<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uncle Dave Wants 2 Know: Abiotic (Non-fossil Generated) Oil &#8212; Is It For Real?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:43:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: opit</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1691622</link>
		<dc:creator>opit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1691622</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no scientist either. Yet I find it notable that Deepwater Horizon was the deepest hole drilled for oil - the record breaker at a depth greater than the bottom of the Marianas Trench - and they found oil past believing at insane pressures.
If I have concerns, they are more along the lines of radioactivity levels in the petroleum and associated hazards. Crude is already a toxic nightmare : the dispersant exercise in the Gulf of Mexico ups toxicity by something like 5 times. Spraying that around seems sure to cause kill lasting more than the usual 2 decades. Meanwhile the government is foisting sea products as acceptable food supply.
They do love their radioactivity. It&#039;s a wonder U.S. soldiers don&#039;t glow in the dark from DU munitions.

I live in the area of the oilpatch and have been through Fort McMurray and Fort MacKay ( and I&#039;m not going to improve on my hours-long introduction to that reproduction of Dante&#039;s Inferno in a hurry. Scuttlebutt is that Beaufort Sea and Dakotas reserves beyond need for centuries have been unreported to the public.

Now if you were a speculator....that&#039;s the sort of market control game you&#039;d play...if you could. Besides...it&#039;s a strategic war materiel : easy to game politically as has been done for decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no scientist either. Yet I find it notable that Deepwater Horizon was the deepest hole drilled for oil &#8211; the record breaker at a depth greater than the bottom of the Marianas Trench &#8211; and they found oil past believing at insane pressures.<br />
If I have concerns, they are more along the lines of radioactivity levels in the petroleum and associated hazards. Crude is already a toxic nightmare : the dispersant exercise in the Gulf of Mexico ups toxicity by something like 5 times. Spraying that around seems sure to cause kill lasting more than the usual 2 decades. Meanwhile the government is foisting sea products as acceptable food supply.<br />
They do love their radioactivity. It&#8217;s a wonder U.S. soldiers don&#8217;t glow in the dark from DU munitions.</p>
<p>I live in the area of the oilpatch and have been through Fort McMurray and Fort MacKay ( and I&#8217;m not going to improve on my hours-long introduction to that reproduction of Dante&#8217;s Inferno in a hurry. Scuttlebutt is that Beaufort Sea and Dakotas reserves beyond need for centuries have been unreported to the public.</p>
<p>Now if you were a speculator&#8230;.that&#8217;s the sort of market control game you&#8217;d play&#8230;if you could. Besides&#8230;it&#8217;s a strategic war materiel : easy to game politically as has been done for decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ...deep driller...</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1675107</link>
		<dc:creator>...deep driller...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1675107</guid>
		<description>...if oil/gas is fossilized fuel...why is there methane on other planets?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;if oil/gas is fossilized fuel&#8230;why is there methane on other planets?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ...deep driller...</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1675105</link>
		<dc:creator>...deep driller...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1675105</guid>
		<description>http://www.rense.com/general75/zoil.htm

...the true soure of oil lies under the granite..we just havent drilled (here in USA) to prove it yet...but we will...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rense.com/general75/zoil.htm" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.rense.com/general75/zoil.htm' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.rense.com/general75/zoil.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8230;the true soure of oil lies under the granite..we just havent drilled (here in USA) to prove it yet&#8230;but we will&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn E.</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672588</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 05:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672588</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a chemist. Nor do I portray one on Tv (har!). I&#039;d truly like to believe in this alternative origin of oil. But there is one snag I can&#039;t get around. Crude oil is a hydrocarbon. Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) and Iron Oxide (Fe2O3), doesn&#039;t have any Hydrogen in it. So if this theory was right about these two compounds being all that&#039;s needed to make oil. Where does the Hydrogen come from? I should think an abundance of it, would be required. Not merely a trace element of something nearby, in the earth. And unless I&#039;m mistaken, there are other elements in crude oil. Like Sulfur. Hydrocarbon compounds are pretty complex. Crude oil is &quot;cracked&quot; down into many lighter hydrocarbons, like gasoline and various solvents. So it stands to reason that crude oil is far more complex than anything that made from it, combined. And something as simple as calcium carbonate and rusty iron, isn&#039;t very likely the source. Not unless the heat and pressure of the earth&#039;s crust can magically split atoms, and make new elements.

I&#039;m not saying that crude oil must be made from fossilized plants and animals. Just that it has to be something a bit more complex than what this report claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a chemist. Nor do I portray one on Tv (har!). I&#8217;d truly like to believe in this alternative origin of oil. But there is one snag I can&#8217;t get around. Crude oil is a hydrocarbon. Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) and Iron Oxide (Fe2O3), doesn&#8217;t have any Hydrogen in it. So if this theory was right about these two compounds being all that&#8217;s needed to make oil. Where does the Hydrogen come from? I should think an abundance of it, would be required. Not merely a trace element of something nearby, in the earth. And unless I&#8217;m mistaken, there are other elements in crude oil. Like Sulfur. Hydrocarbon compounds are pretty complex. Crude oil is &#8220;cracked&#8221; down into many lighter hydrocarbons, like gasoline and various solvents. So it stands to reason that crude oil is far more complex than anything that made from it, combined. And something as simple as calcium carbonate and rusty iron, isn&#8217;t very likely the source. Not unless the heat and pressure of the earth&#8217;s crust can magically split atoms, and make new elements.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that crude oil must be made from fossilized plants and animals. Just that it has to be something a bit more complex than what this report claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672446</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672446</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a layman. How would I know if oil was abiotic? Let&#039;s say it is- if we never run out of it, won&#039;t we instead run out of whatever compounds give rise to it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a layman. How would I know if oil was abiotic? Let&#8217;s say it is- if we never run out of it, won&#8217;t we instead run out of whatever compounds give rise to it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Speight</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672401</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Speight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672401</guid>
		<description>I remember reading some thirty years or more ago a scientific paper which pointed out that the Vietnamese (I believe, could be wrong) were drilling really deep holes way below the level at which anything living could have ever been.  No fossil activity ever in the history of the earth.  This means that anything extracted could only have a chemical base, or origin and was most certainly unconnected in any way with anything which had ever had life.  What they pumped up was oil!  I have a vague memory that some Scandinavian scientists as well as American scientists were involved in this.  They most certainly wrote a long paper - most impressive and provided what seemed to me to be irrefutable evidence.
Sorry to be so vague about this, so anecdotal, but anyone interested should be able to uncover what I&#039;m talking about.  I should start with old editions of Scientific American (Oh God,  how I miss what that used to be before it became total rubbish just talking to the select few).  I&#039;m old, therefore not up on all this but it does seem to me to be far too readily accepted what oil is supposed to be.  I am a falsificationist, therefore highly suspicious of the readily accepted, the appeal to &#039;authority&#039;, the &#039;final&#039; answer.
Science is a continuously evolving subject, progressing by revealing that present knowledge is flawed, faulty and even in some cases Fawlty.
Still. It does provide a damned good living for the likes of Gore doesn&#039;t it?  Another clay footed &#039;expert&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading some thirty years or more ago a scientific paper which pointed out that the Vietnamese (I believe, could be wrong) were drilling really deep holes way below the level at which anything living could have ever been.  No fossil activity ever in the history of the earth.  This means that anything extracted could only have a chemical base, or origin and was most certainly unconnected in any way with anything which had ever had life.  What they pumped up was oil!  I have a vague memory that some Scandinavian scientists as well as American scientists were involved in this.  They most certainly wrote a long paper &#8211; most impressive and provided what seemed to me to be irrefutable evidence.<br />
Sorry to be so vague about this, so anecdotal, but anyone interested should be able to uncover what I&#8217;m talking about.  I should start with old editions of Scientific American (Oh God,  how I miss what that used to be before it became total rubbish just talking to the select few).  I&#8217;m old, therefore not up on all this but it does seem to me to be far too readily accepted what oil is supposed to be.  I am a falsificationist, therefore highly suspicious of the readily accepted, the appeal to &#8216;authority&#8217;, the &#8216;final&#8217; answer.<br />
Science is a continuously evolving subject, progressing by revealing that present knowledge is flawed, faulty and even in some cases Fawlty.<br />
Still. It does provide a damned good living for the likes of Gore doesn&#8217;t it?  Another clay footed &#8216;expert&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Patso</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672335</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Patso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672335</guid>
		<description># 6 greyangel:
&quot;We KNOW there are cleaner sources of energy. Hydroelectric and solar is real. The only thing we seem to lack is a way to store that energy that doesn’t require strip mining for rare minerals and all the disposal issues involved with throw away batteries.&quot;
 
The best idea I have seen for large scale energy storage is simply to pump water uphill. Take a nice mountain or other declivity and build two reservoirs separated by an appropriate height. While sunlight is abundant, use solar power to pump from the lower to the higher, then at night reverse the flow and run it through a hydroelectric plant. Admittedly this is problematic on the plains.
 
 - - - - -

# 35 Animby:
&quot;I have read three or four believable scenarios about the creation of abiotic oil. I have yet to read a believable theory about the mechanics of biological oil production. How did all those plants and animals collect in just the right place to get subsumed by the earth and pressured into oil? And, since it would take centuries to collect sufficient biomass, why didn’t it decay first?&quot;

Let&#039;s see. It did not involve swimming dinosaurs, as a previous poster scoffed. It involved seas, warm and not so warm, but warm enough for there to be lots of plankton, krill, algae, etc. in the layers that are lit by the sun. The Earth has always had a lot of these. Over time, these organisms die and their corpses slowly fall to the sea bed, where it&#039;s usually deep enough that there is no light and little oxygen and only sparse life. Over millions of years, this stuff piles up and gets deep, and eventually gets buried under sediment, which cuts the available oxygen to approximately zip, then more sediment and then -- more sediment! The pressure on these piles of corpses builds as the sediment builds up and eventually the temperature rises. (If you are skeptical of this process, just look up sedimentary rock and consider how much of that there is in the world. Answer -- a lot!) Once the temperature reaches about 175 to 325 degrees F (80-180 C), the organic matter undergoes pyrolysis, cooking the hydrocarbons out of the once-living matter. Higher temps can crack the molecules even further, producing gas. Once enough liquid forms, it can migrate through the rocks and occasionally it comes up against an impermeable layer and forms a pool under it -- an oil field is created! The inorganic rock left behind goes through its own transformations, becoming sandstone, limestone, marble, etc.
 
Even if you argue that such a process could take millions of years, well if it took ten million, that means it could have happened more than three hundred times since life appeared on the Earth.
 
 - - - - -
 
# 50 Al Gore Has My Hamster:
&quot;The point that is never addressed is that any acceptable new energy source must be American standard of living neutral.&quot;
 
Sorry. Ain&#039;t gonna happen, unless that big fusion breakthrough happens in the next five years. (The fusion establishment has been saying &quot;Fusion us just 25 years away!&quot; for the last sixty years.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 6 greyangel:<br />
&#8220;We KNOW there are cleaner sources of energy. Hydroelectric and solar is real. The only thing we seem to lack is a way to store that energy that doesn’t require strip mining for rare minerals and all the disposal issues involved with throw away batteries.&#8221;</p>
<p>The best idea I have seen for large scale energy storage is simply to pump water uphill. Take a nice mountain or other declivity and build two reservoirs separated by an appropriate height. While sunlight is abundant, use solar power to pump from the lower to the higher, then at night reverse the flow and run it through a hydroelectric plant. Admittedly this is problematic on the plains.</p>
<p> &#8211; - &#8211; - -</p>
<p># 35 Animby:<br />
&#8220;I have read three or four believable scenarios about the creation of abiotic oil. I have yet to read a believable theory about the mechanics of biological oil production. How did all those plants and animals collect in just the right place to get subsumed by the earth and pressured into oil? And, since it would take centuries to collect sufficient biomass, why didn’t it decay first?&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see. It did not involve swimming dinosaurs, as a previous poster scoffed. It involved seas, warm and not so warm, but warm enough for there to be lots of plankton, krill, algae, etc. in the layers that are lit by the sun. The Earth has always had a lot of these. Over time, these organisms die and their corpses slowly fall to the sea bed, where it&#8217;s usually deep enough that there is no light and little oxygen and only sparse life. Over millions of years, this stuff piles up and gets deep, and eventually gets buried under sediment, which cuts the available oxygen to approximately zip, then more sediment and then &#8212; more sediment! The pressure on these piles of corpses builds as the sediment builds up and eventually the temperature rises. (If you are skeptical of this process, just look up sedimentary rock and consider how much of that there is in the world. Answer &#8212; a lot!) Once the temperature reaches about 175 to 325 degrees F (80-180 C), the organic matter undergoes pyrolysis, cooking the hydrocarbons out of the once-living matter. Higher temps can crack the molecules even further, producing gas. Once enough liquid forms, it can migrate through the rocks and occasionally it comes up against an impermeable layer and forms a pool under it &#8212; an oil field is created! The inorganic rock left behind goes through its own transformations, becoming sandstone, limestone, marble, etc.</p>
<p>Even if you argue that such a process could take millions of years, well if it took ten million, that means it could have happened more than three hundred times since life appeared on the Earth.</p>
<p> &#8211; - &#8211; - -</p>
<p># 50 Al Gore Has My Hamster:<br />
&#8220;The point that is never addressed is that any acceptable new energy source must be American standard of living neutral.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry. Ain&#8217;t gonna happen, unless that big fusion breakthrough happens in the next five years. (The fusion establishment has been saying &#8220;Fusion us just 25 years away!&#8221; for the last sixty years.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevo</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672332</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672332</guid>
		<description>#51, let&#039;s play &quot;Spot the logical fallacy.&quot;   

Answer: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Argument_from_authority

No geologist thinks that oil derives from dinosaurs...and also the rocks where oil is found are usually not the rocks where it formed.  Oil is a fluid and migrates through permeable rocks (or to the surface, to cite an example in the news)  Source rock formations associated with oil deposits are always marine rock, usually basins in areas of high plankton productivity.  Gazillions of dead microorganisms over many thousands of years drift down to the bottom of the basin, where decay is very slow or absent due to low oxygen content, and end up incorporated in the sediments, and eventually end up turning into oil.  (Algae seems to produce gas fields, though)

Oil does tend to migrate upwards and can be trapped in sandstones laid down by rivers---doesn&#039;t mean it forms from fossils in river beds.

The comment about how many dinosaurs are required also show a lack of appreciation for the scale of geologic time:  it&#039;s BIG.  The Karoo basin in Africa is estimated to contain trillions of skeletal fossils of mammal-like reptiles from the Permian era, before the time of the dinosaurs. (no oil in these terrestial sedisments)

Hydrocarbons from organic sources have a certain &quot;handedness&quot; that inorganic hydrocarbons lack...and guess what petroleum has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#51, let&#8217;s play &#8220;Spot the logical fallacy.&#8221;   </p>
<p>Answer: <a href="https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Argument_from_authority" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Argument_from_authority' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Argument_from_authority</a></p>
<p>No geologist thinks that oil derives from dinosaurs&#8230;and also the rocks where oil is found are usually not the rocks where it formed.  Oil is a fluid and migrates through permeable rocks (or to the surface, to cite an example in the news)  Source rock formations associated with oil deposits are always marine rock, usually basins in areas of high plankton productivity.  Gazillions of dead microorganisms over many thousands of years drift down to the bottom of the basin, where decay is very slow or absent due to low oxygen content, and end up incorporated in the sediments, and eventually end up turning into oil.  (Algae seems to produce gas fields, though)</p>
<p>Oil does tend to migrate upwards and can be trapped in sandstones laid down by rivers&#8212;doesn&#8217;t mean it forms from fossils in river beds.</p>
<p>The comment about how many dinosaurs are required also show a lack of appreciation for the scale of geologic time:  it&#8217;s BIG.  The Karoo basin in Africa is estimated to contain trillions of skeletal fossils of mammal-like reptiles from the Permian era, before the time of the dinosaurs. (no oil in these terrestial sedisments)</p>
<p>Hydrocarbons from organic sources have a certain &#8220;handedness&#8221; that inorganic hydrocarbons lack&#8230;and guess what petroleum has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josiah</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672309</link>
		<dc:creator>Josiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 04:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672309</guid>
		<description>&quot;The suggestion that petroleum might have arisen from some transformation of squashed fish or biological detritus is surely the silliest notion to have been entertained by substantial numbers of persons over an extended period of time.&quot; — Fred Hoyle, 1982</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The suggestion that petroleum might have arisen from some transformation of squashed fish or biological detritus is surely the silliest notion to have been entertained by substantial numbers of persons over an extended period of time.&#8221; — Fred Hoyle, 1982</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Gore Has My Hamster</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672300</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Gore Has My Hamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672300</guid>
		<description>The point that is never addressed is that any acceptable new energy source must be American standard of living neutral. Smart cars, mass transit and urban living don&#039;t cut it. If you&#039;re less evolved and OK with that horror, go for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point that is never addressed is that any acceptable new energy source must be American standard of living neutral. Smart cars, mass transit and urban living don&#8217;t cut it. If you&#8217;re less evolved and OK with that horror, go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgp</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672285</link>
		<dc:creator>cgp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672285</guid>
		<description>Maybe, so where is this deep drill pipe and what does its chemical analysis say?  

This idea could be just as hopeful as the green revolution is. Lets put some research funds into it.  Say like those dollars the idiots stopped placing on magnetic confined fusion, which those idiots took off the energy policy.

What a 25 per cent depletion rate for the mex gulf holes! The saudi coverup of Garwar field depletion and their screwing it with pumping.

Its the end times for fossil fuels, get thinking about mammoth nuke generators with onsite fuel processing. They could make car fuel (hydrogen somehow contained) at a profitable 5 cents an equivalent gas gallon.

Those giant wind turbines costs have been lied about. They have availabilites of 5 to 10 percent (due to high wind speed start ups). Go try to ask for availability info from their owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe, so where is this deep drill pipe and what does its chemical analysis say?  </p>
<p>This idea could be just as hopeful as the green revolution is. Lets put some research funds into it.  Say like those dollars the idiots stopped placing on magnetic confined fusion, which those idiots took off the energy policy.</p>
<p>What a 25 per cent depletion rate for the mex gulf holes! The saudi coverup of Garwar field depletion and their screwing it with pumping.</p>
<p>Its the end times for fossil fuels, get thinking about mammoth nuke generators with onsite fuel processing. They could make car fuel (hydrogen somehow contained) at a profitable 5 cents an equivalent gas gallon.</p>
<p>Those giant wind turbines costs have been lied about. They have availabilites of 5 to 10 percent (due to high wind speed start ups). Go try to ask for availability info from their owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guyver</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672271</link>
		<dc:creator>Guyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672271</guid>
		<description>Discussed a couple of years ago:  http://tinyurl.com/6poqwz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discussed a couple of years ago:  <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6poqwz" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/6poqwz' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/6poqwz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gypkap</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672259</link>
		<dc:creator>gypkap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672259</guid>
		<description>#45: Very little additional mass gets added to the Earth over the ages, and most of that comes from meteorites and an occasional comet. Almost nothing comes from the Sun. 

To rephrase a line from a famous movie, &quot;These aren&#039;t the oil sources you&#039;re looking for, move along.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#45: Very little additional mass gets added to the Earth over the ages, and most of that comes from meteorites and an occasional comet. Almost nothing comes from the Sun. </p>
<p>To rephrase a line from a famous movie, &#8220;These aren&#8217;t the oil sources you&#8217;re looking for, move along.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672146</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672146</guid>
		<description>our stupidity.. priceless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>our stupidity.. priceless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/07/07/uncle-dave-wants-2-know-abiotic-non-fossil-generated-oil-is-it-for-real/comment-page-3/#comment-1672144</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=75680#comment-1672144</guid>
		<description>present physical mass is inherent. future mass from the sun is gonna be free</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>present physical mass is inherent. future mass from the sun is gonna be free</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

