“Don’t touch my junk!”

By Monday November 15, 2010

TSA is quoted on CNN saying Tyner is liable for up to a $10,000 fine.



46 Comments
  1. B. Dog says:
    11/15/2010 at 9:29 am

    Wow, the underwear “bomber” stunk up the whole country!

    Reply
  2. Animby - just phoning it in says:
    11/15/2010 at 9:41 am

    # 17 chuck said, ‘ “You gotta remember the underwear bomber…” … TSA let him walk right on the plane.’

    While I am in sympathy for your emotions, the TSA was not involved with the underwear bomber. He boarded his plane in Amsterdam. You are to be forgiven the error since Napoleono mentions him in defense of the pat downs.

    By the way, I can’t verify the truth, but it is being reported that dear Janet N. refused to be scanned at JFK. What a blessing for the TSA agent manning the monitors.

    BTW – what’s with the meme “naked body scanner”? It’s a grammatically poor construction. I think they should just be called what they are: pornography imagers.

    Reply
  3. hhopper says:
    11/15/2010 at 9:42 am

    We SHOULD use profiling.

    Reply
  4. Breetai says:
    11/15/2010 at 9:50 am

    I love the idiocarcy that they’re doing this crap to the crew too. I mean you gotta be shitting me, they’re flying the frakin plane. If they want to kill everyone they’ve got the steering wheel, all they have to do is dive.

    You’d think think security theater would at least pretend they’re competent. Nope

    Reply
  5. Number 25 says:
    11/15/2010 at 9:55 am

    I’m going to be flying over the holidays. What am I to do?

    Reply
  6. dcphill says:
    11/15/2010 at 10:18 am

    The terrorists have won. I’m scared to death of being irradiated or felt-up by our security folks. I don’t want to fly commercially till I can fly without all this paranoia about security. All this security stuff has made me feel insecure and I hate it. I am not a criminal and refuse to be treated as such.

    Reply
  7. usa1 says:
    11/15/2010 at 10:19 am

    It seems the TSA is working on behalf of the automobile industry to make flying as invasive and miserable as possible. Long live the road trip!

    Reply
  8. spsffan says:
    11/15/2010 at 10:29 am

    1. You have no 4th Amendment rights when boarding an airliner…you are subject to the requirements of the airline. These days, that means putting up with the TSA scan or grope, even if the airline does not run the TSA.

    2. This guy must have very small junk.

    3. You mean people who agree to travel by air, and therefore have already been butt fucked by the airlines have the nerve to object to a brief grope??? What’s wrong with people. Grin and bear (or bare) it or stay home.

    4. Actually, this whole thing is a secret plot to reduce use of petroleum and carbon emissions. The idea is to scare people away from flying so that they either stay home or use a more eco-friendly form of transport. :) .

    5. Of course, those not paranoid about their own bodies really don’t care anyway. That is, unless they have 50 pounds of explosives stuffed in their unmentionables.

    4.

    Reply
  9. ramuno says:
    11/15/2010 at 10:57 am

    Wait until someone tries sneaking stuff on-board up their butt. Then, we all will get finger probes.

    Reply
  10. pedro says:
    11/15/2010 at 11:26 am

    MC Hammer will become popular once again. Can’t touch this!

    Reply
  11. Joe says:
    11/15/2010 at 1:09 pm

    The TSA could solve this problem by hiring only attractive men and women to do the body searches. I wouldn’t mind a hot redhead fumbling around my junk.

    Reply
  12. nick the rat says:
    11/15/2010 at 1:52 pm

    wait, why is he getting hit with a 10k fine?

    Reply
  13. chuck says:
    11/15/2010 at 2:06 pm

    #28 – so we’re subject to the requirements the airline — which are following rules imposed on them by the government.

    If any airline refused the TSA rules, the FAA would simply shut them down.

    Under the same logic, since airlines aren’t bound by the constitution, they could simply execute every passenger who doesn’t want an enhanced pat-down.

    Reply
  14. Publius says:
    11/15/2010 at 3:21 pm

    http://ctc.usma.edu/harmony/profile_pdf/ali-mohammed.pdf

    Bin Laden’s bodyguard worked for the Egyptian equivalent of the TSA.

    Reply
  15. two to the head says:
    11/15/2010 at 4:01 pm

    Poor guy probably listened to the NoAgenda podcast and took Curry’s advise. We better raise some $$ to help this guy out.

    You have to have the right language when dealing with tsa pat downs. You can’t threaten them beforehand or you get this outcome. You probably need to wait until after the pat down and then ask a supervisor to file a report stating that you were touched sexually.

    Reply
  16. Mostly Harmless says:
    11/15/2010 at 4:39 pm

    looks like the underwear bomber was more successful in failure

    on no a Republican a dilemma

    Fear Government or Fear Muslims on a plane

    Reply
  17. Sister Mary Hand Grenade of Quiet Reflection says:
    11/15/2010 at 6:15 pm

    I was felt up this week, it made my nipples hard. It wasn’t at the airport though.

    Reply
  18. Animby - just phoning it in says:
    11/15/2010 at 6:48 pm

    # 37 Sister Mary said, “I was felt up this week, it made my nipples hard.”

    Was that you? The bar was so dark…

    Reply
  19. Tin Foil Underwear says:
    11/15/2010 at 8:30 pm

    For a long time there’s been this talk about “tin foil hats.”

    Now I’m thinking it’s time for tin foil underwear. That’ll keep the prying eyes of the TSA out of my pants!

    Reply
  20. Yankinwaoz says:
    11/15/2010 at 9:03 pm

    Who screens the TSA? They have access to the secure areas of the airport. What is to prevent a TSA agent from smuggling in weapons and explosives?

    Reply

« Older Comments
Newer Comments »

Leave a Response


Bad Behavior has blocked 25391 access attempts in the last 7 days.