You can see this guy design and carry out a series of experiments that employs thermite to show how it can be made to cut steel beams.
Syndicate
Subscribe to Main Blog feed here:
Subscribe to Comments too (below):
You can see this guy design and carry out a series of experiments that employs thermite to show how it can be made to cut steel beams.
Subscribe to Main Blog feed here:
Subscribe to Comments too (below):
Bad Behavior has blocked 26064 access attempts in the last 7 days.
The writings of the truthers chould be collected and published as textbook examples of Paranoid Schizophrenia.
I think of them as the “Yabbut Brigade.” No matter what flaw is pointed out in either their facts or their logic, they say, “Yeah, but…”
Reminds me of two buttons that were popular in the ’60s: “Humpty was pushed!” and “The Peanut Butter Conspiracy is spreading!”
A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject. — Winston Churchill
Those are some fascinating opinions and anecdotes #40 to bad they aren’t relevant to the subject in any way.
The writings of yours and the first 12 posters HAVE been collected and published as the inane ramblings of imbeciles armed with nought but opinion.
No the Govt did not *do* 9/11.
However it should not be a very large stretch to
speculate that they may have let it happen, and have been reaping the monetary (fake wars, that feed the Corps with seemingly endless rivers of money) and political (read Power) benefits ever since.
…I wonder how many of the people who keep crowing about “molten metal” have actually seen molten metal.
Two words can explain why the WTC towers were taken down…
Asbestos abatement.
When the new owner took the building over, he would have to remove the asbestos from the building. The cost of such abatement was much more than anything that he could reap from an insurance payout. So why not do it, and also do his patriotic duty in creating a New Pearl Harbor, for PNAC?
#44 it was the lack of asbestos that helped bring down the towers. The upper floors were built with new rules that eliminated it. New York ahead of the curve even in the 1960s.
Thank you for posting that. Too bad it won’t do anything to wake up the masses though. I’m starting to think people prefer to be asleep.
I read the molten metal was from several repositories that were in the building but forget what the metal was supposed to be. but lets say chemical analysis shows the metal was the same structural steel as used in the construction of the Towers: so what? To have said metal “pour” out of the building it would need to be in a pile/cauldron and melted–not cut thru with thermomma.
Like any good “science” we have the consensus: airplane flew into building delivering fuel and after an hour the building collapsed from its own weight. We have video. We have models showing the progress.
Alternatively we have other theories. In the main, conspiracy theories involving dozens if not hundreds of people none of whom are talking. None of them plausible. No direct evidence.
Just like anthropomorphic global warming. Same thing.
Guyver: how you coming on your response?
#31 Colt FTW Best comment on this subject ever!!!!!
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=13762
Do I really have to post this again?
http://popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842
#18 SkepticBut— said,
Here we go:
1: Asymmetric design, hit by debris, structure severely weakened by fires, no firefighting effort.
2: Experience pilots are likely to instinctively guide away from any collision. Hitting a 100-story building isn’t really any harder than landing on an airstrip, but they are psychologically hardened against intentionally taking a plane into a crash.
3: Because they were crappy cameras that barely caught anything?
# 41 nightstar said, “inane ramblings of imbeciles”
I STRONGLY resent you labeling me as an imbecile. I am a moran and proud of it!
You know, you can make a conspiracy out of almost anything. Curry figure the number 33 is some kind of code one agency uses to notify another agency that a mission is complete. With so many secret and secure ways to send a message, he envisions some cabal of idiots who influence news stories so that 33 people were killed in a bus accident in Bangladesh. You can find trends running in any number if you look hard enough. Was it Jim Carrey who did a movie about 23?
Me? I’m more sensible. I heard that Subway started tessellating their cheese slices as a signal to the beta Reticulans that it was safe to begin the next phase of the project: toasting the bread. You don’t want to know what phase three is…
In the famous words of a 911 truder, “Oh, crap, I’ve pooped myself. Agin.”
Thermite (or Thermate) can cut steel! Give the guy a Nobel prize. Wait a minute. I think electricity can cut steel. In fact I even think that steel can be completely melted in an electric arc furnace. And I even think there might have been electricity supplied in the buildings. And (like the star ship Enterprise) would a good engineer not provide a self destruct mechanism in every building. I think not! Obviously a plot by electrical workers / engineers to help the government come up with a reason to invade Iraq by blaming the people in Afghanistan. The plan was perfect!
Gotta love the idiots who claim it is impossible to steer planes into the WTC or Pentagon. Yet every day thousands of airplanes land on runways not much wider than the plane. And every day navy planes land on carrier bouncing decks.
Maybe the terrorists who planted the thermite in the WTC towers during construction were the same guys who planted those fictitious birth announcements in the Honolulu newspapers?? Man, those guys were good long-range planners!
Seriously, why did Building 7 fall down at free-fall speed? See
http://buildingwhat.org/free-fall-collapse/
And, so far, 1,457 verified architectural and engineering professionals and 11,423 other supporters have signed the petition demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation.
http://ae911truth.org/
Magnesium landing gear fire (couldn’t find the video): http://navsource.org/archives/02/cv-42/42m.htm
I’d like to hear more Bobbo on the subject.
Troofers 0, Everyone Else 1
#55: Of course, you’d think they’d have set off the charges the first time they bombed the WTC instead of using a van full of explosives.
Link 1: High school physics teacher does some math using no reference points or other good observational data, totally destroys the official report.
Seems legit…
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=seems+legit
link 2: And a greater number are in agreement with the official report, so what’s your point?
The integrity of these buildings was greatly reduced by the impacts. The design insured that.
At that time fires started pushed by full loads of jet fuels. How hot these get depends on how much O2 is driven through them and you get chimney effects in tall buildings with the heat being trapped inside. Wind wiping through the rents in the building would have pushed the temps way up.
Steel does not have a clear transition point. It does not simply change states. It gets softer until it becomes a liquid and in this case if it started to bend at the hottest points those buildings were coming down because the buildings would pancake.
I wonder if anyone has bothered to modal what the melted aluminum from the jet pouring down on the lower floors may have done by way of starting fires and opening air passages?
How many levels got soaked with flaming jet fuel? We saw smoke coming out where the impact occurred but that could not have been the only levels burning.
There are too many uncontrolled variables and unknowns for us to know with any great degree of exactness everything that went on after the collisions.
This is good. Makes a lot more sense than the gobbledegook served by the authorities. And the guy knows what he is doing. No doubt about that.
I didn’t realize this site had so many idiot sheeple reading it.
Wake up douche bags, 911 was an inside job and on top of it your country has failed. You are now owned by the Chinese.