reader says:

My complaint about Motorola

Why doesn’t Motorola try doing something constructive for once in its history? Why is it that 99 times out of 100, Motorola behaves like an eternal student at a vast, fastidious campus where everyone is taught that Motorola has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring itself to help disseminate the True Faith of incendiarism? And is it possible for those who defend inhumane, closed-minded neopaganism to make their defense look more delirious than it currently is? This letter is not the place to explore the answers to those questions. Its purpose is instead to give you some background information about Motorola. Wait! Before you dismiss me as crass, hear me out.

Considering the corruption and foolishness that characterize ill-tempered bludgers, this makes me fearful that I might someday find myself in the crosshairs of Motorola’s crazy précis. (To be honest, though, it wouldn’t be the first time.) I’m not afraid of Motorola. However, I am concerned that it sees the world as somewhat anarchic, a game of catch-as-catch-can in which the sneakiest peculators nab the biggest prizes. I deeply believe that it’s within our grasp to throw off Motorola’s yoke of frotteurism. Be grateful for this first and last tidbit of comforting news. The rest of this letter will center around the way that too many petulant menaces out there are looking for the quick and easy fix, for a great savior who will make it all right again so they can go back to sleep. They gather at the foot of the mount to herald the coming of Motorola and neglect to notice that Motorola uses the word “pathologicopsychological” without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. Organizations that are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated.

Although Motorola markets itself as a high-concept, change-the-world do-gooder, when it comes to its double standards, I warrant that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It’s time to reveal the constant tension between centripetal and centrifugal forces of dialogized heteroglossia resulting from Motorola’s conjectures. The sooner we do that the better because it has remarked that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. This is a comment that should chill the spine of anyone with moral convictions. To make sure you understand I’ll spell it out for you. For starters, Motorola doesn’t want to acknowledge that failure to analyze the myopic—and what one can term only irritating—underpinnings of its ethics will steal the fruits of other people’s labor. In fact, Motorola would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that’s because it’s good at one thing, and that’s keeping its ulterior motives secret. Only a few initiates in the inner sanctum of Motorola’s army of violent radicals know that it’s planning to devalue me as a person. Even fewer of these initiates know that Motorola once said that loathsome schmegeggies of one sort or another have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. Its grunts and others capable of little more than rote psittacism are now saying that too. In contrast, I say that Motorola claims that the world is crying out to labor beneath its firm but benevolent heel. Well, I beg to differ. I would like to close by saying that Motorola uses its victim status as a kind of magic incantation to stifle debate, disparage critical analysis, and persuade us that it’s merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live.
http://www.pakin.org/complaint?firstname=Motorola&pgraphs=3&gender=c