Galaxy Tab Official Live Demo

By Saturday October 9, 2010

Looks like some real competition for the iPad.



32 Comments
  1. e? says:
    10/9/2010 at 6:58 pm

    #19 – people have to buy the device for there to be a market for accessories.

    How much do those kind of sites typically make, anyway?

    Reply
  2. ZZman says:
    10/10/2010 at 1:29 am

    Tried it for one hour, not ready for prime time. Maybe next year it will have more chance, and the price has to be lower for sure.

    Reply
  3. Dallas says:
    10/10/2010 at 4:37 am

    I’d pay $149 for it but the iPAD still provides a richer set of applications.

    Won’t be until end of next year when Android Tablets , aPads ™ , will catch up and then overtake iPads – rerun of the smartphone path.

    Reply
  4. Bytowner says:
    10/10/2010 at 5:13 am

    I thought I saw an opening swipe to activate and a pinch to shrink a picture, which I believe are both patented by Apple. I foresee lawsuits on it.

    Reply
  5. abrown says:
    10/10/2010 at 9:12 am

    Wrist cracking Edge 3#
    Galaxy < 1#
    WAke up folks

    Reply
  6. ECA says:
    10/10/2010 at 9:49 am

    #24
    abrown..
    Let me ask you about 3lb vs 1lb..
    If you cant support 3lb in your hands, I think you need to exercise.

    Reply
  7. Someone Else says:
    10/10/2010 at 11:15 am

    deowll, I agree. My new Kindle is fantastic.

    Reply
  8. Alki Area says:
    10/10/2010 at 8:54 pm

    It doesn’t matter if it’s hundred times better. Apple products are sold because they’re “fashion” not technology. Apple puts in cut & paste 10 years after everyone else has it and it’s hailed as a great innovation. They have front facing video, after other phones (which work on WiFi AND 3G or 4G) and no one cares. I can buy an iPad but I can’t even browse a local restaurant’s web page because it’s menu is in flash. You can argue all day long that they SHOULDN’T have done that, but instead of waiting 2-3 years for them to redesign it, I’d like to know what’s for brunch today!

    Apple…fashion, easy for gradma to use and porn safe enough for an 8 year old. Why the hell do I want that, instead of a “real” product that can view ANY web page (even sucky ones), look at all content (even porn) and has ACTUAL industry standard connectors (like HDMI, USB) and ports like MicroSD. I know SOMEDAY Apple will introduce one or more of these features and be hailed as “visionary”. People are sheep.

    Reply
  9. Alki Area says:
    10/10/2010 at 9:02 pm

    Golly…this product sure solves that silly argument over Flash vs HTML5…have BOTH! Why can’t I view Flash sites (that may or may not suck) and HTML5 sites (that may or may not suck). Why do I need to let Steve Jobs tell me that Flash is not acceptable (and Blu-Ray too if you have an Apple laptop or iMac…please tell me why THAT’s also a crap technology that Apple is reasonably avoiding just like Flash…LOL).

    Don’t let nuts like Steve Jobs tell you what you can see. I want the full internet. I want to see EXACTLY what I can view on my MacBook, Ubuntu and Windows 7 machines. My “tablet” browser shouldn’t be MORE limited that what I can see in OS X or Firefox in Ubuntu. That’s just silly.

    Reply
  10. Rob Leather says:
    10/11/2010 at 1:27 am

    I just don’t see anybody in the UK buying a MORE expensive iPad, with Samsungs name on it.

    The iPad is expensive enough as it is. So why would anybody pay more for less?

    If the device came in around $200-$300 (£100-£300) that would be something. But at the price they are suggesting, who in their right mind would get one.

    An iPad copy for MORE money, like that makes sense.

    Reply
  11. pedro says:
    10/11/2010 at 5:47 am

    #30 You’re hilarious. Tell us more how this devices is not only less but how mac is copied by everybody (and never the other way around).

    Reply
  12. W.T.Effyall says:
    10/11/2010 at 1:53 pm

    There’s a nap for that.

    Reply

« Older Comments

Leave a Response


Bad Behavior has blocked 24917 access attempts in the last 7 days.