Fire crews and police could only watch after a man waded into San Francisco Bay, stood up to his neck and waited. They wanted to do something, but a policy strictly forbade them from trying to save the 50-year-old, officials said.

This was done to send the taxpayers a message. Most of the “public servants” in San Francisco make well over $100,000 and do not like cuts to their programs. It’s just that simple. This story will be much discussed over the next few days.




  1. So what says:

    Wow for the most part reasoned coherent responses. What is happening to this blog.

  2. Buzz Mega says:

    “Interim Alameda Fire Chief Mike D’Orazi said that due to 2009 budget cuts his crews did not have the training or cold-water gear to go into the water.”

  3. mharry860 says:

    So did the witness who pulled his body from the water have the proper training and equipment?

  4. Yankinwaoz says:

    WTF? This has nothing to do with San Francisco. This is Alameda, opposite side of the bay. This is the same as blaming the NYC police for a guy drowning in New Jersey.

  5. Steve says:

    Shame on the cops for standing by and not trying to rescue the guy to “make a point” about lack of training. I’m sure they’re able to improvise outside their guidelines when their own interest is involved. Depressed people often act in a way they hope will get the necessary action in response to their cry for help. Many people have been brought back from the edge and managed to turn their lives around.

  6. Publius says:

    layoffs

    jailtime

    or it will happen again

  7. wtfdouchebag says:

    So when is Dvorak the douchebag going to fix his glaring error and apologize to the SF fire department and police? Alameda is across the frickin bay! Oh I forgot. He is not about facts….he is about being a hit whore. F*ck your site. I’ll let my self out. Thanks.

  8. McCullough says:

    Bobbo – really, quit trolling.

    But again, maybe you are that self-centered….Are you sure you’re not a PUKE?

  9. deowll says:

    It would appear that a great many posters are only concerned about looking out for themselves.

  10. B. Simpson says:

    Anyone who thinks that government workers are concerned about your welfare in any way shape or manner should not be surprised at this in any way
    Its all about their so much an hour , benefits and pensions
    and teaching you who is boss
    The poor guy who committed suicide probably did so as a result indirectly or directly or all their costs to society
    What a bunch of cold harded bas tard s Obama is little better

  11. bobbo, the pragmatic Libertarian says:

    #48–McCullough==thinking for ones self, as opposed to what a majority of others may think, or even what the law may imply, may be thought of as “self centered” as you may but that is all directly contrary to “thinking” (sic!) as a PUKE. Now there we need a distinction. PUKEs, actual Pukes, the ones who do personally benefit by lining their own nests certainly are thinking for themselves. Greedy, self interested, and willing to lie but thinking for and about themselves: about 2-5% of the population depending on definition. Then there is the PUKE by voting where people who are INJURED by voting away their benefits do it because they buy into the LIES told by PUKES.

    Example: have the purchasing power of your dollar decreased so that PUKES can have a lower tax on their capital gains or escape having any estate tax at all. Its like starving peasants voting to add on another wing to the Landed Aristocrats Castle.

    Yes, just like that. I do think for and about myself. I invite everyone else to do the same. Thats not puking into a bag, thats opening up one end so the weak minded can find a way to fight themselves out to the fresh air of FREEEEEEEEDOM.

  12. So what says:

    #50 Wow, generalize much? I’m sure you would have hopped right in, you know, being such a big damn hero.

  13. Bye bye says:

    Here’s a gun. Go kill yourself.

  14. Holdfast says:

    #49 get a grip!

    If they are safely able to do something, they will do it.Even first aiders are taught to keep themselves safe – then get on with it.

    How many police officers do you think should die every year? Should they die in futile attempts to rescue people from situations like this, or would you rather they endangered themselves unnecessarily when fighting crime?

    Instead of that, “Let’s remember, be careful out there…”

  15. J Rapoza says:

    Where are our heros?

  16. So what says:

    #55 I prefer a live person to a dead hero.

  17. toureasy says:

    Everybody dies.

  18. Barry&Michelles Suasage Gravy Enema Adventure says:

    Maybe he was a member of VHEMT leading by example as well as taking it to the next level.

  19. Nelson says:

    I commend them for respecting his wishes. I hope that when I decide to go, I wont have to fight off a bunch of do-gooders.

  20. Mr Fog says:

    “Doris? Did you oversalt the Soylent Green, today?”



Bad Behavior has blocked 25404 access attempts in the last 7 days.