, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a novel idea: why not just enforce the laws that already exist? Heaven knows that there are enough of them.</p>
<p>If they <i>did</i> enforce every single copyright law, the Internet would be a very, very empty &#8212; and boring &#8212; place. Then again, that&#8217;s probably the goal, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

