
The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN’s role in all future climate change negotiations.
The document is also being interpreted by developing countries as setting unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals.
The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as “the circle of commitment” – but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark – has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.
Found by Aric Mackey.












From: Obamaforever
To: Mr. Fusion
To: All anti-Climate Change Retards per #57
Mr. Fusion, I am afraid we are casting pearls before swine in trying to talk some sense into these imbeciles.
Your “self masturbation” phrase brings up a very interesting image. I am seeing an image of the Retards forming a circle jerk party. They are doing the dirty deed while reading the infamous hacked emails.
Pedro, you and Johnny can take turns being in the middle.
P.S. I have learned that pedro no longer has a goat. He has traded it in for a donkey. The donkey is not what he really wants because at this very moment he is collecting cans along the interstate to get his heart’s desire-a mule.
#61 You people are so mindless.
Quick question: Which political party has a donkey as mascot? That’s right (or shall I say left)
So, I’m quite honored to be shagging such beast. Better that than those sucking its balls.
You have been swiftly pwned. Not that that’s any news.
#61 BTW, you can also bring me an elephant if you want. I’ll do it too.
climate change is a redundancy – it always changes. we are in a period between ice ages – temperature will always rise and fall over a period of time.
the real issue is acceleration of change and there is not enough pre-historical data to make even decent stabs at a prediction. We could throw the 600b tarp funds at it and still not find a 2nd data set better than tree rings.
global warming is a marketing campaign which is not being fact checked by any scientist. anyone who questions data or scientific method with pundant is destined to live a worthless couple of minutes.
the days where most journalists even pretend to remove themselves from a story are long gone.
During the medieval warm period, when the Earth remained considerably warmer than it is today for a number of centuries, the world flourished like no other time before or since. Shortly after the warm period ended the bubonic plague wiped out about half of Europe’s population.
Coincidence or connection? You decide.
It’s funny, the only bought and paid for scientists are the ones promoting the great global warming hoax. You see, if a scientist didn’t support man caused global warming, then they couldn’t get the research grants, so, the majority of scientists actually do not have to pretend they believe in man caused global warming, because they are not being paid to do so, and therefore do not need to go through the elaborate theatrical process of having to fabricate supportive evidence via rigged studies and or doctored data.
It’s interesting to see how the Liberals evolve their agenda from “Man-Made Global Warming” to just “Global Warming” to now “Climate Change”.
What’s with the polemics? And if someone asks for some scientific proof to be persuaded, they’re somehow a “denier”?