Have these chuckleheads learned nothing from the past? Only the winners get to rewrite the history books. Plus, there are just too many people still around who actually lived through the past twenty years who know what really happened. Or are books and whatnot from these people meant to be fiction?

Now the revisionist floodgates have opened with the simultaneous arrival of Karl Rove’s memoir and Keep America Safe, a new right-wing noise machine invented by Dick Cheney’s daughter Liz and the inevitable William Kristol. This gang’s rewriting of history knows few bounds. To hear them tell it, 9/11 was so completely Bill Clinton’s fault that it retroactively happened while he was still in office. The Bush White House is equally blameless for the post-9/11 resurgence of the Taliban, Al Qaeda and Iran. Instead it’s President Obama who is endangering America by coddling terrorists and stopping torture.

Could any of this non-reality-based shtick stick? So far the answer is No. Rove’s book and Keep America Safe could be the best political news for the White House in some time. This new eruption of misinformation and rancor vividly reminds Americans why they couldn’t wait for Bush and Cheney to leave Washington.

But the old regime’s attack squads are relentless and shameless. The Obama administration, which put the brakes on any new investigations into Bush-Cheney national security malfeasance upon taking office, will sooner or later have to strike back. Once the Bush-Cheney failures in Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran again come home to roost, as they undoubtedly and explosively will, someone will have to remind our amnesia-prone nation who really enabled America’s enemies in the run-up to 9/11 and in its aftermath.




  1. MikeN says:

    >destabilizing influence in the Middle East.

    Democracy is a destabilizing influence in the Middle East.

    >This ad comes out, not during the Bush DOJ, when I guess it was ok to defend terrorists,

    Did the Bush DoJ hire these guys, or Obama? The Justice Department wouldn’t identify the people who did this work and what positions they were in for people to judge for themselves.

    >something wrong or shameful about defending people who you are asked to defend.

    Well, in these cases, the question was whether the people in question should be defended at all, should they have been in the regular courts. Quite different than defending a murderer, rapist, etc, where the government must prove its case.

  2. Frank IBC says:

    #40 ECA -

    Could you be more specific than that?

  3. The0ne says:

    I see giant balls everywhere! I may know math and logic but those be damn in the name of arrogance and elitism!

  4. Greg Allen says:

    Rove, Cheney, Kristol… what a vomitous trio.

    If we lived in a just world, Americans would be parading their heads around on pikes.



Bad Behavior has blocked 24832 access attempts in the last 7 days.