Something to think about while you are using your PC, or while standing in line for hours trying to buy your latest generation smartphone.




  1. pedro says:

    #19 Good to see you do not miss an opportunity to make a fool of yourself. I crown thee the King Sheeple!

  2. bobbo, to the left of Obama says:

    “Bunch of manipulating bastards preying on the ignorant.”

    Translate that to Latin and you got a motto.

    Here ya go: “e plural unum” (with a heavy dose of wage slavery)

    So, the heart really does need to identify the “real issue” at work. In Congo, tribal warfare may be over gold, in South Africa over diamonds, but what of Sudan and Somalia? There it is religion and race but still breaking down along tribal lines. Is pure textual analysis sufficient to identify “TRIBAL” as the pragmatic issue at work or do we need to go deeper?

    “Conflict Minerals” or “Tribal Work Product?” Child labor, prison labor, wage slaves–spot the effective differences that warrant distinction. Should the “free market” be left to work its magic or should it be manipulated so objectively to what end? Should something that can’t work be pursued anyway for the morality involved.

    Lets make a venn diagram. Draw a big circle. Label it Everything. Done.

  3. Skeptic says:

    Boycott all electronics! I will no longer use my pacemaker.

    I wonder if that lady drives a car? Damn computers are everywhere.

  4. #1 – bobbo,

    I hate being a naysayer, and I did buy dolphin safe tuna, and diamonds are but capitulation to the objectifying of men as wallets with dicks, but I don’t think buying conflict free minerals has a ghost of a chance to have any impact at all except to raise the price of consumer electronics while all these fungible unmarkable assets are sold in markets that don’t care.

    Wouldn’t raising the price have the additional benefit of reducing unsustainable Consumerism?

  5. Coutreau says:

    @2
    Why do you think Africa and the Middle East are such problems? Because white Europeans went into both areas and forced tribes/groups that didn’t like each other into the same area and called it a country. Pretty much all these problems are rooted at white Europeans deciding a different life style wasn’t good enough and abruptly and forcibly changed it. Similar to how the US thought US democracy would be a perfect fit for Iraq (protip: it isn’t). I’m sure there’d be fighting without the whole country business but at least they’d have been further apart.

  6. Floyd says:

    “Conflict Free”–so far as I know, even if countries and tribes don’t conflict, corporations will.

  7. freddybobs68k says:

    I agree that I think though well intentioned this is not going to produce any results.

    I believe we are engaged in at least two significant conflicts at the moment. They have caused between them significantly more than 100,000 deaths. They have also caused the actual deaths of thousands of Americans. And continue to do so. Stopping these conflicts would seem to have a much larger impact – and presumably easier for us to do, seeing as we are the protagonists. As a bonus we will save not only lives, but trillions of dollars.

    We could even consider using some of those saved trillions of dollars to help the people of congo. And as an additional bonus we may be able to gain some higher moral ground discussing ‘conflict’ with these apparently irredeemably conflict happy African tribes. Because we would never engage in such stupidity.

  8. bobbo, not a student of the dismal science, but I am on a budget says:

    #24–Scott==”Wouldn’t raising the price have the additional benefit of reducing unsustainable Consumerism?” //// Of course it would if the price rose that high enough to affect such purchasing decisions. I should have said “might” increase the price of consumer goods. The whole point of these FUNGIBLE resources is that as long as total demand somewhat matches total supply there should be no price impact at all. Just a feel good experience for those that buy labels and marketing programs. And not paradoxically, I could see the raw materials cost staying the same while the cost of the final product went up to cover the marketing costs, or the additional returns to stockholders/CEO for the cleverness of the false differentiation?

    But your main point is wanting to reduce unsustainable consumerism? Why do you want to do that? There is an absolute tautology there. Consumerism is sustained at whatever level it occupies. Consume something at a lower rate and it seems to me that ultimately it still gets consumed or replaced by something else that is consumed? I don’t understand what goal/concept you are advancing other than a religious point trying to impose some artificial meaning on the universe.

    Energy and matter are the same thing. Neither can be consumed, only changed in form.

    If the universe “means” anything, it means unrestrained consumerism. Certainly its the only reality that means anything? Go forth and multiply==what else is that but a call to consumerism?

  9. Angus says:

    Tantalum = Australia. Tungsten = China. Gold = South Africa. All these materials are available from other sources, but at higher prices. Just like most things like these, it’s not the use of these materials that’s the problem, it’s the cheap bastards like us that demand stuff at a cheap price that cause stuff like this. It’s us, not the computers, that cause the problem.

  10. pedro says:

    #25 So the fighting and the wars began with the intrusion of the white people on those regions, huh? They were all peace & quiet before. Are you for real?

  11. Rectal Dysfunction says:

    Sorry, any solution to anything that involves Americans making do with less of anything is a nonstarter. That violates the fundemental purpose of the universe.

  12. justchecking says:

    (Sorry, any solution to anything that involves Americans making do with less of anything is a nonstarter. That violates the fundemental purpose of the universe.)

    I assume you posted this from your non-air-conditioned yurt using a hand cranked computer made with locally-obtained materials? I further assume you ate only locally grown produce for breakfast.

  13. Dallas says:

    So far Pedrito summed it up for the Republipuke side…. ” They’re gonna kill each other anyway, might as well be for make’n us iPods”.

    very unoriginal

  14. pedro says:

    #33 So Dullas, you support the cuban embargo, right?

  15. Rectal Dysfunction says:

    32- I posted from my air conditioned house using my smartphone. This post is from my SUV (parked, of course). I think you missed my point.

  16. qb says:

    BTW, batteries are much bigger problem.

  17. Dallas says:

    #34 Actually, I don’t – at least not anymore. This is a failed 50 yr policy driven by the dinosaur Republipuke Cubans in Miami of which the Gringo Republipukes have been exploiting for decades.

    Every four years the ‘pukes head to Miami for the “Cuba Si, Castro No”, get the votes and on to the next election.

    Pedrito, any Cubans in your village playing dominos? What do they think? BTW, I love the Cuban people and the food and they can dance!

  18. Gildersleeve says:

    I’m commenting on this with no prior knowledge of the topic. Why? Because I don’t have the patience to sit through a video. I’d rather read plain text, and get to the point in 1/3 the time. My hometown TV station’s website does this too – video only on some key topics. Cripes I’ll watch the news if I want to sit through a video.

    So, what the hell is wrong in the Congo now?

  19. pedro says:

    #37 Good to see you’re proud to show your hypocrisy regarding embargoes as well. Sheeple!

  20. sargasso_c says:

    Not certain about that advertisement’s accuracy.



Bad Behavior has blocked 25406 access attempts in the last 7 days.