Class Action Lawsuit Against School Book Publishers For Overcharging

Hardcopy textbooks exist for the same reason that other hardcopy books exist: access to them doesn’t depend on a computer. The reason “EBooks” haven’t taken off is that you can’t read them unless you have the specific reader for that book, you can’t stick a piece of paper in them as a bookmark, you usually can’t copy a few pages as a quick reference, you can’t make rude comments in the margins, etc.

Getting back to the original point of the article, textbooks are very expensive because they’re printed in limited runs, which drives up the cost of each book. Even though I understand this, it still hurts to pay $100 or more for a college textbook.

I think “Limited Run” is the key…. Back before the invention of fire, when I was in college, a used book was good for at least the year it was originally spec’d, if not the next. My daughter (in college now – a bit easier since fire was invented) is telling me that some books she’s bought are obsolete at the end of the current grading period. IOW, a combination of new material and deliberate obfuscation (re-pagination sort of thing) makes her books unsellable at anything close to what she paid for them.

I also had a professor who’d written his own book, and got it locked into the course. “Production values” were atrocious, and it was $60 (in 1963!). It wasn’t otherwise all that bad though. I’m sure that’s still going on.

(In elementary school the kid had a book that was state-mandated for “Ohio History”, printed on kraft paper, and full of errors. Soy ink, too, I think, which would have been OK but the contrast issues were a nuisance for these old eyes helping her out.)

It’s all profit….

It may be irrelevant, but it also seems that these one-time-use books are also very expensively produced. I’m not sure that’s all that good an idea either….

Regards,

Stu.

I’ve been involved in this business as a college professor and, peripherally, as a colleague of people involved in writing textbooks. There are a few issues here.

Part of this you can blame on Ronald Reagan, but not all. Reagan’s big tax cut bill (which, incidentally, raised my taxes on my graduate student stipend by $900/year) involved a few other things as well, one of which was a radical change in the way taxes were assessed on book publishers. Previously, they paid tax on sales only. Reagan changed that to a tax on inventory. This forced publishers to change their business model. On subjects like calculus and intro physics that don’t change very rapidly, they would make massive print runs, stick them in a warehouse, and dole them out over many years. For example, the intro physics book I used in 1977 was Halliday and Resnick, which had just been published in the second edition. The first edition was published in 1966. I paid about $20 for the book, and about $100 total for all my books that semester. Immediately after the tax law change, the price shot up to about $75.

It was at this point, I think, that publishers had a epiphany: short print runs and rapid edition turnover dramatically reduces the used book market since what they are selling is out of date — same size market but an instant increase in share. Today, the typical revision cycle is 3 years and, in rapidly moving fields like astronomy, 2 year. I think that is a bare minimum. You can’t write a book any faster unless it is the only thing you do. Electronic distribution won’t change that.

Electronic distribution also does not afford the right usage patterns. The way a scientist reads a book or paper is to sit down with pencil in hand and fill in the gaps, derive equations, extrapolate ideas into possible other research avenues, and so on. My books are filled with marginal notes. That is worse than inconvenient on a book reader, it is often altogether impossible. The files are locked down by rights management and even if they weren’t, it is a pain in the ass to write equations on a computer.

I frequently read electronic versions of journals now and I’m amazed that I ever got along without them. Indeed, arXiv is now the primary means of communication among working physicists. This is not, however, due to any inherent advantage of the electronic format. It is purely a matter of convenience: communication is faster, and you don’t have to walk to the library. My usage pattern, however, is still paper based — I print the articles so that I can annotate them. I have multiple books and articles open on my desk simultaneously so I can cross reference. All of them have marginal scribbles. Try doing that with an ebook of any stripe.

Like it or not, paper books are going to be with us for a while longer. Ebooks should be thought of as a different medium altogether, not the same medium dressed up in a new suit. The actions that the reader can take are different. There is one market, however, where I think ebooks offer a real advantage — K-12. With schoolbooks, you get in trouble for doing the things I do to my books. And it can’t be good for a child’s back to be hauling a bookbag that weighs as much as the child. They look like humpback whales going down the hallway.

This probably won’t happen with any rapidity for one good reason — the marketing gurus at publishing houses. They see an opportunity to exploit DRM to lock in buyers to using their full product line only. Imagine a book reader that only reads Glencoe books and you’ll get the picture. Great for the balance sheet, terrible for the school district.

And its about damn time – I figure I must have spent over $1500 in college textbooks in the last 10 yrs (having switched schools and majors a few times) – You cant experience the true feeling of being ripped off untill you purchase college text books, use them, return them in excelent condition, and are able to sell them for perhaps 10% of the original sales price.

How can i get in on this class action lawsuit?

I would argue that since the students have already paid their tuition, which is supposed to be what covers the cost of the education, the schools should be selling the books at cost, and not using them to extract even more money from the students. But, as much as I agree that the campus bookstores are a racket, students should probably be lucky that they are offered the chance to sell their books back at all.

I took Calculus I from the University of Washington Extension service (a bad experience overall), and Stewart, the text, cost $170 new. There were 4 (!) versions of this text by the same author. The course used the first 1/4 of the book, and a significant portion of the text was devoted to promoting the author’s other products (answer books, software, study guides). Compared to my Calculus text of 30 years ago, this text was a waste of resources.

Rant: Some Universities teach mathematics and others use mathematics as a screening process to prevent students from pursuing engineering or other hard sciences. “Mr. Einstein, you may be interested in physics, but your grades in Calculus II were below what we expect, so we have decided to give your spot to a guy with good grades but no aptitude for physics whatsoever. Good luck at the Patent Office.” The University of Washington is firmly in the latter category and really needs to reevaluate the way that it teaches undergraduate mathematics.

Someone needs to tell the people at Lulu.com that their on-demand short run printing model will not work. I know they are making money now, but the established printers say it can’t be done, so I guess we have to believe them. After all, I would not want to put all the typesetters and press operators out of business if they were to automate and modernize their…..wait a moment. I just applied for a computer tech support job at Follett. Their entire press is automated and costs virtually nothing compaired to 20 years ago to print. Maybe they are just price gouging since they have no competition?

Sorry about the math… It’s late and I’m tired

Approx. wholesale cost to print 5000, 672 page 7.5″ x 10″ hardcover chemistry books, full colour on dull coated paper:

Composition: $100,000
Printing of 21, 32 pg signatures: $120,000
Paper: $17,000
Bindery: $65,000

Sub TL: $302,000
40% markup (profit, management, distribution)

Net price before tax and retail profit: $85 each
Double the order to 10,000 books: Net price $59 each
50,000 books: $39 each

Doesn’t include fee and royalties for the author.

G’night

What I don’t like is these book stores will sell a new book for $100 and even if you take good care of it, they only buy it back at the end of the semester for maybe $40 or $50 and then they’ll turn around and sell it used for $90. It really rips of the student and/or their parents and I hope the book store gets raked over the coals. Publishers don’t set the buyback prices. It’s the book stores themselves.

Text book rental system. Some schools in I think Minnesota? (there is a state that does this, maybe not them) participate in this program. But do you really want to pay into a program like this if your say an art student, who spends a majority on art supplies not books.

I hate buying a textbook only to have the class that the teacher says you “NEED” the book, but he/she regurgitates the book into your notes and tests are only on the notes. Such a waste of money it pisses me off.