The “inconvenient truth” overhanging the UN’s Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world.
A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.
The world’s other species, vegetation, resources, oceans, arable land, water supplies and atmosphere are being destroyed and pushed out of existence as a result of humanity’s soaring reproduction rate.
Ironically, China, despite its dirty coal plants, is the world’s leader in terms of fashioning policy to combat environmental degradation, thanks to its one-child-only edict.
The intelligence behind this is the following:
-If only one child per female was born as of now, the world’s population would drop from its current 6.5 billion to 5.5 billion by 2050, according to a study done for scientific academy Vienna Institute of Demography.
-By 2075, there would be 3.43 billion humans on the planet. This would have immediate positive effects on the world’s forests, other species, the oceans, atmospheric quality and living standards.
-Doing nothing, by contrast, will result in an unsustainable population of nine billion by 2050.
I’ve had three wives and only produced one child. Does that make me an ecologist?
By the way does no one else find the lady in the photograph to be a hypocrite? A good looking hypocrite but still …
#60 Yup, MikeN, that’s why you hear environmentalists praising the old Soviet Union and Communist China all the time. Not.
That was a particularly inspired bit of flaming wingnuttery… well done!
#24, re. Be fruitful and multiply: I think that’s actually an admonishment to get an adequate amount of fresh fruit every day, and learn your basic mathematical skills.
#24, re. Be fruitful and multiply: I always interpreted that as advice to get an adequate amount of fresh fruit every day, and practice my basic math skills.
Diane Francis is one of Canada’s most right wing commentators and has in the past promoted conservatives issues. She is far from being liberal.
Financial Post was form by Conrad Black, the one that is in jail now, as a voice for conservatives. There goal beyond finical new was was to actively use their position as a major media publication to promote conservative values and issues, i.e American style health care for Canada.
#62 Ah, denial. The core of the blog’s lefty loons.
Several countries in Europe have done this. The majority of their populations will be of middle eastern origins in less than 5O years and the natives will be in small minority status in 100.
Any population that does this is up for a Darwin award.
#66 little pedro, do you even read the messages before you vomit out your little tweets? Looks like you have your stock phrases you use over and over again. Beats thinking, I guess.
Do you want to give us some evidence that environmentalists have praised the Soviet Union and Communist China? Or are you just mentally masturbating, as usual?
57,
I hear Indian food is good.
63,
an old Chinese curse..
“May you live in interesting times”
say it all.
What is it about liberal/socialist that make them create a false crisis and to solve it someone has to be oppressed or die?
Some even get rewarded with a Noble Peace Prize.
#53 Pedrito. Appreciate you recognizing President Obama’s Nobel Prize. It’s an incredible achievement for such a young, but truly worldly president.
It must sadden you that Obama received an honorable award from a world leaders while Cheney has an arrest warrant in Vermont.
#71-Dallas-It’s an incredible achievement for such a young, but truly worldly president.
The real question is why does such an unworthy young and worldly person receive the Nobel unless it is a payoff for future service.
Gotta love it when a corrupt politician is openly paid off for betraying his country and they call it a prize.
Outside the scientific community, calls to address overpopulation often meet vigorous, ill-informed criticism and blatant hostility from both the left and right. Most of these sorts of objections are either obstinately ideological or stem from financial interests dependent on population growth for profit.
http://gpso.wordpress.com/
Global Population Speak Out
71, I don’t have a problem with the guy winning the award if he actually did something demonstrative to earn it.
Looks like the Europeans are playing the classic textbook American game of lowered standards for African Americans. If I were Obama, I’d be insulted for getting such a hand out. But then again Liberals have no problems with hand outs.
SNL Spoof of Obama winning the Nobel: http://tinyurl.com/ydrzl5d
#72 It’s a conspiracy, Dodd… a MASSIVE GLOBAL ONE-WORLD COMMUNO-FASCISTO-SOCIALISTIC CONSPIRACY TO ENSLAVE YOU AND ALL YOUR FELLOW RED-BLOODED AMERICANS!
Be afraid… be very afraid… wait… I think I hear them now… RUN!!!!!!
#73 Ya know, Guyver, it would have been perfectly reasonable to accuse the Europeans of sucking up to the new American president, in hopes of getting a better deal whenever they have to deal with him. If you’re of the wingnut mindset that sees Europeans as a bunch of pussies, I could see how you’d think that way.
But you had to throw race in there… hmmm… that says more about you than it does about Obama. Works that way with a lot of wingnuts, I’ve found. You just kinda exposed yourself there, dude. And perpetuated the stereotype that the Republican party is full of racists.
But hey, I bet some of your best friends are black, right? Riiiiiight…
75, Phydeau, My post in 73 was to bait, which you took. Go figure.
Unfortunately you’re jumping to a hasty conclusion since it seems you’re making assumptions about my ethnicity which you know nothing about. You’re not one of those Liberals who thinks Tiger Woods hates black people because he’s been dating white women are you?
Speaking of the Europeans, they are more concerned than ever about Middle Eastern relations since their own countries are experiencing an explosion of Muslim births in their country while the native population is having less children.
Back onto the topic of racism, what EXACTLY did I say that was “racist”? Rather than address the fact that I pointed out Obama didn’t actually demonstrate anything worthy of the reputation of the Nobel, you chose to play the race card like a typical Liberal. Go figure. I make a comment about one of the downsides to American culture in how the standards are lowered for Blacks (as though they’re not capable of at least being equal to everyone) and you took that as “racism”.
Thanks for proving you’re a partisan hack that only sees the world in shades of Democrat vs. Republican.
#76 Ah, the old “pretend my racist comment wasn’t really a racist comment but a trap for someone who pointed it out” trick. Nice.
FYI: people who bring a black person’s race into a conversation where it’s irrelevant are generally perceived as having a “thing” about race. Whether the Europeans are sucking up to Obama with the Nobel prize or not has nothing to do with his race.
You could have claimed the Europeans were kissing his ass without bringing in his race.
You could have expressed the opinion that he didn’t deserve the Nobel prize without bringing in his race.
But you didn’t. You played the “race card” by injecting his race into a topic where it was irrelevant. That shows you have a “thing” about race. Whether you realize it or not. I’m just calling it out.
FYI, Tiger Woods is, according to his wikipedia page, “one-quarter Chinese, one-quarter Thai, one-quarter African American, one-eighth Native American, and one-eighth Dutch”.
Thanks for proving you’re a partisan hack that only sees the world in shades of Democrat vs. Republican.
Oh dear… you’re not one of those cowardly Republicans who’s pretending not to be a Republican right now because the Republican party is in such a sh*thole, are you? Tsk tsk.
FWIW, I’m a liberal. There isn’t a political party that represents me. Maybe the Greens, if they weren’t so focused on the environment. Right now, the Democrats are the closest thing. And they’re not that close.
CO^2 rises and the “settled science” of global warming results in zealots – and flattening and even lowering of global temperatures. Liberal Al Gore gets an Oscar.
Two deadly wars and the campaign of “Change” results in zealots – and continuing and even escalating war. Liberal Barack Obama gets a Nobel Peace Prize.
But I don’t think you can say there’s a trend developing or anything in common here – except maybe the words zealots and liberal.
RBG
Can I suggest 1 little thing?
CAN we FIX this world, and OURSELVES before things JUST DONT WORK??
In the USA and a few other places.
WE have MODIFIED our foods, to the point we have to use chemicals to FORCE them to grow.
WE have modified the MEAT animals to the point they DIE in <5 years.
WE process our food to the point that we have OTHER THINGS TO EXTEND its volume and make you THINK you are getting the SAME amount..