Yeah – I’d do her. I think we can get bipartisan agreement on that issue.
Is the “Great Communicator” turning over in his grave because of his daughter’s most recent — and highly publicized — nude photo shoot?
Actually, maybe not. Patti Davis, long identified as the “black sheep” of former President Ronald Reagan’s children, didn’t bare all in More magazine in a spirit of defiant protest. She’s not trying to shock her conservative parents — or conservatives anywhere, for that matter.
If anything, Davis’ nude image and accompanying essay advance a thesis about the virtues of staying physically fit. She’s 58 years old now, but looks — oh — maybe 28.
I’d hit it.
Any link to the article? Looking that good, she obviously knows what she is talking about.
The guy writing hasn’t seen many 28 year old women naked recently.
Cursor_
here’s the link, gees.
http://goo.gl/pCCAL
Nah, I think this is it:
http://more.com/patti-davis-naked-body
She notices she is getting older but she takes care of herself. Normal hollywood self involvement.
She’s all yours.
If I were well off so that all I had to focus on was my body, I would look like that too.
I admire her for her stand.
I only wish I would still look that good, (though I do still have very soft skin.
Do I have to be the first to say….Photoshopped!
Just be thankfully it wasn’t Nancy. *shivers*
Will the boomers please step aside already?
You’re all the most wonderful, beautiful, amazing people who ever existed. We get it.
Your children are perfect in every way. We get it.
Now go away! You’ve done enough damage.
“I think we can get bipartisan agreement on that issue.”
Uh, no. Apart from Arnold Schwarzenneger the rest of the middle-aged Republican men are gay.
Yeah, from that angle, she look pretty good for almost being 60.
#11 I knew Dallas was Repuke.
Who is Reagan?
Good genes, money, Californian health culture, unfailing self obsession and Adobe Photoshop.
I think this is the second time. Airbrushing (Photoshop) is a wonderful thing.
At least it wasn’t the other black sheep: Ron Reagan. Whatta tool!
Cursor you hit it. Maybe a 38 year old. She ain’t got hips, either, but that’s a common trait with the beauty set nowadays – no curves.
#18
Not even 38.
I would give her 44-46 years old at best.
There is little glow and the plumpness of younger skin, even if they are thin, is not there.
That’s just how it is when the body ages.
Though I agree the lack of curves is disturbing. But I guess many men today like women that are shaped like 15 year old boys.
But hey if that turns you on and you are both of consenting age, go for it. Me I will stick with actual women.
Cursor_
The truth is, some people are LUCKY they were born with exceptional genes. Most women will never look like that at 58, no matter how hard they try.