bmorebadboy says:

bobbo- yes libertarians, anarchists, freedom lovers tend to be a disagreeable lot because we aren’t mindless sheep who look around searching for leaders to tell us what to do and when to do it. Instead of being collectivists trying to look for ways to agree, we tend to prefer to put aside our agreements as common sense and focus on our disagreements, in an unending search for the truth.

So, with the cop pulling you over, it’s up to that individual cop’s discretion on what is reasonable suspicion, right? One cop may feel reasonable suspicion is someone driving quickly and swerving from lane to lane. Another one might think it’s a black person driving a nice car. In either case, you’re required to stop, hand over your PAPERS, and comply with his demands. Is that reasonable to you?

Well, with the filming of people on public property, the problem is public property. Public property is property owned by the public, this unclear definition of ownership which is slippery to pin down. Since I partly own this property, because my taxes go to pay for it, don’t I get to do what I want on it? Since you also own it, don’t you get to do what you want on it? Many complications arise because we are FORCED by the government to pay for it. Unlike a private park, eg Disneyland, where the owners make the rules, and you pay when and if you decide to go there, and once you enter you’ve agreed to follow the rules the owner sets. If the owner says you must allow yourself to be filmed, then you either comply, or find a competing park with rules according to your liking. No force involved.

The Monster's Lawyer says:

If you ever have to go before a judge, traffic ticket, etc… Try using the “well, you see, I was having a bad day” argument. That would be fun to watch.