<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goldman CEO Takes a Measly 9 Million Dollar Bonus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:51:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Germain</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1654189</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Germain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1654189</guid>
		<description>1)The head of the IMF is Mr. Strauss Kahn
2)The CEO of Goldman Sachs is Mr. Blankfein
3)The head of the SEC Investigation commitee investigation Goldman Sach in Greeces and int. crisis is Mr. Levin
4)The head of the FED in US is Mr. Bernanke
5)Speculators on a downgoing Euro are
a)Mr. George Soros Soros Fund management
b)Mr. David Einhorn Greenlight Capital
c)Mr. Jong Paulson 
4)Mr. Steven Cohen SAC Capital

I dont know for sure but is it a coincedence that all these gentlemen ar jewish?
Is this a worldwide conspirency taking Europe and the US downwords and leve them in a financial crisis, so legislation can be changed
and the western world becomes more a digital controled police state? Who is in control you think?

Well good luck finding it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)The head of the IMF is Mr. Strauss Kahn<br />
2)The CEO of Goldman Sachs is Mr. Blankfein<br />
3)The head of the SEC Investigation commitee investigation Goldman Sach in Greeces and int. crisis is Mr. Levin<br />
4)The head of the FED in US is Mr. Bernanke<br />
5)Speculators on a downgoing Euro are<br />
a)Mr. George Soros Soros Fund management<br />
b)Mr. David Einhorn Greenlight Capital<br />
c)Mr. Jong Paulson<br />
4)Mr. Steven Cohen SAC Capital</p>
<p>I dont know for sure but is it a coincedence that all these gentlemen ar jewish?<br />
Is this a worldwide conspirency taking Europe and the US downwords and leve them in a financial crisis, so legislation can be changed<br />
and the western world becomes more a digital controled police state? Who is in control you think?</p>
<p>Well good luck finding it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BmoreBadBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1630188</link>
		<dc:creator>BmoreBadBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1630188</guid>
		<description>@ #29 Well, this is an internet blog forum, so if you want people to know you&#039;re being sarcastic, you&#039;re going to have to spell it out.

Of course big organizations breed corruption, because humans run them and humans by nature have their own interests as priority #1. The difference between corruption in business and corruption in government is business gets your participation on a voluntary basis, but government gets your participation by force. Extortion is irresponsible, and is the basis for all that is government. A $9 million dollar bonus to a man who doesn&#039;t deserve it is irresponsible, but it is the owner of that company&#039;s right to pay him that. If it&#039;s the wrong decision, market forces will cause that company to fail, and in a truly free market economy, it would fail, without government bail outs coming from taxing citizen slaves.

Rules are necessary, but they should come organically, from individuals interacting with each other on a consensual basis, not from some guy dressed in a robe sitting on high. Human nature is predictable, we&#039;re all selfish to one degree or another. That&#039;s all you can count on. If you expect a representative that you &quot;elect&quot; to put your interests ahead of his own you must be on something really, really strong. The kind of &quot;fairy tale&quot; capitalism I speak of banks on the fact that all humans are selfish, and takes advantage of that fact so we all become more productive while living as freely as humanly possible. I dare say you are the one living in a fairy tale if you think giving people power, then turning around and expecting them to use it for your benefit ahead of theirs, is a realistic goal. Government is not necessary. It is a bane on the human spirit. For the government is just another version of a slave master, one that we have been cajoled into believing is necessary and good but in fact is a blood sucking tyrant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #29 Well, this is an internet blog forum, so if you want people to know you&#8217;re being sarcastic, you&#8217;re going to have to spell it out.</p>
<p>Of course big organizations breed corruption, because humans run them and humans by nature have their own interests as priority #1. The difference between corruption in business and corruption in government is business gets your participation on a voluntary basis, but government gets your participation by force. Extortion is irresponsible, and is the basis for all that is government. A $9 million dollar bonus to a man who doesn&#8217;t deserve it is irresponsible, but it is the owner of that company&#8217;s right to pay him that. If it&#8217;s the wrong decision, market forces will cause that company to fail, and in a truly free market economy, it would fail, without government bail outs coming from taxing citizen slaves.</p>
<p>Rules are necessary, but they should come organically, from individuals interacting with each other on a consensual basis, not from some guy dressed in a robe sitting on high. Human nature is predictable, we&#8217;re all selfish to one degree or another. That&#8217;s all you can count on. If you expect a representative that you &#8220;elect&#8221; to put your interests ahead of his own you must be on something really, really strong. The kind of &#8220;fairy tale&#8221; capitalism I speak of banks on the fact that all humans are selfish, and takes advantage of that fact so we all become more productive while living as freely as humanly possible. I dare say you are the one living in a fairy tale if you think giving people power, then turning around and expecting them to use it for your benefit ahead of theirs, is a realistic goal. Government is not necessary. It is a bane on the human spirit. For the government is just another version of a slave master, one that we have been cajoled into believing is necessary and good but in fact is a blood sucking tyrant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Cain</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1630061</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Cain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1630061</guid>
		<description>The wealthy start all the wars, why not force them to pay for them?  90% tax rate in income.
If not for foreign based economic interests, would we really be embroiled in faraway wars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wealthy start all the wars, why not force them to pay for them?  90% tax rate in income.<br />
If not for foreign based economic interests, would we really be embroiled in faraway wars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Cain</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1630060</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Cain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1630060</guid>
		<description>The salary of one of the Joint Chiefs (4 star general, admiral, etc) is $180,000 a year.
Their job is to run the military and ensure the defense of the entire nation.

So exactly why does a Goldman CEO get a $9,000,000 bonus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The salary of one of the Joint Chiefs (4 star general, admiral, etc) is $180,000 a year.<br />
Their job is to run the military and ensure the defense of the entire nation.</p>
<p>So exactly why does a Goldman CEO get a $9,000,000 bonus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1629950</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1629950</guid>
		<description>Re#28, When I said, “Where we disagree is that free enterprise has to be regulated in ways that prevent an entity from having more power and corruption than the government.&quot;, I was saying so with my tongue firmly planted in my cheek.

Large organizations of any kind breed corruption... from religions to government. Everything has gotten out of hand. A 9 million dollar bonus to one man in an irresponsible, economically threatening company, illustrates that perfectly. The fairy tale kind of capitalism you envision can&#039;t possibly exist on this earth unless you can change the nature of mankind first. Rules are necessary.  Government is necessary. Human nature is predictable. There is a balance between all those things that has allowed us to prosper. What we have to do now is get things back in balance, toned down and cleaned up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re#28, When I said, “Where we disagree is that free enterprise has to be regulated in ways that prevent an entity from having more power and corruption than the government.&#8221;, I was saying so with my tongue firmly planted in my cheek.</p>
<p>Large organizations of any kind breed corruption&#8230; from religions to government. Everything has gotten out of hand. A 9 million dollar bonus to one man in an irresponsible, economically threatening company, illustrates that perfectly. The fairy tale kind of capitalism you envision can&#8217;t possibly exist on this earth unless you can change the nature of mankind first. Rules are necessary.  Government is necessary. Human nature is predictable. There is a balance between all those things that has allowed us to prosper. What we have to do now is get things back in balance, toned down and cleaned up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BmoreBadBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1629926</link>
		<dc:creator>BmoreBadBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1629926</guid>
		<description>#24 Ever watch &quot;Who killed the electric car?&quot; Who knows what we&#039;d be driving without the intervention of government on behalf of big oil? When on earth have we ever had unfettered capitalism? Before our lovely government taxed us, the British taxed us. Remember the Boston Tea Party? Our so called revolution was merely substituting one set of slave masters from far away with another much more local. Government has always been around in one form or another to screw things up for the majority of the populace who would like to be left alone and interact with each other on a consensual basis. Power corrupts, yes. But power from unadulterated capitalism comes from serving your customers. If you don&#039;t do that in the first place, you&#039;ll never grow as a business. Power from government is gained and maintained from extortion and the capitulation from the masses. Corporatism is the evil two-headed monster that has grown from big business getting into bed with big government. And every now and then one head bites the other one, but most of the time, it just stomps on the rest of us. Try being a true skeptic and question government as a whole, instead of getting caught up in the red team vs. blue team paradigm. Oh, and how has regulations fixed capitalism thus far? How many of them are on the books? How is that working out? And your statement: &quot;Where we disagree is that free enterprise has to be regulated in ways that prevent an entity from having more power and corruption than the government.&quot; is very telling. So I guess you&#039;ve come to terms with corruption from the government and will be happy as long as corporations are less corrupt than government? (Now where&#039;s my pet peeve of the day jingle?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#24 Ever watch &#8220;Who killed the electric car?&#8221; Who knows what we&#8217;d be driving without the intervention of government on behalf of big oil? When on earth have we ever had unfettered capitalism? Before our lovely government taxed us, the British taxed us. Remember the Boston Tea Party? Our so called revolution was merely substituting one set of slave masters from far away with another much more local. Government has always been around in one form or another to screw things up for the majority of the populace who would like to be left alone and interact with each other on a consensual basis. Power corrupts, yes. But power from unadulterated capitalism comes from serving your customers. If you don&#8217;t do that in the first place, you&#8217;ll never grow as a business. Power from government is gained and maintained from extortion and the capitulation from the masses. Corporatism is the evil two-headed monster that has grown from big business getting into bed with big government. And every now and then one head bites the other one, but most of the time, it just stomps on the rest of us. Try being a true skeptic and question government as a whole, instead of getting caught up in the red team vs. blue team paradigm. Oh, and how has regulations fixed capitalism thus far? How many of them are on the books? How is that working out? And your statement: &#8220;Where we disagree is that free enterprise has to be regulated in ways that prevent an entity from having more power and corruption than the government.&#8221; is very telling. So I guess you&#8217;ve come to terms with corruption from the government and will be happy as long as corporations are less corrupt than government? (Now where&#8217;s my pet peeve of the day jingle?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Animby</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1629905</link>
		<dc:creator>Animby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1629905</guid>
		<description>Hey Cap&#039;n: It may only be a dollar but, by the end of the year, many of them were worth it, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Cap&#8217;n: It may only be a dollar but, by the end of the year, many of them were worth it, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'nKangaroo</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1629869</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'nKangaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1629869</guid>
		<description>#25  &quot;In 2008 many CEOs had huge negative incomes.&quot;

I think you meant to say their net worth was negatively impacted.  To have a negative income the CEO would have had to pay money to his employer to retain his job.  The closest to that situation I know of is several CEOs working for a salary of a $1 for the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#25  &#8220;In 2008 many CEOs had huge negative incomes.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you meant to say their net worth was negatively impacted.  To have a negative income the CEO would have had to pay money to his employer to retain his job.  The closest to that situation I know of is several CEOs working for a salary of a $1 for the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeN</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1629859</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1629859</guid>
		<description>With their stock holding I wonder what his real income was?  In 2008 many CEOs had huge negative incomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With their stock holding I wonder what his real income was?  In 2008 many CEOs had huge negative incomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1629835</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1629835</guid>
		<description>#20, you&#039;ve described the flaws of unfettered capitalism. The US has a system of capitalism without morals or limits. 

&lt;i&gt;&quot;the natural process of capitalism is the process in which one person wants something and another person has it, they perform a trade, without interference from an unwanted 3rd party, in this case, government. &quot; &lt;/i&gt;

Not true. The &quot;natural&quot; process of capitalism moves toward power and corruption... without fail. The government was not an unwanted 3rd party. They were a necessary and wanted 3rd party in an unfortunate situation where capitalism went awry. That now has to be fixed by regulations, so that it never happens again. Where we disagree is that free enterprise has to be regulated in ways that prevent an entity from having more power and corruption than the government. You are being way too unrealistic in suggesting that we simply stop buying a product when that happens. Have you stopped buying gas yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#20, you&#8217;ve described the flaws of unfettered capitalism. The US has a system of capitalism without morals or limits. </p>
<p><i>&#8220;the natural process of capitalism is the process in which one person wants something and another person has it, they perform a trade, without interference from an unwanted 3rd party, in this case, government. &#8221; </i></p>
<p>Not true. The &#8220;natural&#8221; process of capitalism moves toward power and corruption&#8230; without fail. The government was not an unwanted 3rd party. They were a necessary and wanted 3rd party in an unfortunate situation where capitalism went awry. That now has to be fixed by regulations, so that it never happens again. Where we disagree is that free enterprise has to be regulated in ways that prevent an entity from having more power and corruption than the government. You are being way too unrealistic in suggesting that we simply stop buying a product when that happens. Have you stopped buying gas yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimD</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1629827</link>
		<dc:creator>JimD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1629827</guid>
		<description>Time to SOAK THE RICH !!!  Elvis paid 91% during the &quot;Golden Fifties&quot;,  so should these SCUM !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to SOAK THE RICH !!!  Elvis paid 91% during the &#8220;Golden Fifties&#8221;,  so should these SCUM !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1629825</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1629825</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Winston said,  on February 6th, 2010 at 8:35 pm
&gt;&gt; When the second crash occurs later this year, I hope it will inspire a “vote them ALL out” campaign.

This will just make things worse.

The dumbest voters in the worst states with the most corrupt senators will just keep their guys in office in response to some emotional appeal -- &quot;save the unborn&quot; or  &quot;the Mexicans are invading&quot; or &quot;the gays are threatening your marriage&quot; or &quot;the terrorists will kill you&quot;

So who gets voted out?  The better of the bunch leaving the worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Winston said,  on February 6th, 2010 at 8:35 pm<br />
&gt;&gt; When the second crash occurs later this year, I hope it will inspire a “vote them ALL out” campaign.</p>
<p>This will just make things worse.</p>
<p>The dumbest voters in the worst states with the most corrupt senators will just keep their guys in office in response to some emotional appeal &#8212; &#8220;save the unborn&#8221; or  &#8220;the Mexicans are invading&#8221; or &#8220;the gays are threatening your marriage&#8221; or &#8220;the terrorists will kill you&#8221;</p>
<p>So who gets voted out?  The better of the bunch leaving the worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-2/#comment-1629821</link>
		<dc:creator>Winston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1629821</guid>
		<description>When the second crash occurs later this year, I hope it will inspire a &quot;vote them ALL out&quot; campaign.  Anyone who voted for the bailouts and, later, the toothless financial &quot;reform&quot; legislation should be voted out of office _unless_ they actively investigate and prosecute the perps of the _massive_ fraud that took place in the US financial system over the last ten years.

Oh, wait... I&#039;m dreaming.  That would require an _informed_ populace.  So, when the second crash occurs, we&#039;ll just get screwed again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the second crash occurs later this year, I hope it will inspire a &#8220;vote them ALL out&#8221; campaign.  Anyone who voted for the bailouts and, later, the toothless financial &#8220;reform&#8221; legislation should be voted out of office _unless_ they actively investigate and prosecute the perps of the _massive_ fraud that took place in the US financial system over the last ten years.</p>
<p>Oh, wait&#8230; I&#8217;m dreaming.  That would require an _informed_ populace.  So, when the second crash occurs, we&#8217;ll just get screwed again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BmoreBadBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-1629814</link>
		<dc:creator>BmoreBadBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1629814</guid>
		<description>#17 gladly. A corporation is an entity that the government created to protect the owners of companies from liability. That&#039;s why corporations are treated as individuals in the eyes of the law. If a company goes down in flames or is sued, the owners aren&#039;t held responsible for its debts, frauds, etc. Which is why a company like AIG can take the risks it did. If the owners of AIG had to pay back all those retirement funds for faulty accounting and trade practices, without reliance on government protection from law suits and bailout money, do you think they would&#039;ve practiced naked default swaps in the first place?

What I mean by the natural process of capitalism is the process in which one person wants something and another person has it, they perform a trade, without interference from an unwanted 3rd party, in this case, government. Corporations are privately owned, but are regulated by the government. On first glance, you might think that&#039;s a great idea. This protects the consumer. In an ideal world, this would be true. Unfortunately, those regulations are created by human beings that can be bought by the very same corporations they are regulating! So, for example, if you&#039;re a senator running for re-election and you&#039;re running out of tv ad money, and Corporation X throws millions of dollars your way, don&#039;t you think you&#039;d be willing to vote aye for a piece of legislation buried in a bill 1000 pages long to scratch their back?

The free market protects the consumer better than legislation. If you don&#039;t like what a company is doing, stop patronizing it. The company loses business and if it doesn&#039;t correct the problem soon it will go out of business. If you don&#039;t like (or don&#039;t even know) all the regulations being voted for by your senator, you can wait 6 years to try to vote him out, but as long as he gets more advertising money from that corporation, most people will forget his voting record by then and will be persuaded by his pretty little TV ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#17 gladly. A corporation is an entity that the government created to protect the owners of companies from liability. That&#8217;s why corporations are treated as individuals in the eyes of the law. If a company goes down in flames or is sued, the owners aren&#8217;t held responsible for its debts, frauds, etc. Which is why a company like AIG can take the risks it did. If the owners of AIG had to pay back all those retirement funds for faulty accounting and trade practices, without reliance on government protection from law suits and bailout money, do you think they would&#8217;ve practiced naked default swaps in the first place?</p>
<p>What I mean by the natural process of capitalism is the process in which one person wants something and another person has it, they perform a trade, without interference from an unwanted 3rd party, in this case, government. Corporations are privately owned, but are regulated by the government. On first glance, you might think that&#8217;s a great idea. This protects the consumer. In an ideal world, this would be true. Unfortunately, those regulations are created by human beings that can be bought by the very same corporations they are regulating! So, for example, if you&#8217;re a senator running for re-election and you&#8217;re running out of tv ad money, and Corporation X throws millions of dollars your way, don&#8217;t you think you&#8217;d be willing to vote aye for a piece of legislation buried in a bill 1000 pages long to scratch their back?</p>
<p>The free market protects the consumer better than legislation. If you don&#8217;t like what a company is doing, stop patronizing it. The company loses business and if it doesn&#8217;t correct the problem soon it will go out of business. If you don&#8217;t like (or don&#8217;t even know) all the regulations being voted for by your senator, you can wait 6 years to try to vote him out, but as long as he gets more advertising money from that corporation, most people will forget his voting record by then and will be persuaded by his pretty little TV ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Animby</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/02/06/goldman-ceo-takes-a-measly-9-million-dollar-bonus/comment-page-1/#comment-1629811</link>
		<dc:creator>Animby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=68680#comment-1629811</guid>
		<description>You idjits can argue politics all you want. But I keep thinking of the human misery. I just hope his kids don&#039;t go hungry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You idjits can argue politics all you want. But I keep thinking of the human misery. I just hope his kids don&#8217;t go hungry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

