<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloud Fails Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TKilbreath</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1613501</link>
		<dc:creator>TKilbreath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 06:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/#comment-1613501</guid>
		<description>John,

Could you at least prep for your Tech 5 update?  Listening to you try to dry read something you have not looked over prior to doing the update is a waste of my time and yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Could you at least prep for your Tech 5 update?  Listening to you try to dry read something you have not looked over prior to doing the update is a waste of my time and yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1613039</link>
		<dc:creator>pcsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/#comment-1613039</guid>
		<description>After 30 minutes trying to post to twitter, which is down, the cloud must be spreading. 

Too late in the morning to be snark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 30 minutes trying to post to twitter, which is down, the cloud must be spreading. </p>
<p>Too late in the morning to be snark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1613029</link>
		<dc:creator>pcsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/#comment-1613029</guid>
		<description>Help  Looking for shareware.

It all fails sooner or later.

I am rebuilding a Win Me computer for my parents. I need a site that gives me Win Me software.

Looks like I needs a oldversion site with os search.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help  Looking for shareware.</p>
<p>It all fails sooner or later.</p>
<p>I am rebuilding a Win Me computer for my parents. I need a site that gives me Win Me software.</p>
<p>Looks like I needs a oldversion site with os search.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1612979</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/#comment-1612979</guid>
		<description>I heard a rumor that eHarmony isn&#039;t actually a dating service but is actually just collecting personality profiles for Homeland Security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard a rumor that eHarmony isn&#8217;t actually a dating service but is actually just collecting personality profiles for Homeland Security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rufus</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1612976</link>
		<dc:creator>Rufus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/#comment-1612976</guid>
		<description>Maybe MythBusters should do a show about the reliability of the cloud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe MythBusters should do a show about the reliability of the cloud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MillenniumKnight</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1612959</link>
		<dc:creator>MillenniumKnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/#comment-1612959</guid>
		<description>John, could the Intel 17 core processor actually be an i7 Core processor? the i7 and i5 lines are the new chip brand names, similar to &quot;Pentium&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, could the Intel 17 core processor actually be an i7 Core processor? the i7 and i5 lines are the new chip brand names, similar to &#8220;Pentium&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somebody_Else</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1612867</link>
		<dc:creator>Somebody_Else</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/12/17/cloud-fails-again/#comment-1612867</guid>
		<description>The planet they found is close enough that they should be able to analyze its atmosphere using powerful telescopes.

Its probably no good for life though. Its a water planet, but its a little too close to its star and its almost certainly tidally locked (one side is always lit, one side is dark) with extremely high atmospheric pressure keeping the water from boiling off on the star side.

The important thing is that it was discovered very quickly using a new, cheap detection technique. That&#039;s a good sign; it suggests there are lots of watery planets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The planet they found is close enough that they should be able to analyze its atmosphere using powerful telescopes.</p>
<p>Its probably no good for life though. Its a water planet, but its a little too close to its star and its almost certainly tidally locked (one side is always lit, one side is dark) with extremely high atmospheric pressure keeping the water from boiling off on the star side.</p>
<p>The important thing is that it was discovered very quickly using a new, cheap detection technique. That&#8217;s a good sign; it suggests there are lots of watery planets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

