Read the whole article for a number of fascinating examples of how you are easily manipulated by this. And you know politicians, the military, talk show hosts and many others are using this to sway public opinion, too.
The Misconception: You rationally analyze all factors before making a choice or determining value. The Truth: Your first perception lingers in your mind, affecting later perceptions and decisions.
[...]
In 1974, Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman conducted a study asking a similar question. They asked people to estimate how many African countries were part of the United Nations, but first they spun a wheel of fortune.The wheel was painted with numbers from 0 to 100, but rigged to always land on 10 or 65. When the arrow stopped spinning, they asked the person in the experiment to say if they believed the percentage of countries was higher or lower than the number on the wheel.
They then asked people to estimate what they thought the actual percentage of nations was. They found people who landed on 10 in the first half of the experiment guessed around 25 percent of Africa was part of the U.N. Those who landed on 65 said around 45 percent. They had been locked in place by the anchoring effect.
[...]
When shopping for a car, you know it isn’t a completely honest transaction. The real price is probably lower than what they are asking for on the window sticker, yet the anchor price is still going to affect your decision.
Isn’t the “anchor price” the same as the “MSRP”?
It’s not just with pricing. When they do these “unbiased” surveys. They often express the question with biased choices. For example a poll about abortion rights could be worded as, “Do you believe innocent babies should be killed?” Or “Do you believe victims of a violent rape, should be forced to bear their offenders child?”
You see, it can be biased emotionally either way. And pollsters with a political and/or religious agenda, often do. Unapologetically.
Even your local Tv news channels pull this crap. Especially, if they’re with FOX.
Sorry bobby-o, just got back.
I meant to say that while the signals may be conscious, the drive or felt need is unconscious.People make choices intentionally and un- semi- or fully aware of why, and rarely question their own motives – and in fact defend their motives with great zeal.
We are apes I tell ya, but apes with at least the possibility of self awareness.It’s a lot of bother but worth it I believe.
BTW, I would NEVER suggest that you were actually wrong.
This signaling can have its benefits, but is also highly inefficient. Example: shuffling everybody off to college so that they can be “more competitive” to eventually take jobs that never required more than a high school education 20 years ago is a huge waste of resources, inflates the minimum requirements for employment, and locks people who lacked the opportunity for college out of the job market.