By SN
Friday February 12, 2010
Wired via the
Consumerist:
Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles. Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:
* Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn’t make much money off of the games.
* A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
* If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that “do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?” Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.
Point 1: You created the pricing model, sucks to be you
Point 2: Add some lead time
Point 3: Bullshit, that’s a marketing win.
This just sounds like bull.
Everyone knows the problems that the Xbox 360 has had.
These machines would certainly get a lot of use with the military and Microsoft does not want the cost and bad publicity of having these machines fail over and over again.
I don’t get the comments… this was in 2006, when it launched. Of course the 360 would be a great platform for the army to use, but I agree with Microsoft. If they can’t make money off it, then it’s not worth the troubles. They were launching and the shortage was an issue at the time… the game machine is to sell games… not platform for a single game. Not money to be made. I also agree, that the army is not a good marketing partner. Sounds like they made the right decision.
Considering the quality problems MS has had with the XBox 360′s, the military should be glad that it dodged that bullet.
Having the military as a customer is a pain in the ass. There are tons of rules, and some rather mean terms. For example, no matter how much they buy from you, they get the price you give to your best customers. I don’t blame them for telling the DoD to take their business and shove it.
1. The pricing of things is their own fault so stop overcharging for the games to subsidise the console!
2. Make more. That’s what capitalism is for.
3. Fair point. It would seriously harm international sales.
The problem is, they don’t want to make more, Microsoft loses money on every console they make. They count on people buying lots of overpriced games to make up the loss and give them an overall profit. Only the Wii doesn’t have that problem, Nintendo makes a profit on each Wii sold so they could easily make a deal with the military, sell them a million Wiis and be doing just fine.
Let’s be honest, there hasn’t been a shortage of 360s since launch. I’m sure M$ could easily make as many as the military needed, it’s all a bunch of PR hooey.
So… Now that we have hit that part of the console cycle where even cheap entry level computers have better games than the consoles sales are tapering off. So as the sales peter down to nothing over the next three years or so the ABM crowd can claim victory for having destroyed microsoft and limiting them to only selling 2x as many consoles this generation as they did last….
Yay fosstardia won!…. Um I guess…
Sounds like someone else at Microsoft needs to be fired for making a bonehead call.
Whoa! The Bullshit Detector just pegged out so hard the needle bent!
You don’t become the richest man in the universe by doing the right thing.
#6
The army will be interested in buying Wii’s once they perfect the gun that kills enemies when shaken properly. Until they make games which can be played cooperatively and can be used to teach military theory the wii is useless to them.
#7
A majority of computer games are made for MICROSOFT windows. For them its a win either way.
If microsoft really thinks that partnering with the army would taint their reputation and give them the flavour of a weapon, perhaps they should stop releasing FPS. Until then, I would think that having the military using your product they way you intend for it to be used would be a selling point.
Big whoop. The Air Force is buying up PS3s just to get the Cell processor for cheap.
Who’s the guy in the chefs jacket?
If this happened at the XBox launch, I’m sure the military has been able to get all the XBoxes they want since then.
Something about this story smells wrong…
Couldn’t they go to BestBuy (ick)?
#13 That would be the soup Nazi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Soup_Nazi
#13
Its the ‘Soup Nazi’ – http://tinyurl.com/2j96m2
Damn, when I was in the Navy, the whole aircraft carrier (5000+ guys) had but one videogame, the original Dig-Dug arcade machine (30 years ago!). The DP techs, had a working PacMan for the Wang mini computer, but that was only available to us DP’s. For the most part we had to pay for our own entertainments, I guess now that they have women everywhere in the armed forces, they need to really keep everyone distracted. Considering their answers to the request for Xbox, their reaction sounds down right unpatriotic. Afterall M$ owes most of their success to the government that gives judicial support to their monopoly.
@MrMiGu
Finland’s army uses the Wii for fightness training.
Wow that chick is hot!