Quite a few readers are interested in this model. Find more pictures of her here.

CNN Money – November 28 2006, via the always interesting Overlawyered.com:

A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. Treasury Department is violating the law by failing to design and issue currency that is readily distinguishable to blind and visually impaired people.

Judge James Robertson, in a ruling on a suit by the American Council of the Blind, ordered the Treasury to devise a method to tell bills apart.

The judge wrote that the current configuration of paper money violates the Rehabilitation Act’s guarantee of “meaningful access.”

“It can no longer be successfully argued that a blind person has ‘meaningful access’ to currency if she cannot accurately identify paper money without assistance,” Robertson wrote in his ruling.

American Council for the Blind v. Sec’y of the Treasury, United States District Court of Columbia (2006):

Unable to identify the value of paper money without help from others, blind and low vision individuals are always at risk of being cheated. The frequency of such acts against blind and low vision individuals is impossible to measure, because victims may not know that they have been deceived unless someone tells them. Ms. Brunson, Dr. Stephens, and Mr. Sheehan could recall only a few instances when they learned that they had been defrauded.2 It is reasonable to assume, however, that deliberate fraud or accidental shortchanging may go unnoticed for some time, and that some instances may never be noticed.

For example, Ms. Brunson recalled one occasion in which a store clerk informed her she was being given a $20 bill. She later learned, when attempting to make another purchase, that this bill was actually worth only $5.



  1. Charles Ellis says:

    Comment #2, while being incorrect about ATM and credit machines not having braille, makes a good point that those same machines don’t provide any accessible way for blind people to be assured they were charged the correct amount.

    The cashier (as far as I’ve ever seen) is the one who enters the amount to be charged when using debit/credit, and this is only ever shown on an LCD display panel, and printed on a paper receipt that doesn’t include braille.

    I guess the reason they haven’t tried to remedy this (beyond that it would definitely be a large burden, changing out all of those machines), is that with credit or debit, if someone was charged the wrong amount, at some later date it could be discovered and the person responsible could be identified.

  2. SN says:

    #20 “I don’t trust people that are nice.”

    Or who listens to Loverboy!

  3. OmarTheAlien says:

    In order to prove my niceness I would be ecstatically happy to help the lady in the picture interpret the bills, holding her hand in mine while together we trace the outline of whatever dead president graces her bills.

  4. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    #19 – The only reason why cash is accepted and used is because we have a government that is trusted.

    By whom?

  5. Arbo Cide says:

    The logic of that court ruling is pretty ridiculous. It’s almost entirely a wish list of what the activist group wants, and talking about how countries are doing things like that. Well then go to Congress and get them to pass it. Maybe I should sue John Dvorak for not making his site more accessible



Bad Behavior has blocked 25277 access attempts in the last 7 days.