Courtesy Airliners
|
Next: the whole plane
Rapid prototyping, or 3-D printing, has been used to create all kinds of amazing objects in a variety of media, but a team working under EADS in the UK wants to print something heretofore unheard of: the entire wing of an airliner. Working at the same facility where Concordes were once built, researchers there are already printing landing gear brackets and other aircraft components in hopes that one day they’ll be able to print out many of the critical parts for an entire aircraft.
This is chiefly due to developments that allow modern 3-D printers to turn out finished objects in media ranging from the high-grade titanium alloys necessary for aircraft construction to glass, plastics, concrete, and even frosting.
It’s also within the realm of possibility that the company could build an entire aircraft–piece by piece–in one place, sidestepping some of the supply-chain problems that have delayed the Airbus A380.
Experts in the field now say 20 percent of the output of the world’s 3-D printers is final products, and that’s expected to rise to 50 percent by 2020. In other words, people are prototyping and manufacturing on the same machines.
If you could print an airline wing that can stand up to wind-tunnel tests, you could print just about anything. 3-D printing lowers the cost of entry into manufacturing for any number of enterprises.
If EADS is already printing aircraft components, the automakers are likely to get on board. New for 2035, the printed Corvette.
But if you just print out a wing won’t it tear when it tries to fly ?
Ha… paper airplane
PC Load Letter /
When people can be printed, people will cease to exist.
energize !
*Warning Wing Jam*
Please check your wing in feeder A, and press ENTER to continue printing.
#3 I saw this technology about 5 years ago being successfuly applied in manufacturing replacement parts by reverse engineering.
Since then, the people part has been replaced by robots. They chose not to print the people.
Print a flyer ? Har.
and thats why “Plastics is the future.” And the “next” future has already made this “pieces is pieces” manufacturing obsolete: self assembling nanobots.
The future is so bright, I gotta wear shades.
Amazing, I wonder if nano tech is next.
I don’t think you understand how large scale “nanotechnology” is.
For example, there are about 1.0 x 10^25 iron atoms in 2.2 pounds of steel.
Or: 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms.
The structural design will be different to conventional aircraft. It will resemble something organic.
Here is what the future rolls right over: “You don’t understand……”
and so it goes.
Looks to me you have confused the working blocks of nanotechnology with the application of self assembling nanobots?
Alfie–what do you have to Spam-Bot about this?
Its amazing how all of this comes from simple inkjet printing technologies which HP engineers tried to put a stop two repeatedly as it was an anathema to them that they would sell a product ( inkjet cartridges ) that would be disposable and tossed out in the trash
I wonder how many humans they have attempted to print thus far..
-s
The final bet of technology that Skynet needs.
Notice the tagline to this blog is not correct?
The tagline says “Airbus Engineers To Print Out An Entire Aircraft Wing”
Whereas the actual engineers say “wants to print something heretofore unheard of”.
“To print” is not anywhere near “want to print”.
I told you to let it dry! Look, you’ve smeared the ailerons!
Poop! The aluminum cartridge is empty … again! In the old days you could get 50 or 60 wings from a single cartridge. Now you’re lucky if you get 10! Call ALCOA and see if they can refill an H-P cartridge.
So now people will go from illegal downloading to illegal printing.
The hardest thing in the world to sell to American IT is the concept of a prototype.
My old bosses always figured that it should work the first time. Bwahahahaha!!! Oh man, I slay myself. (This is the ump-teenth implementation of the <system> and you expect it to work right? Why? You were wrong every time before. Why should this time be any different?)
Now they’ve suposed to have got around the entire mess by going into production runs of such limited quantities that they should rightly be called prototypes.
Well, I guess. Google for a long time only put out betas.
Imagine the fun when you’re flying along at near Mach 1 and you tear off a wing at 35,000 feet. (You should have read LearJet’s EULA on the X-Series models, they were all betas and prototypes.)
Looks like I need to fire up my MakerBot!