Alfred1 says:

Seems like the normal Democrat to me.

Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) is afraid that the U.S. Territory of Guam is going to “tip over and capsize” due to overpopulation.

These are the folks who now control our health care, GM, oil, wall street…etc

How happy happy happy are we.

The candidate should do well among Democrats…he is one of them.

Alfred1 says:

Rush Limbaugh just made an excellent point, using CNN polling data…Birthers are less than 20% of the population, Democrats label them cazies…

But supporters of Iman Obama’s mosque at ground zero, are also about 20% of the population…

Are they crazies?

Misanthropic Scott says:

#3 – Alfred1,

Rush Limbaugh just made an excellent point

When the Kool-Aid smells like almonds, don’t drink it.

http://tinyurl.com/3d9kbs

jbenson2 says:

That is a catchy ad. I bet the recall numbers will be high.

And a 2-term limit promise as well!

revdjenk says:

the can contained maple syrup ? a Vermont product

Benjamin says:

It seemed to me like an Old Spice commercial on a cheaper budget. Of course I watched it without sound. Not crazy though.

Guyver says:

10, NoYourGod,

The 20% birthers are oblivious to the evidence put in front of their faces.

The thing that fuels the birthers is the lack of an actual birth certificate being provided along with Obama spending millions to ensure his school records and other such things are kept private. People can come to their own conclusions over his motivations.

The 20% for the community center have a concept of separation of church and state and the Constitution,

The original intent was to prevent a Church of the United States. It was a one way street. It was originally okay to have religion influences onto the government.

Do you think that other 80% would really care or complain if it were a christian community center going up in that location?

This atheist sees right through the antics of the Mosque: http://tinyurl.com/38fonon

Regardless of how you wish to spin things, the point Alfred1 / Rush seem to be making is how double standards are applied to people in the fringe.

Guyver says:

14, Monster’s Lawyer,

You were making passable sense until you cited Rush and Alfonzo. The only conclusion is that you are a dumbass too.

Wow! A liberal who considers himself an intellectual coming to a hasty conclusion. Typical.

You SEEM to have a poor understanding over what exactly I QUOTED versus what I thought SEEMED to be their point.

Guyver says:

16, Bobbo,

1==You don’t think the Puke’s fully checked out the birth certificate? Birthers won’t be satisfied until the original document is placed in each one of their hands, and then forgery would still be claimed. Silly.

2==School Records is a different issue. I’ve not seen that much about it but don’t care much either. I don’t care what they show. Same with McCane.

I think there’s more important things than to obsess whether or not Chairman Obama is natural born. The only interesting caveat I see is the level of effort put forth to prevent full disclosure on what should otherwise be a non-issue.

4==re building Mosque at ground zero==nice link but to me the issue is not a mosque at ground zero but for all the reasons given a mosque ANYWHERE in the usa. Islam is a political threat to the usa with religion as only the point of the spear.

Until you can disqualify it as a religion, then we are limited in how we can address the issue. This problem will only grow since muslim families have fare more children than their host country’s citizens. The Europeans are finding out the hard way (which is why you don’t see the French making big stands against Islam).

the only point of comparison between these two “fringe” groups is the fact they are about 20% of those polled? No other equivalency exists.

If that’s how you choose to see it. You aren’t by any chance in that 20%?

Guyver says:

18, Bobbo,

“Its a floor wax and a mouth wash!” I guess you “The Constitution really is a suicide pact” really can’t juggle two balls at one time. Just grab one ball, or the other, and become a fringe element?

The Constitution isn’t a suicide pact, but that doesn’t stop liberals from believing it needs to be reinterpreted for things like expanding the power of the Federal Government in spite of its enumerated powers.

It is a challenge though to try to figure out how to implement a political test that would get to the anti-civilization tenets of the governmental policy end of the Muslims without also attacking the C’s, P’s, and J’s. Oh well, when dealing with religion, hypocrisy has always been a valuable tool.

Perhaps for starters, our government should stop playing favorites. From what I hear, NYC had the mosque building application on the “fast track” while concurrently denying a Christian church from rebuilding their church destroyed during 9/11 via red tape.

And the C_P&J’s have always been hypocrites.

So all C, P, & J’s are hypocrites? Hasty generalization?

I love the crap that issues forth with some bishop tries to excommunicate a good catholic who presides over the abortion statutes. The bishop is absolute RIGHT. Make the hypocrite politician choose: God or Mammon?

And people freely change religions when they don’t identify with what their current religion.

I don’t like flitting from subject to subject with the mere word of hypocrisy as the link, but it feels right.

Where’s the hypocrisy?

I am in the 20% that says “right now” the constitutional law on the subject of religion and “existential threats to the Constitution” are not established enough so that TODAY there is no legal basis to deny the building permit at ground zero===but for all the reasons advanced against it, all mosques everywhere in the West should be likewise banned.

You cannot make a law covering every unforeseen future event.

The area can be re-zoned and/or the permit can be rescinded and forced to comply with normal application procedures for starters.

Maybe the mere act of having the mosque open up on 9/11 can be construed as inciting violence when you take what they’re doing contextually within their religion. What are the rights of a person or group to incite violence in this country?