Chicago Tribune – December 4, 2007:

Bloggers and free speech advocates are calling on prosecutors not to file charges against a teacher arrested for allegedly posting an anonymous comment online praising the Columbine shooters.

Some were disturbed by the post police say James Buss left on a conservative blog, but other observers said it was a sarcastic attempt to discredit critics of education spending.

Buss, a former president of the teacher’s union, allegedly wrote that teacher salaries made him sick because they are lazy and work only five hours a day. He praised the teen gunmen who killed 12 students and a teacher before committing suicide in the April 1999 attack at Columbine High School.

“They knew how to deal with the overpaid teacher union thugs. One shot at a time!” he wrote, adding they should be remembered as heroes.

“If you look at all the factors in this case, it’s pretty clear it would be a mistake to charge,” said Larry Dupuis, legal director of The American Civil Liberties Union of Wisconsin.

Heck, even if it was not sarcasm, which it clearly was, since when it illegal to praise a murderer?



  1. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    Prosecutor salaries make me sick. All they do is railroad citizens into prison and take payoffs from big corporations.

    I for one hope that more teenagers buy automatic weapons and go into courtrooms to murder lawyers and judges.

    That’s what a hero would do.

  2. moss says:

    Cripes. We re-elect murderers.

  3. SN says:

    1. “I for one hope that more teenagers buy automatic weapons and go into courtrooms to murder lawyers and judges.”

    After they disembowel them first!

  4. DavidtheDuke says:

    damn OHFODALUV, I hope your door is steel reinforced. Hell, make it titanium

  5. hhopper says:

    Damn! I guess now it’s illegal to have poor taste.

  6. Gasbag says:

    Just because you’re an Asshole and talk shit does not mean you should go to jail.

  7. grog says:

    dude if it were illegal to glorify murderers then there are a lot of sopranos fans going to jail!

    hell, throw everyone into jail! best way to keep everyone in line!

  8. DBR says:

    This man, James Buss, has learned an
    important lesson: sarcasm, like
    law enforcement, invasive surgery,
    interior decorating, haute cuisine,
    etc., is best left to professionals.

  9. Phillep says:

    Yeah, I’ve been following this over at Boots and Saddles.

    Buss pulled a Moby and someone took him serious. Most of the conservatives that hang out there spotted that he was a fake, but someone, no one has fessed up yet, threw a hissy fit and went to the cops. The B&S moderators gave the cops the IP address when they asked for it, then the cops went to the ISP to find out who it was.

    Considering how many fake “hate speach” incidents have been uncovered lately, some suspect that Buss is the one who went to the cops. Others suspect that some other teacher did, but why would any of the small group of teachers be reading B&S?

    The only tears I’m shedding are of laughter. How many of you would be defending the poster if he had actually been a conservative?

  10. RBG says:

    He seems to be the sort of non-threatening, well-balanced person I’d like to see associated with the teaching of children and loose on our society. (That’s more sarcasm.)

    Don’t worry, throwing he guy in jail is just a bit of police sarcasm.

    RBG

  11. hhopper says:

    Some people just don’t get sarcasm.

  12. Angel H. Wong says:

    #6

    “Just because you’re an Asshole and talk shit does not mean you should go to jail.”

    I agree, otherwise Howard Stern would be rotting in jail a long time ago.

    #11

    They’re called Christians.

  13. Phillep says:

    Angel, the cops did not act on their own. Any wagers about who made the complaint? You want to bet it was some bible thumper that blew the whistle?

  14. Mr. Fusion says:

    The guy should file a civil suit in Federal Court against the blog site, police and town. He shouldn’t even wait to see if the Prosecutor charges him. I read nothing where he advocated violence against anyone or identified anyone for retribution. Without a threat that would mean his free speech rights were suppressed causing him injury.

  15. bobbo says:

    Isn’t the important point here that the comment was posted anonymously and yet “someone” went before a judge to get a subpoena to find out who this person was?

    It doesn’t sound like a DA did this or the guy would be charged already. And it doesn’t sound like a school system as he wasn’t fired or put on leave.

    So, it sounds like some cop being paid overtime to surf the web looking for inappropriate free speech.

    I wonder what the unsolved murder rate in the jurisdiction is?

  16. bobbo says:

    PS to my post at #15–I meant to emphasize that the subpoena got past the issuing judge. ie–system safeguards to police excess are not working. But the cops acting zealously is still a good issue. Seems like the DA’s might actually be showing some good judgment in not charging–expect that as the headline tomorrow after todays mall massacre.

  17. RBG says:

    I guess you just had to be there to appreciate the humor.

    I mean on the Columbine floor with your brains across the window while your dad is trying to break through a police line.

    RBG

  18. Phillep says:

    Bobbo, no legal paper. The information was freely given by the people who the police asked. That was discussed over in B&S as well. I’m not sure of the protocol on initiating a case; could be an anon source called the cops and the cops brought up the blog. I don’t recall if the school board got involved, but it would be a laugh if they did.

    I hope the person who made the complaint is exposed, and my money is on a school employee.

    Kids have been expelled from school for less, but the kids don’t have a union to write a contract and they have zero political power.

  19. Li says:

    Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz are great people, and I admire what they have done.

    How long before I get a shiny pair of handcuffs?

  20. GigG says:

    Why are you guys bitching about the prosicuter? The second paragraph of TFA reads,

    “Washington County District Attorney Todd Martens said the comment left by James Buss was offensive and disgusting, but was protected speech under the state and U.S. constitutions.”

    and the headline reads, “No Charges Over Online Columbine Comment”

  21. Phillep says:

    Li, you have joined Angel in posting about your sexual proclitivities?

  22. KevinL says:

    Deja Vu. Didn’t I just post yesterday that the teacher’s union was the cause of all our education problems? This guy shouldn’t be in jail because of what he said, he should be in jail because he is a lazy teacher and was the head of that criminal organization. Okay, so it’s sort of sarcasm but not really.

  23. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    #9 The only tears I’m shedding are of laughter. How many of you would be defending the poster if he had actually been a conservative?

    All of us who are liberals would be. Liberals believe in civil liberties.

  24. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    #22 – Didn’t I just post yesterday that the teacher’s union was the cause of all our education problems?

    I don’t know if you did, but if you did you would be demonstrating a remarkable ignorance about teachers, schools, unions, and our myriad of complex problems that face educational systems.

  25. RBG says:

    23 OFTLO Except when you don’t, as in the case of fundamental Christians.

    RBG

  26. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    #25 – I can’t speak for everyone, but not matter how idiotic the rhetoric of of some far right wingnut Xian is, I would never advocate they be silenced. On the other hand, I absolutely advocate they be engaged directly if they are trying to move public policy.

    If marginalization is the result, then their idea simply didn’t stand the scrutiny in the marketplace of ideas… but their voice isn’t silenced.

  27. RBG says:

    Well I have to give you credit. I would have thought liberals would surely feel the need to supress any and all healthy scrutiny, debate and writings of religious issues in schools. But it is clear to me now that you really do hold dear the hallowed principles of freedom of speech far above petty dogma and politics.

    RBG

  28. Mister Catshit says:

    #27, Mister RBG,

    I would have thought liberals would surely feel the need to supress [sic] any and all healthy scrutiny, debate and writings of religious issues in schools.

    There is a big difference between the discussion of ideas among adults and the teaching of religious doctrine to children under the guise of science or as part of their curriculum.

    Speaking personally, I have no problem and love to read contrary positions that are well presented. Usually that includes a brief explanation for the opinion. Someone who just screams “I hateX” or “Y is stupid” annoy me. If you hate X because he wants Universal Health Care or supports the elderly evicted from their homes then at least that is a reason.

  29. RBG says:

    Someone who just screams “I hateX” (sic) or “Y is stupid” annoy me.

    I know what you mean.

    RBG

  30. Axoneevom says:

    Since its inception, the internet has provided new ways for people all over the world to exercise the rights of free speech, freedom of the press and freedom of assembly. These rights are not simply the benefits of a free society–they are the very means of preserving that society’s freedom. The recent increase in government interference with these freedoms coincides with the failure of the corporate media to fulfill their vital role in checking the abuse of authority. Censorship and journalistic abdication have left citizens unaware and unable to hold their governments accountable.

    WikiLeaks has moved to fill the void left by traditional news media, providing the necessary information for citizens to hold their governments to account. Yet it has not been granted the legal protections generally afforded to journalists. Instead, the organization has been vilified and monetary support has been blocked by governments and private corporations. The vitriol aimed at WikiLeaks demonstrates an unsettling disregard for the fundamental freedom to exchange information and express ideas. Members of a free society must not allow information to be suppressed simply because it inconveniences those in power. We share the responsibility to defend vital liberties. The time to act is now.

    We are Anonymous, a leaderless movement that has worked tirelessly to oppose all forms of Internet censorship worldwide, from DMCA abuses to government mandated content filters. Our initiatives include supporting dissenting groups in Iran, Zimbabwe and Tunisia, as well as waging the highly visible information battle against the Church of Scientology. We are now prepared to take the fight to the world stage. Join us on January 15th for the first in a series of global protests in defense of WikiLeaks and freedom of expression. Stand with us to defend your freedoms.

    Visit http://whyweprotest.net to find out how you can participate.

    Or go directly to: http://forums.whyweprotest.net/events/ to find your local event. If no event exists for your city, then start it!


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 6972 access attempts in the last 7 days.