The interview took place on the 23rd of September. Part two is below.
Syndicate
Subscribe to Main Blog feed here:
Subscribe to Comments too (below):
Subscribe to Main Blog feed here:
Subscribe to Comments too (below):
Bad Behavior has blocked 25396 access attempts in the last 7 days.
Folks? Who are you?
Well, that was interesting… not to mention fun watching poor Bill O’Reilly trying to tread water.
I think I share Stewart’s looks of exasperation pretty much summed up my own feelings.
No idea. I’m an extremist who cannot believe any thinking person disagrees with her.
Wow. I always knew O’Reilly was an ignorant douchebag, but he really shows it on these clips. He should go back to hosting goofy-ass shows like Inside Edition, or whichever one it was. He can take his two-bit radio DJ, Glenn Beck, with him.
i think they mean “the folked”…. there are plenty of those in all walks of life in america.
funny thing how peoples personal views change the way they see things
I saw Stewart as evasive and condescending. He never answered a single question and it is obvious it loathes the very ground O’Rielly walks on.
but at the same time O’Rielly loathes him also. I found the interview to be a complete waste of time, nothing was said nothing was learned , 20 min of my life ill never get back
I love these Stewart OReilly interviews. They are always fun and I get the impression they don’t really dislike each other.
Having said that, Stewart always eats the guys lunch. OReilly has to keep his “conservative demigod” front going the whole time while Stewart is, as he is always, the man of reason.
When O’Reilly says “folks” and “people who don’t watch your show” he means “old white people” because those are the people that don’t watch the Daily Show and who do watch Fox News. And of course instead of admitting that “folks” watch the Daily Show, O’Reilly doesn’t miss a chance to call them dope smokers. Fox Watchers=Folks and Daily Show Watchers=Dope Smokers… You are either with me or against me…
#8 there’s an entire code language they use….used by all of them from the pundits to the “analysts” to the newsreader-bimbos themselves, who are supposed to be reading news.
I thought Bill dissed Stewart and his book, although its clear he is joking around and maybe its an understanding they both have.
Perhaps for catching Fox with its pants down more than once.
Bill will be on his show, giving John a chance at revenge.
Still the dissing of John’s book, which I am now interested in, was overdone…I thought at the end, he would comment favorably on something in it…and he didn’t.
O’Reilly “separates” himself from the “folks” by referring to them as “folks” and “these people”.
He’s a rich white guy. So is Stewart. Obama is a rich black guy.
It’s funny when O’Reilly refers to Stewart’s “Manhattan” attitude. What does that mean? There are 6 million people living in the borough of Manhattan — they don’t all make $1million a year!
This would have been great to watch if it hadn’t been buffering or stuttering.
This is why streaming is still not ready for prime time.
Cursor_
#8 “When O’Reilly says “folks” and “people who don’t watch your show” he means “old white people” because those are the people that don’t watch the Daily Show and who do watch Fox News.”
The ultimate derogatory term “old white people”.
You can just see them skittering around cluttering up the life of the young and cool.
So if this is the unedited interview, what did they put on air. Was the editing fair?
Is Comedy Central going to be as fair with their editing of Bill?
Mextli said,
The ultimate derogatory term “old white people”.
You can just see them skittering around cluttering up the life of the young and cool.
It may or may not be derogatory but it is the truth:
http://variety.com/article/VR1117988273.html?categoryid=1275&cs=1
Among ad-supported cable nets, the news nets (along with older-skewing Hallmark Channel, Golf Channel and GSN’s daytime sked) sport the most gray, with Fox News Channel’s daytime and primetime skeds the absolute oldest, clocking in with a median age above 65.
http://huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/26/fox-news-audience-just-13_n_659800.html
The New York Times’ Brian Stelter tweeted that, according to Nielsen Media Research, Fox News has averaged just 29,000 black viewers in primetime so far this television season (9/09-7/10). That represents just 1.38% of its 2.102 million total viewer audience.
Wow. This O’Reilley guy is a major tool and buffoon. Stewart just kicks his ass in so many ways.
I need to be on his death panel.
lol -great act these two have going. You can see both are having a hard time to keep from cracking up over each other’s jabs. What’s funnier is that some people still think mainstream news is meant to be “real news”
that aside..
..Remember kids, in order for satire or humour to be good or “work” -it must be based in truth. All that is required for mainstream news (and politics) to “work” -is that you still believe the illusion on which it is based (and you live in), is real.
-s
They both have fun with each other and respect each other oddly. O’Reilly is now the ‘left wing’ of Fox News, which says how bat shit crazy Fox has become (re: Beck). Just like Nixon couldn’t even get IN the Republican party now (he created the EPA, thought gay marriage was ok because marriage shouldn’t be controlled by the government)…O’Reilly while conservative is a bit of a blowhard (for ratings) is at least somewhat rational and sane. Glen Beck on the other hand is seriously unstable and if one day there is a shooting at Fox where someone goes postal and it turns out to be Beck, I wouldn’t even blink. I almost expect it every day.
#15 “It may or may not be derogatory but it is the truth:”
It’s not a axiom. I’m a “old white people” and never watch FOX I can barely choke down CNN.
Speaking of which, I just watched Stephen Colbert’s appearence before a House Judiciary subcommittee. What a joke! (no pun intended). It was a sad example of how our government has degenerated.
#19–Nextlie==axiom? Has nothing to do with it. YOU and only YOU attached “derogatory” to what was otherwise a truthful and insightful comment.
Whats up with that? What is it about the truth that you find derogatory?
What you happen to watch or not watch is irrelevant to the truth, the comment made, the truth of the comment made. Thats axiomatic.
Jon Stewart vis-a-vis O’Reilly. Good long conversation even with O’s constant interruptions. Its “his” show and all about him. There is some spin in that.