Finally, someone tells us the real reason why voting machines are not audited. It’s about time someone testified about this. That said, this guy has a few dubious answers.




  1. MikeN says:

    #35 it’s more like 120 million, and for many precincts thats less than 1000 votes, so yes.
    You could also have a machine count paper ballots.
    You know, basic stuff before liberals decided we needed electronic voting, to predictable results. Predictable for all but liberals so upset over Florida.

  2. tcc3 says:

    #41 MikeN

    But that would be an evil liberal *machine*! As I recall that paper ballot counting has its flaws too.

  3. MikeN says:

    Well, yes of course it has flaws. The liberal flaw is thinking that the new idea will solve things. The end result was predictable, and predicted.

  4. tcc3 says:

    And the conservative flaw is that “the old ways” are *always* better.

    If a solution fails, think of a better one. “This solution wasn’t perfect so we were wrong to even try” is fatalistic and stupid on its face.

  5. Mr. Fusion says:

    #41, Lyin’ Mike,

    Electronic voting machines were a Republican idea, pushed by the Bush machine in the wake of 9/11 hysteria.

  6. MikeN says:

    hahahaha, you’re a hoot. I suppose interet votig is a Republican idea too?

  7. tcc3 says:

    #45 Mr. Fusion

    Now that Bush’s failed policies have been exposed and is widely viewed disfavorably, they’ve decided he was a progressive all along. Even though they cheered him on when he was in office.

    Gotta keep up with the self delusion of the month.

  8. Glenn E. says:

    Rigged voting machines simply covers up for the fact that whoever does get elected, they do whatever the most moneyed interests, tell them to do. Party affiliation doesn’t matter.



Bad Behavior has blocked 25903 access attempts in the last 7 days.