TThor says:

Ron Paul 2012!

JMRouse says:

Ron Paul’s a hack. His followers always like to give him credit for predicting the economic meltdown, but fail to mention that he had been predicting it for so long that he is the equivalent of the guy you see on the side of the street holding up a sign that says “The End is Near!” Sure the world is going to end at some point, but do you give that guy credit? That’s the problem with Ron Paul. He had been saying the economy is going to collapse for so long, about everything, that he has lost his credibility.

I will of course be hated on here for point this fact out. Enjoy and have fun.

Fishguy says:

JMR, good point. Too bad you’re wrong. The economy has been going in the toilet since Ron Paul began talking about it. It has just taken this long for everyone else to realize the damage.

The most interesting thing about this clip is the news anchor’s defense of Obama. He simply ignores the fact that Obama did state it is a just war. Another classic case of the liberal media at work busily re-writing history.

bobbo, telling shit from shinola says:

Why is a fish the sweetest smelling offering to post so far?

You other’all are quite incorrect. “This War” referring to Afghanistan Invasion, War, and Current Nation Building does not change impetus and History with each new election of a President.

Ron Paul did a better job than Mike Steele did in twisting away/spinning/BS’s/Lying/Rewriting History, what is ON TAPE ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS FRICKING LISTEN TO IT!!!!, but HE is wrong and Lemon, while whining like a little bitch, did the admirable job in trying to nail him to his position.

What?–you think Ron Paul the LIEberTARD and Mike Steele are the ony two right people on this issue?–oh, and the idiots on this blog too. OK–Ron Paul, Mike Steele first two above plus the Galt du Jour.

Speaking of retards rewriting rehistory: #2–Jeanne==Obama is doing just exactly what he said he was going to do.

What is the TRUTH to you people???? Just a canvas for you to write whatever BS you want to?

Seems so.

Stoopid Hoomans.

bobbo, to the left of Obama says:

#9–A Patriot==you and Ron Paul may want to think that is what he “meant” to say but that is not what he actually SAID. I am, was, and always will be to the LEFT of BushLight, so I am NOT an Obamatard. Interesting you can’t see the world any other way.

No, when Obama campaigned and said he was “for” the War in Afghanistan I thought he was lying to give himself COVER for his anti-Iraq stance. Sadly, he was telling the truth.

Disagree again, or anyone else, and we’ll just have to transcribe from the video exactly what Steele did say. Steele is a loose cannon as full as gaff’s as Joe Biden==but Joe Biden is in charge of staying out of the way while Steele is supposed to be the leader of the Repug Party/Policy Wonk/Fund Raiser. Precise in the use of language.

If Steele meant to say what you would like him to have said, he needed to use different words.

Words have meaning.

BTW–I had to laugh. Katherine Weymouth, CEO of Washington Post asked by Karen Dunlap, President of whocares: “Do you angst over blah, blah” and she replied: “Yes, I do angst over blah, blah.”

Our media. No wonder you people can’t tell shit from shinola.

bobbo, to the left of Obama says:

“…his is a war of Obama’s choosing. This is not something the United States has actively prosecuted or wanted to engage in.” ((Ron Paul is correct that this is (now) Obama’s War but catch the “wanted” in Steele’s Stateent. Idiot Americans/Congress supported our idiotic invasion and staying in Afghanistan.))

McCain finally right about something (re Steele’s comments) said: “Those statements are wildly inaccurate…”

Republicans are for war. War all the time. Bankrupting War for glory, right or wrong. When treading on such thin ice, Steele should have chosen his words very carefully==along the lines that Ron Paul suggested. But Steele got caught up in thinking he was only talking to his base, and to the Republican Base, you can say anything, the more retarded/anti-Obama the better. He’d get away with it too given the intellectual rigor of the American Public displayed on this thread, were it not for the senior Politicians paid for by the Military-Industrial complex.

Stoopid Hoomans.

jccalhoun says:

I didn’t listen to the whole thing. However, I was shocked to hear a republican be antiwar even if i was a fringe republican like Paul. I think that both Paul and the host were spinning things their own way.

bobbo, we think with words, and flower with ideas. says:

#15–DA==really?

In this thread, I challenged the Republicans and Obama. Please state the words you think constitute an apology?

Do you understand what that words means or do you just use any negative sounding words against whomever you see as an opponent without thought as to what you are actually saying? Kinda like Michael Steele?

Go ahead. I’ll wait.

Zybch says:

And all the lithium they’re thinking of using to dope up the entire population so they’re meek sheeple.

DA says:

#16-bobbo==yes, really.

For someone who claims to be an almighty master of words you seem to have missed the boat entirely on this one.

An apologist is someone who defends and makes excuses for someone or something, typically doctrine, religion, or dogmatic in nature. Often twisting words to fit their idea of the way things should be perceived.

It was my way of saying that you twisted what Paul meant to make excuses for lemon. Who I believe you actually think is incorrect in his analysis…I could be wrong though, I’m not gonna read through your convoluted musings on this subject again, rather I’ll just let you point out where I went so wrong, and I’m sure you will.

Sometimes you have to take what someone means, not what they say. Not everyone is a master of words.