As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama promised “transparency” in government. The impression was left that we’d all be able to pull up a chair and watch administration officials and lawmakers hash out their philosophical and policy differences as they make laws that affect our lives.

Specifically, Obama said, “we’ll have [healthcare reform] negotiations televised on C-SPAN, so the people can see who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents and who is making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the insurance companies.”

But now, the White House seems to be pulling back from that pledge, and that’s rankled some Democrats as well as Republicans, not to mention news analysts and opinion makers always eager for a squabble – especially if it hints at a broken promise.
[...]
In a recent letter to congressional leaders, C-SPAN chief executive Brian Lamb asked lawmakers to televise their healthcare discussions.

“The American people pay for all this that goes on in this town,” Mr. Lamb said on the Bill Press Show. “It’s always been my contention – and it’s not a sophisticated, intelligent position, it’s just a gut reaction – that if we pay for something, and it’s the public’s business, we ought to be able to see how it’s done. It’s just that simple.”




  1. The0ne says:

    Seems everyone is resorting to name calling now so I’ll join in as well :)

    fck you all, although this has nothing to do with the thread.

    Was that transparent enough or do I need to lift this middle finger of mine to be more specific?

  2. Guyver says:

    57, Here’s a shocker. We can stop increasing the power / size of government.

    When you do that, you can reduce the influence of corrupt politicians.

    So even though you acknowledge corruption will ALWAYS be with us, their effect on us would be rather limited.



Bad Behavior has blocked 24856 access attempts in the last 7 days.