Well, Hell. Is This Really A Surprise?

By Sunday December 4, 2011



81 Comments
  1. Somebody says:
    12/6/2011 at 9:35 am

    I’m disappointed.

    I thought for sure the beltway crowd were all going.

    I guess it is up to us to bring justice to them?

    Reply
  2. JimD says:
    12/6/2011 at 10:23 am

    So is “Heaven” !!! It’s all MADE UP, from “In the Begininng … ” all the way to the end !!!

    Reply
  3. FRAGaLOT says:
    12/6/2011 at 2:40 pm

    like Duh?
    “Hell” was made up to fear people to behave, and “Heaven” was made up to encourage good behavior. but you’d think these religious leaders who apparently truly believe this would stop raping little boys.

    The concept of hell and “the Devil” wasn’t created until after Christians were pilfering and forcing druids and wiccans to convert. By clamming these old earth religions were “satan worshipers.”

    Reply
  4. Traaxx says:
    12/7/2011 at 5:19 pm

    Uncle Davie Stalin is up to his campaign for the political clowns of the Globalist Bankers, leading us into the new Dard Ages with the glib piece of junk.

    This is a fraud, he probably advertises himself as a Christian taking money from Christians when he’s just a Humanist in Sherpard clothing. You can read more about this “LIBERAL Demoncrat” at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Shelby_Spong.

    It’s sad someone would try and mislead the flock, but then Jesus said they would wish they have a milstone around their and were cast into the sea than fasc the pusnishment he will receive. If you dont’ believe in Hell or a place where His Father, God the Father, has many rooms then you don’t accept the bible as the word of God. If you sit there and decide which parts of the Bible mean what it says and which parts are false then you make yourself God and are a humanist, just like the Communist/NAZIs and every other Totalitarian ruler to stride the earth.

    Read the Bible, the inspired word of God, not of man.

    Seek salvation throught my Lord Christ Jesus of the God the Father and the help of the Holy Spirit, don’t listen to someone that’s taken money from people under false pretenses his entire life and now seeks to make political point upon you soul and eternal life.

    Whatever……………………………………………………………………………
    Traaxx

    Reply
  5. thatsmychin says:
    12/8/2011 at 3:13 am

    Does anyone here actually read the Bible, or did anyone bother to check it out before posting all of this blather? Luke 16:19-39 clearly talks about a man in hell, tormented by flames, asking Lazarus to dip his finger in water to cool his tongue.

    Some argue that this is not a parable like the rest because in every other parable Jesus does not use names. He uses descriptions like ‘a farmer’ ‘a poor man’ ‘the manager’. Here in Luke Jesus uses a name….Lazarus. In verse 31 Jesus actually says, “They will no be convinced even if someone rises from the dead”. While some will argue that this Lazarus and the Lazarus raised from the dead are two different people, it’s still something to consider.

    Even so, Jesus referenced “hell” and torment of the unbeliever. I can’t believe out of 75 posts no one even bothered to crack a Bible open.

    Reply
    • Gary, the dangerous infidel says:
      12/8/2011 at 9:19 am

      Before you get too carried away with your direct quotations by Luke of Jesus’ own words, keep one thing in mind… Luke never even met Jesus. He was simply retelling stories that he had heard and read, with less fact-checking than Fox News. Luke’s stories were ultimately chosen by the Church council to be included in the compilation of writings you know as “The Holy Bible” to support their teachings.

      Without Luke, how else would we have such a wonderful quotation of what the angels said to the shepherds who were in the fields near Bethlehem on the night that Jesus was born? Our Christmas carols might be considerably less colorful without the story of the angels, but quoting Luke is the equivalent of quoting unnamed sources, because that’s where he got his stories.

      Reply
      • thatsmychin says:
        12/8/2011 at 4:39 pm

        Before you get too carried away with your Red Herring, keep in mind the premise of Uncle Dave’s post. I understand that catching the church in a ‘gotcha moment’ makes a lot of people feel better about the decisions they’ve made. In this instance, the statement that the church invented hell as a control tactic is simply false. It’s like saying the church invented communion, or Paul the apostle.

        Your premise that the authorship of the Bible is questionable would make for a good debate, but it’s not relevant here.

        Reply
        • Gary, the dangerous infidel says:
          12/8/2011 at 6:46 pm

          I disagree concerning the relevance. You suggested we crack the Bible to see what Luke quoted Jesus as saying, and my reply was that Luke never even met Jesus (writing his gospel well after Jesus died) so the quotation in the book of Luke about Lazarus and Hell is meaningless for your purpose of establishing what Jesus really said.

          You seem to separate the Church from the authorship of the Bible, specifically the New Testament, in making the point that references to Hell in the Bible prove that the Church didn’t invent it. However, the authors of those scriptures, including Luke and Paul, were a part of the early Christian community and Church, and just because it had less organization then than it has now doesn’t mean it wasn’t still the Church.

          Your argument only holds up among believers that the Bible is divinely inspired throughout, not instead written by members of the Church community and compiled in a process that was at times contentious. For many of the rest of us, the only issue up for debate isn’t whether, but WHY they included this notion of a place called “Hell.” The priest in the video posits that it was a deterent to assert greater control, which seems plausible for an organization that seems to crave control.

          Hell seems to me to be a sort of middle ground — worse than the lump of coal from Santa, but not nearly as horrific as the agony of being stoned to death by the early Jews.

          This wasn’t a red herring. If you’ve quoted the Bible as evidence, authorship is not at all irrelevant.

          Reply
          • thatsmychin says:
            12/11/2011 at 3:50 am

            Jack: I haven’t seen the cat all day!

            Jill: It’s in the box over there.

            Jack: Well I think Schrodinger would have a few thoughts on that….

            Dude, we’re not trying to split the atom here. Sometimes it’s just a cat in a box. If you want to go down the rabbit hole…..what “church” is Spong referring to? Is it the early church or the church from the 5th to the 16th century? Maybe it’s the Protestant church (which he is a part of), or maybe it’s the post reformation Catholic church; you don’t know and neither do I. The argument that ‘the church’ is the early chuch simply because you want it to be does not work. If we are speaking Gary language then ‘The Church’ invented Jesus, miracles, and the antichrist; the revelation that hell was invented by the church wouldn’t be that big of a deal, would it?

            Instead we have a Bishop speaking bishop language. Using the term ‘invented’ to implying ‘of whole cloth’, ‘not Biblical’, ‘made up’. Inventions of the church fall under indulgences, the deity of Mary, stuff like that. In reality there are tons of Biblical references to hell, and just because they don’t quote Dante verbatim does not mean they aren’t there.

            Let’s tackle the control tactic thing. The early church (30-100AD) was trying to get a foot hold, not control. Ask any dictator or authoritarian how it works; you are sugar and spice and everything nice until you have majority, THEN you assert control.

            Or I could just remind readers that everything Spong had to say was not just ambiguous, but in direct contradiction to literal passages from the Bible…..the guy has created his own theology and simply borrowed some buzz words from the Bible. The only reason this video made the rounds (2 years ago!) was because atheists get all excited when a guy with a white collar starts speaking their language.

            So Gary, back to rabbit holes. If you don’t like Luke then let’s go with Matthew, or Mark, or Thessalonians, or, or, or….. I didn’t list every Biblical reference because I didn’t want to Bible thump the audience; I figured the closest thing to a Hollywood hell-scape would suffice.

            Do you see what happens when you stray from the premise? We now have about 30 different holes we could go down.

          • Gary, the dangerous infidel says:
            12/11/2011 at 9:31 am

            I apologize for alleging that the Bible is a product of the church.


« Older Comments

Leave a Response


Bad Behavior has blocked 25403 access attempts in the last 7 days.