A judge has denied a request for President Barack Obama to testify at a court martial for a U.S. Army flight surgeon who refused to deploy to Afghanistan until he saw proof that Obama was born in the United States.

The judge, Army Col. Denise Lind, said any evidence or witnesses related to Obama’s citizenship is irrelevant to the charges against Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who has 17 years of service in the U.S. military…

In addition to putting Obama on their witness list, Lakin’s lawyers had asked Lind to order Obama’s official birth records from Hawaii be brought to court for trial…

The judge ruled that the matter of Obama’s eligibility is not relevant because he did not give any orders in the case. She pointed out that while the president is commander-in-chief of the military, it is Congress that is constitutionally empowered to raise armies, pay them and equip them…

Lind also said that military law says that a soldier’s personal beliefs or convictions are not sufficient to allow that soldier to determine that an order is illegal. The soldier has to have “no rational doubt” that the order is illegal before he or she can ignore it.

Finally she ruled that a military court martial is not the forum in which to determine a president’s eligibility, because the Constitution says only Congress has the power to impeach and remove the president.

Another sect where ideology overwhelms material reality.




  1. Alfred Persson says:

    #40 Why advertise in two newspapers, why not just one?

  2. Alfred Persson says:

    A retraction. Evidently news paper announcements are done automatically from information provided by the state…therefore my question “why” is irrelevant.

    However, as this site points out, the anouncements are generated by receiving the cert. of live birth, which does not require proof the child was born in the USA

    http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104678

  3. Alfred Persson says:

    [b]“Is it wrong for a man to love another man?”[/b]

    Evidently not on this blog.

    The more you folks try to ridicule Birthers, the more people wonder “where is the Birth certificate that ends the controversy.”

    Where are the facts, the hospital records of his birth.

    Where are the neighbors who can testify he lived there…

    Where….etc.

  4. tcc3 says:

    Those devious bastards!

  5. Tippis says:

    #39 Alfred Persson
    “Authentic live birth cert., which begs the question, as one could have been obtained, after giving birth in Kenya.

    No one checked to see if the child was actually born in the USA.”

    …the problem is that being born in the USA is completely irrelevant, what matters is being “a natural born Citizen”, and your actual place of birth is not a factor for determining this. You can be born on Sedna and still be eligible.

  6. tcc3 says:

    Where are the Republican opponents who would do anything to tear him down to win an election….oh that’s right even McCain said this was BS.

    Seems like the RNC, the McCain campaign, and the Clinton campaign would have jumped at the chance to invalidate his candidacy, if there was any truth to this.

  7. Alfred Persson says:

    #45 Good point…I haven’t followed this controversy much.

    I think it can be empirically proven he is an alien, whether from another planet or country is unknown, but alien nonetheless.

    Even his mannerisms seem acted out to mimic American gestures…but they seem unnatural to him..

    Alien body language oozes from his persona…

    Why body language expert Tonya Reiman hasn’t been tapped to analyze this might be a bigger conspiracy than his missing birth certificate.

  8. Tim Berners-Lee says:

    Angle brackets Alfred Persson. This ain’t no hokey markup bs, but the real thing.

    If you knew how to do basic HTML then you’d know that Barack Obama is actually a godless Korean communist who’s DNA has been adjusted to make him look black after they bred him in an axolotl tank from the stolen cells of Richard Nixon taken during his 1972 China visit.

  9. Alfred Persson says:

    #48 Wow…all the ambiguity resolved, nagging details explained…outstanding.

    No wonder Kim Jong-il sorta has the same swaggering gait…

    Can’t wait to the same economic policies that made N Korea the powerhouse it is, are fully brought to the US!

  10. Alfred Persson says:

    Is it wrong for a man to love another man?

    Not here.

    #48 I know it might be misconstrued as irreverent towards our fearless and articulate Leader…

    But from what part of Nixon’s body was the dna harvested?

  11. McCullough says:

    But Alfred…don’t you love Jesus?

  12. Alfred Persson says:

    #51 McCullough, the man with child bearing lips…

    Do you still make music rubbing your back legs together?

  13. deowll says:

    Well that troll worked. ?8^)

    “Another sect where ideology overwhelms material reality.”

    In the context in which this sentence is given a person must know you rather well in order to be sure about the group to which you refer when you use the word sect.

  14. Granite says:

    Re: “Completely ignores the material reality that Obama has used every legal means to prevent public access to his birth certificate.”

    Answer: That is false. Obama has already posted the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, and the facts on it were confirmed twice by the officials of the Department of Health and Department of Vital Records of Hawaii, and by the governor of Hawaii.

    Hawaii does not now and did not in 1961 allow a birth document of any kind to be issued that indicated birth in Hawaii unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii. Obama’s published birth certificate says on it that he was born in Hawaii, and that is the fact that the officials have repeatedly confirmed.

    Re: “every legal means to prevent public access to his birth certificate.”

    Answer: That is a myth because THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A LAWSUIT AGAINST OBAMA FOR HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE OR FOR DOCUMENTS. Virtually all the lawsuits were to stop the election. Then there were lawsuits to stop the Electoral College from voting and the Congress from certifying the election and to stop the Inauguration. There never was a lawsuit just for the birth certificate or just for documents. In our system you have to defend against all lawsuits, no matter how stupid.

    Re: The notices in the newspapers were generated by the filing of government documents.

    Answer; That is true. But in Hawaii in 1961, those documents would only be filed for a birth IN HAWAII. At the time Hawaii did not allow a birth that had occurred outside of Hawaii to be registered at all. Not AT ALL.

    In the first of the two confirmations, the officials said that there is an official birth certificate in Obama’s file. Since no foreign (not even another state’s) birth certificate could be filed, the original must be a Hawaiian birth certificate. In the second of two confirmations, the officials said that the document in the files VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii. In addition to the verification by the officials, there is this witness, who recalls being told of Obama’s birth in Hawaii in 1961.

    Also, Obama’s kenyan grandmother never said that he was born in Kenya. She said repeatedly in the taped interview that he was born in Hawaii, and she said in another interview that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama’s birth was in a letter from Hawaii.

  15. TellerLP says:

    Re: “Authentic live birth cert., which begs the question, as one could have been obtained, after giving birth in Kenya.”

    Answer. That is not possible. In 1961, Hawaii did not allow foreign birth certificates or even birth certificates from other states to be filed. So, the birth certificate in the files CANNOT be from another country.

    And it did not then and does not now allow a birth document of any kind to be issued that said “born in Hawaii” on it, unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii. Obama’s says on it “born in Hawaii,” and that is the fact that the officials in Hawaii have confirmed twice and most recently the governor of Hawaii did too.

    By the way, Obama’s Kenyan grandmother never said that he was born in Kenya. She said repeatedly in the taped interview that he was born in Hawaii. (Most birther sites cut off the tape just before she is asked the question “Where was he born?” to which she replies Hawaii several times.) And, she said in another interview that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama’s birth was in a letter from Hawaii.

  16. TellerLP says:

    Re: “…the anouncements are generated by receiving the cert. of live birth, which does not require proof the child was born in the USA.’

    Answer. At the time that Obama was born Hawaii did not allow a foreign birth certificate to be filed AT ALL. So the document that generated the announcement cannot have been a foreign birth certificate. Only a birth certificate issued in Hawaii could generate the announcement.

    IN addition, we know that the document in the files says on it that Obama was born in Hawaii because the officials in Hawaii in their second confirmation said that the original VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii.

  17. Alfred Persson says:

    #54 I’m not a birther, its entirely possible he was born in the US…

    He has all the characteristics of an American, except its love for freedom and private enterprise.

    One thing is certain, Obama never saw a Republican belt he couldn’t hit below.

  18. ArianeB says:

    Do we have to continue with this crap?

    Every “birther” is a RACIST!! Plain and simple, end of story. Obama is an American, there is overwhelming proof online, and anyone who fails to believe it is purposely being ignorant and irrational.

    Racism is also based on ignorance and irrationality, so already they are in the same neighborhood. But then when you add in stuff about him being a secret African Muslim, etc. It all adds up to a “Newspeak”: Questioning Obama’s origins = Obama is Black!

    Racism is alive and well, especially in the GOP. The “birther” movement pulled the covers off and revealed the facts.

  19. Granite says:

    Re: “and for as long as I can remember I’ve had to produce an original birth certificate on the odd occasion, and the one I use in a contemporary 1961-issue certificate. When I got a passport in the 1980s, I needed it. When I got my drivers license in the 1970s, I needed it. When I lost my Social Security card in the 90s, I needed it. I think my parents needed it back in 68 to get my SSN. ”

    Answer: The Certification of Live Birth is the OFFICIAL birth certificate, and it is used by thousands of people every year to get all the things that you mention.

    Moreover, the so called ‘birther bill,” the draft legislation sponsored by about seven Republicans that calls for future candidates to prove their birth in the USA, calls for the OFFICIAL birth certificate, not the original one.

  20. jccalhoun says:

    I asked it earlier but I’ll ask it again: Where’s George W Bush’s birth certificate? Where’s Bill Clinton’s? Where’s any other president’s?

    I want proof that any president ever has even been born at all.

    As far as needing your birth certificate, the only birth certificate I’ve ever had is a orange/yellow piece of paper with “birth certificate” on it, my birth info typed into the blanks on the form, a stamp from the county clerk and a seal from a notary. It could be forged in about 10 minutes. It looks a lot more unofficial than Obama’s and it has gotten me a driver’s license and passport.



Bad Behavior has blocked 25411 access attempts in the last 7 days.