|
This Episode’s Executive Producer: Laurence Roik Direct link to show here. Direct link to Donation Page. |
|
This Episode’s Executive Producer: Laurence Roik Direct link to show here. Direct link to Donation Page. |
Bad Behavior has blocked 25994 access attempts in the last 7 days.
It’s pretty complicated. What if it is a real threat and we don’t nuke it just because a bunch of scum are trying to make billions off a phoney-balony cap and trade scheme? They are in the way of progress, and may go the way of the Dodo for all I care.
19, The mere act of you exhaling contributes to “pollution”. You could argue that China’s one-child policy is good for the environment since there’s less people exhaling CO2. Should Obama propose a one child pollicy and heavily tax people who have “too many” children?
Yes, CO2 performs as a heat shield because it’s a green house gas. Guess what? Water vapor is a green house gas too. Should we try to control water vapor levels as well?
As a skeptic, I have not seen anything that scientifically proves CO2 is the cause of global warming / climate change or whatever the new political flavor of the day is. Does that mean I’m opposed to conservation? Nope. I just see no reason to use the force of government onto people just to make some political environmentalists happy before all the facts are in.
#19 Mr. Fusion said:
“So, as a denier you are positing that CO2 is not a pollutant?”
No, it’s plant food. They need it to make oxygen. And knock it off with the “denier” horse shit. I’ll posit that a lot of Holocaust survivors get more than a little pissed off with people like you bastardizing the term.
The models are flawed, the way the data is presented is dishonest at best. Fraudulent at the worst. Passing that off as science is about as valid as claiming the same for cold fusion.
“Dissolved in rainwater, it becomes acidic and erodes our buildings.”
And under pressure combined with tap water and mixed with vodka makes a nice drink. Volcanos and rotting trees make a hell of a lot more of it than we do.
For the skeptics, what do you thing will happen if this continues?
http://tinyurl.com/2gy3f8
24, What are you concluding from what you’re presenting? Is it causal? Is it correlation?
just spotted the new NA cast..
Thank you,Thank you,Thank you,Thank you,Thank you,Thank you,Thank you,Thank you,Thank you…
for finally providing the direct link to the mp3 again..
I’ll make a donation on Dec, 2nd..wont be much…but i appreciate the link…(i’m tapped out, trying to stock up before the crash..)
Many Thanks,
-gregO
as for all the “denier” talk..
I’ve been a lover of science and mechanics my whole life..it comes natural to me.
In 2007 i started to question *everything* i was every taught. as science news starting in 2002 mostly never added up..being stuck home during this time pretty much 26 days out of the month because of bone issues. i have spent almost 95% of that time doing research.
Not only did i confirm my long term suspicions of the man made issue (from 2004) but i learned that ALL of the science we are taught about how the climate works is grossly false.
–but the entire model of how the universe [planets, comets, you name it] works is a hoax of the grandest scale! -as is the true origins of humanity, the solar system, what was our original “sun” before we were captured by our current sun, Venus and a whole slew of other stuff.
a minor discovery, Venus was a comet..hows that for a shock. -and was most likely what fried Mars’s atmosphere..
-and so so much more.
You will all learn it very soon as events unfolding in the universe will no longer allow any of this to be suppressed.
The weather is electrically driven
-as is gravity. -and the model of the atom needs to be updated:
learn how simple gravity works.
Learn this stuff. it’s easy, and its the truth..and it will be common knowledge soon..
Stop parroting the political science and study the works of some 30 people, combine them and you will see how simple everything really is.
And for to know the “real science” of everything -Science and “Spirituality” MUST be combined as one body of work, One Science.
-something that i just figured out in the past year myself, -and still cant believe i didn’t see it 20 years ago..
until then, [my] -Mirror Image Rule applies..
-s
#23, nospam,
#19 Mr. Fusion said:
“So, as a denier you are positing that CO2 is not a pollutant?”
No, it’s plant food.
Oh, is it really? Well what happens when you put a plant in a pure CO2 atmosphere? Or feed your plant solid CO2? It dies.
Nitrogen is also plant food. Go ahead and dump some on your lawn. Not a little spread out, just dump it. The same as what dog shit does, it burns the grass and kills the roots. The same with phosphorus, copper, and every other nutrient plants (and animals) need to survive.
The point is too much of anything is not a good thing. You want to ignore that. We live in a narrow specific band of environmental concentrations. Too much of any or too little of any one item can and will effect how the living organisms survive.
Adding too much of anything to the environment becomes a pollutant.
28, Well said! Under the right circumstances anything natural can be labeled as a pollutant. Given enough spin and politics, we can make any naturally occurring item to be public enemy #1.
Sorta reminds me of The Sharper Image TV ads for their Ionic Breeze which talked about how their product puts out Ozone. Unfortunately O3 is called “ozone” when it’s in our atmosphere. When it’s down where we dwell it’s called smog.
#29, Guyver,
At surface level, ozone is indeed a pollutant. It is not, however, “smog”. Smog is the combination of particulate matter, ozone, CO2, and water vapor held close to the earth by a temperature inversion.
Phosphorus is another example. Long used as a laundry detergent additive, it was discovered to contribute to algae buildup so it was removed. Yup, phosphorus was declared a pollutant even though plants require it to grow.
Maybe you should stop and think before hitting the “Submit” button.