AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) – The now-ubiquitous devices carry such warnings in some countries, though no U.S. states require them, according to the National Conference of State Legislators. A similar effort is afoot in San Francisco, where Mayor Gavin Newsom wants his city to be the nation’s first to require the warnings. Maine Rep. Andrea Boland, D-Sanford, said numerous studies point to the cancer risk, and she has persuaded legislative leaders to allow her proposal to come up for discussion during the 2010 session that begins in January, a session usually reserved for emergency and governors’ bills.
Boland herself uses a cell phone, but with a speaker to keep the phone away from her head. She also leaves the phone off unless she’s expecting a call. At issue is radiation emitted by all cell phones. Under Boland’s bill, manufacturers would have to put labels on phones and packaging warning of the potential for brain cancer associated with electromagnetic radiation. The warnings would recommend that users, especially children and pregnant women, keep the devices away from their head and body.
The Federal Communications Commission, which maintains that all cell phones sold in the U.S. are safe, has set a standard for the “specific absorption rate” of radiofrequency energy, but it doesn’t require handset makers to divulge radiation levels. The San Francisco proposal would require the display of the absorption rate level next to each phone in print at least as big as the price. Boland’s bill is not specific about absorption rate levels, but would require a permanent, nonremovable advisory of risk in black type, except for the word “warning,” which would be large and in red letters. It would also include a color graphic of a child’s brain next to the warning.
While there’s little agreement about the health hazards, Boland said Maine’s roughly 950,000 cell phone users among its 1.3 million residents “do not know what the risks are.” All told, more than 270 million people subscribed to cellular telephone service last year in the United States, an increase from 110 million in 2000, according to CTIA-The Wireless Association. The industry group contends the devices are safe.
In other news….who knew rats could use a cell phone…huh.
Its stories like this that have encouraged me to strap my cell phone around my schwantz. Hopefully, it will make me sterile and look large and spectectular at the same time. Both attractive to the ladies.
Now, as to eventual cancer . . . . . . wait . . . . . wait . . . . . I’ve got a call coming in and I just don’t want to answer it, just yet.
“potential for brain cancer associated with electromagnetic radiation.”
Oh, do you mean like radio and TV broadcasts?
How about WiFi? Garage door openers?
Power lines!!! Crap, everyone knows that powerlines give you leukemia!
right?
How about the freaking monitor on the computer you are staring at right now?
I don’t buy it…. we would all be dead long ago from the electricity leaking out of the power sockets in our houses.
That before/after photo goes a long way toward explaining the inanity of most cell phone conversations I overhear.
#1. bobbo- Oh I get it. Bobbo is a man of science as long as it’s the science of “convenience”.
He he.
[deleted- spam]
#4–McCullough==Yes, I am a man of science. Aren’t we all??? Well, ok, not all of us.
But I don’t get your reference to the “convenience” factor. Convenient or not, science is my guide. Understood and misapplied or not, science is my guide.
Being a man of science is all about testing theories, dealing with the results of testing, always being open to competing theories, finding proof only in a result being replicated.
Now, I don’t know exactly what has upset you but as I AM A MAN OF LETTERS as well, perhaps some exposition on your part would clear this up?
All I know is that when strapping a cell phone to my schwantz and going to the local pickup bar, WITHOUT FAIL, an attractive young lass as always commented: “Is that a cell phone strapped to your schwantzenpecker, or are you just happy to see me?” And repeated testing, results oriented, results have taught me that “How you doin?” is the only proper response. She can dial Tokyo later.
Science is your guide, but you apply it base on convenience. You want sweeping changes to our way of life because of your belief in AGW, but if your phone must become bigger to have room for the non-removable cancer warnings, then you don’t want government meddling. Which is it? Do you want to live in a nanny state or not?
I am ignoring the pedantic details of where you keep your cell phone.
#6 bobbo, still no connection said, on December 21st, 2009 at 12:06 pm
#4–McCullough==Yes, I am a man of science. Aren’t we all??? Well, ok, not all of us.
But I don’t get your reference to the “convenience” factor. Convenient or not, science is my guide. Understood and misapplied or not, science is my guide.
We see the images, but nobody says how the test was conducted.
100X cellphone power with the antenna almost glued to the rat’s cranium while transmission was carried out 24/7 for six months? Gee. We see something.
Was it that? No can say. Because they no say. Ever.
BTW, it’s a bad idea to have a continuously transmitting garage door opener remote strapped to your chumbly bits, emitting 24/7. It will cost you in replacement garage door motors…
#8. “100X cellphone power with the antenna almost glued to the rat’s cranium while transmission was carried out 24/7 for six months? Gee. We see something.”
Yes like many of the teens and pre-teens I see walking the streets today.
BTW, I am not convinced of the “science” either way. It’s too early to know. But, just in case, I use one rarely, mainly because I am not required by my job to wear a leash.
#7–now Benji==how do you post such drivel? Not a thing there makes any sense, not a thing you reference to me did I say either now or any recent post. Must be that weird fundamentalist code words of equivalence reference you are using===but sane people don’t carry that book around with them for constant nutjobbing.
Pendantic would have been much funnier.
When there is something a little more conclusive I’ll pay attention.
This just in!
Docs determine that the root cause of all cancers is “life”.
Did they make rat-size cell phones or did the little fellahs have to walk around talking on full size phones? Their arms must’ve been tired!
It’s difficult to take any of these studies seriously after the global warming study turned out to be one big lie for financial and political purposes.
More likely they stuck a rat in a microwave oven just long enough to get the desired result thus securing their funding for years to come.
Ionizing radiation, Non-ionizing radiation. How many of you geniuses know the difference? I am not worried because I know the difference.
Hey! Why are you showing pieces of conFusion brain here!
I’d like to know how much radiation my phone is putting out. I regularly use my phone for hours each day.
Better to be careful and restrict cell phones usage to emergency situations only. It’s pretty obvious that having such waves near your ear is not good. The only reason nothing is done is the billions in profits being made by Big Telephony.
Cellphones have been around for a long time. If there was a problem it should have shown up by now. Twenty years would be a long time for inconclusivity to last.
Rating cellphones by their radiation level serves two purposes “safety” and coverage. Those with a “safe” level of radiation can also be designated crappy cellphones.
Those with an “unsafe” level work better in fringe areas because the transmitter is stronger. The result may be that people then move to the stronger brain boilers for better coverage.
As for marketing “banned in Maine” will do for cellphones what “lasting longer than four hours” did for pharmaceuticals.
Glad to see stupidity is alive and well in Maine.