Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC — I thought the early discussions shortly after the WTC collapse were credible and kind of still think so. BUT none of it explained the collapse of WTC7 which was not hit by a plane. Why did it fall exactly as if it had been rigged for demolition? This topic should be hot for a while.

The physics of 9/11 — including how fast and symmetrically one of the World Trade Center buildings fell — prove that official explanations of the collapses are wrong, says a Brigham Young University physics professor.

In fact, it’s likely that there were “pre-positioned explosives” in all three buildings at ground zero, says Steven E. Jones.

In a paper posted online Tuesday and accepted for peer-reviewed publication next year, Jones adds his voice to those of previous skeptics, including the authors of the Web site www.wtc7.net” whose research Jones quotes. Jones’ article can be found at www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html.

“It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three (WTC) buildings,” BYU physics professor Steven E. Jones says.

Jones, who conducts research in fusion and solar energy at BYU, is calling for an independent, international scientific investigation “guided not by politicized notions and constraints but rather by observations and calculations.

found by Mad Dog Mike

related links:
Conspiracy thoughts



  1. AB CD says:

    >He conveniently retired his position on Sept. 11, 2001.

    Wow, someone who takes responsibility. If only Norman Mineta had done this. And George Tenet.

  2. Manuel J. Chavez says:

    The more you read about Flight 77 and the ensuing coverup, the easier it is to believe the WTC buildings had help coming down. Bush needed a new Pearl Harbor and he got one. Roosevelt knew, Bush knew. The US government so far has made every dictator in history look like Boy Scouts. The religious sheep continue to kill on both sides in the name of something that has never existed. Jesus is a lie, the most damaging and life changing lie ever told Countless people have suffered tortures beyond nightmare proportion in the name of religious insanity. That same insanity afflicts America right now. No less insane, no less fervent in their ideaology are modern christians and muslims. As an Atheist, I sit in horror and watch humans kill while pretending to represent a superdeity that hides in deep space. Bush is religiously insane, so are the people who voted for him. There is, never has been, and never will be a god. It is in this things fictitious name that Man kills and kills again, in complete contrast to religious creeds. By the way, the Moon landings are pure BS. They destroyed the blueprints to the Lunar Lander, I need go no further.

  3. Unbelievable says:

    I have mixed feelings about all this. I don’t think anybody, other than possibly “terrorists” (who knows who they worked for) would have planted explosives in those buildings. However, when the 1993 bombing failed, they said, “We’ll be back.” Bubba Clinton didn’t believe them, so here we are.

    I remember Bubba Bush’s explanation as something like, ‘This is somebody that tried to kill ma’daddy.” He actually blamed “(pick a raghead, don’t matter)” for wanting to kill George Bush the First. When I heard that on the news, I remember thinking, “Oh shit, here we go…”

    So, here we are.

  4. psikeyhackr says:

    It has been SEVEN YEARS since the destruction of the World Trade Center and SEVENTY SEVEN years since the completion of the Empire State Building. The ESB was designed and constructed without computers. They did not exist.

    But in SEVEN YEARS we don’t have a table telling us the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE on every level of the WTC. Every level of every skyscraper must support the combined weights of all of the levels above it. The ESB was designed from the top down but skyscrapers must be built from the bottom up. So they must know how much steel and concrete is going where on every tall building before the hole for the foundation is dug. So why don’t we have it?

    In the 10,000 page report by the NIST there are only two places where they mention that the distribution of weight or mass must be known to analyze the problem. But they don’t even specify the total amount of concrete in the towers.

    psik


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5274 access attempts in the last 7 days.