Dvorak Uncensored Exclusive!
Everyone knows that the party who doesn’t have the presidency loses seats in the midterm elections and therefore everyone THINKS the REPUBLICANS are going to gain seats. But the Obama administration and the DEMOCRATS have a surprise for the REPUBLICANS! Their SECRET PLAN is now REVEALED!
Obama is going to announce that he’s going to CHANGE PARTIES and become a REPUBLICAN! That way the party in power will be the REPUBLICANS and the DEMOCRATS can run against the establishment!
Realizing from recent polls that voters have SHORT MEMORIES, the Dems think they can pull it off. After all, the voters and the political pundits have proven voters can’t remember back two years ago. A recent poll asked voters, “Do you think that ignorance and apathy are major problems in America” – 90% of voters responded, “I don’t know and I don’t give a damn!”
After the election Obama will change back to being a Democrat and no one will remember it ever happened. Republican strategist Frank Lutz said, “Republicans should be worried. A plan this wacky just might work.”
Remember – you heard it here FIRST on DVORAK UNCENSORED!
Here’s what will happen:
The Republicans will win in November, getting control of both the House and Senate – but not enough to over-ride a veto.
Then, the Republicans will spend an entire year trying to pass tax cuts for the rich. Obama will veto them.
The end result: By 2012 Obama will seem like a “reasonable” alternative to Republican nutbars and he will be re-elected.
2013: USA attacks Iran.
JMAN, the super stooge: you blather: “and he’s added more to the national debt in 19 months than all presidents- Washington through Reagan combined” /// And why stop at Raygun? Could it be because Clinton had a surplus and BushtheRetard also added more to the national debt in 8 year than all presidents- Washington through Reagan combined, and so BushtheRetards record can’t be added to the total?
Yes the stooges of the world will play with themselves/err-shit!!/no==with themselves and call it politics.
It is embarrassing to watch. Of course, the Dems and Pukes have differences: the difference between tax and spend to benefit the middle class, and deficit and spend to benefit the SUPER RICH, but other than that, they are pathetically the same and blaming one over the other is a stooges policy to keep the ball rolling that way.
VOTE ALL INCUMBENTS OUT OF OFFICE.
He can’t change parties, those dastardly Republicans will demand to see his birth certificate…
killing the scheme before it even gets started.
They are geniuses.
Maybe Obama will resign and run for mayor of Chicago, which was his life goal ten years ago.
It’s really too bad so many sheeple put their faith in parties. Not that it really matters really fixing the system crossed the point of no return a long time ago.
#25 right on
It’s the biggest F’up in the constitution to not have outlawed special interests groups from governing. The founding fathers were afraid of possible fractionating but didn’t address it in the constitution. Now we are stuck with parties.
It is R and D voters who are responsible for the mess we are in. Basic and simple logic. They are the bosses. There is no guarantee that a third party would be different, but we don’t know that. I say never vote for a D or R ever again until we know that it doesn’t matter who is in charge. This is basic and simple logic too.
18, Bobbo,
They got universal health care through didn’t they? In fact they shoved it through.
AGREED (as well as anyone who believes in redistributing wealth or taxing our way to prosperity).
19, JMan,
There’s no such thing as a free lunch.
and
22, Bobbo,
Obama’s stimulus plan cost more than the Iraq War: http://tinyurl.com/33xhefz
21, Chuck,
There’s no need to over-ride a veto when the only thing a Republican-controlled Congress needs to do with respect to health care is to not fund it (effectively eliminating the health care bill until a conservative / libertarian takes the White House).
The problem with voting out the incumbents is what do you get in return? Missouri has term limits, what it has managed to do is take a somewhat dysfunctional system and make it totally dysfunctional. Every one is so bent on their own self interest due to the short time in office nothing gets done. You end up in the same place gridlock.
Clancy–term limits is not the same thing as VOTE ALL INCUMBENTS OUT OF OFFICE, unless the term limit is “1.” And I will even accept that “at first” it may cause problems WORSE THAN the status quo==thats what happens when the revolution occurs. It is only a “hope” that doing the only thing we can do will eventually have an impact on what is now entirely impacted. CHANGE!!!!!! I doubt every state will have the same experience as any other state. Personalities and electorate are different.
My idea is full of holes. I welcome a discussion of any better alternative but there is nothing we as the sheep can do. Can’t change the constitution to have a parlimentary style of government. Can’t mandate public financing. Can’t overturn the Sup Ct saying money is speech or that corps are people too.
All we can do is: VOTE ALL INCUMBENTS OUT OF OFFICE.
#2 You wanted him. You ate the “change” manure. Now, deal with it.
#30–Pedrotito==you barf: “#2 You wanted him. You ate the “change” manure. Now, deal with it.” /// Nice combo there: all hostility without a clear idea at all. I never vote “for” a candidate because it is always obvious they are all corrupt packaged products and you can’t believe a thing they say. Even in hind sight though, Obama remains head and shoulders the better candidate than anything the Pukes could field then or now.
Was it a change from BushtheRetard?===of course.
Was it a change from the regurgitated vomit the Pukes had given us and were offering again?===of course.
Was it the change I wanted?===of course not. I am to the left of and right of Obama.
Poor Pedtotito==such a tool of the Pukes, you can’t perceive of politics except thru the lens of the two parties?????
Stupid Human.
#13 clever? No. clever people try to build up their base of support rather than tear it down with slanders and slurs made at the expense of others.
Of course if you actually believe what you said that is even less clever. None of the people I know that oppose Obama care about his race.
They care about jobs and they have observed that the only way Obama can think of to create jobs is to put people to work for the government.
They care about the fact that Obama and his Congressional supporters are the biggest wastrel spenders in the history of the nation. Wastrel because the return to the people on the money spent is ludicrous.
The 20% pay raise on average they gave Fed employees bought us what? Fed employees are making way more than none Fed employees for the same jobs.
That cap and trade is a huge energy tax designed to make some people rich while shafting the public.
That the biggest heath care reform package in history lacked tort reform, didn’t allow insurance to be sold across state lines, is going to make the cost of insurance go up for everybody who had insurance and is only by the wildest flights of the imagination economically sound.
The entire social safety net was heading for disaster before that bill was passed and the day of reckoning is now going to be a lot sooner.
Fanny May and Freddie Mac are still making bad loans.
He killed one Hades of lot of jobs down on the gulf.
I’m sure there are many other reasons for not liking what has been going on with Congress and Obama but those make my list.
Clinton enjoys a great economy and a surplus and Reagan gets the credit. The Economy goes down the tank and shows no sign if recovery during all 8 of the Bush years and it’s Clintons fault. We would hear this over and over from sources like FOX New and other conservative media.
Obama was President for less then 3 months before I heard the same sources blaming the job market on him and calling Progressives out for the “blame Bush card.”. The hypocrisy is absurd.
We have been concerned that the Administration’s legislative proposal regarding the GSEs would weaken affordable housing performance by the GSEs, by emphasizing only safety and soundness. While the GSEs’ affordable housing mission is not in any way incompatible with their safety and soundness, an exclusive focus on safety and soundness is likely to come, in practice, at the expense of affordable housing.
The above is from a letter sent by Democrats to President Bush in 2004.
The government has entirely failed us.
Don’t transfer power back to the states, those have failed us too!
Transfer power back to the municipalities. That’s the only hope that remains.
Vote Jeb Bush & Liz Cheney 2012!
dear bobbo who worships obama and clinton….
there was NO clinton surplus, only the fuzzy math that Dems are famous for
http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16
31, Bobbo,
Ohio Poll: Voters Say They Would Rather Have Bush As President than Obama By 50-42 Margin: http://tinyurl.com/2fcenvd
And Ohio is a Democrat-leaning state.
Again, I ask all the conservatives here. When will it be right for your party to take some blame? Everything that went wrong during the Bush years were blamed on Clinton. Over and over again I heard that, even up to Bush’s last days. Here we are, only two years into Obama’s administration and it’s wrong to place some of the blame for our economy and jobless rate on the former administration?
When? When will your party acknowledge some fault?
39, JMRouse,
To my knowledge, I have never heard Bush blame anything on Clinton while Bush was in office.
Obama has been quite candid about blaming the “previous 8 years” in a number of his speeches. He’s got a different style of “leadership” and what would refer to as responsibility.
In other words, his failures are not his fault.
Regardless of who is president, presidents have little to no direct influence on our economy except for tax policies. Congress is the most influential in how our economy sinks or swims.
Speaking of jobless rates, do you suppose raising taxes on those making more than $250k will help to reduce the jobless rate or do you suppose it will raise it as small job providers (those making $250k or more) will reduce their staff?
As for Republicans taking responsibility for their actions, I do hear a lot of them being quite candid their spending. So what exactly are you looking for?