A law that would bar fast-food restaurants from opening in South Los Angeles for at least a year sailed through the Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday. The council approved the fast-food moratorium unanimously, despite complaints from representatives of McDonald’s, Carl’s Jr. and other companies, who said they were being unfairly targeted. Councilwoman Jan Perry, who has pushed for a moratorium for six years, said the initiative would give the city time to craft measures to lure sit-down restaurants serving healthier food to a part of the city that desperately wants more of them. “I believe this is a victory for the people of South and southeast Los Angeles, for them to have greater food options,” she said. The ban covers a 32-square-mile area for one year, with two possible six-month extensions.
The area contains about 500,000 residents, including those who live in West Adams, Baldwin Hills and Leimert Park. The law defines fast-food restaurants as “any establishment which dispenses food for consumption on or off the premises, and which has the following characteristics: a limited menu, items prepared in advance or prepared or heated quickly, no table orders and food served in disposable wrapping or containers.” A report released last year by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health found 30% of children in South L.A. were obese, compared with 25% of all children in the city.
I have lived in areas where zoning prohibited fast food restaurants from operating, but it was mostly for aesthetic reasons, and no one complained.
Maybe they suspect that rat-bag fast-food restaurants are a plague inflicted upon LA (and many other cities).
Perhaps they’re hoping that at a later date Anglicans realize that the last thing they need is another fast-food joint.
#21 – Raster Man
>>Perhaps they’re hoping that at a later date
>>Anglicans realize that the last thing they
>>need is another fast-food joint.
Then they might want to wait until the “Anglicans” make that determination, eh?
So now, instead of getting an affordable salad at McDonald’s or a grilled chicken sandwich at Wendy’s or an 89-cent bean burrito at Taco Bell, locals can get a 1,200 calorie megaburger at TGIF or Applebee’s for ten times the price? This is progress?
build condos
A moratorium today is better than being stuck with an uncontrolled mess down the road.
For anyone that thinks “fast food” is cheap should take a family of four to McDonald’s and look at the final tab.
If going to a sit down place is too expensive, maybe they shouldn’t be eating out anyway.
*
What most nimrods don’t realize is that we elect the City Council to run the city. That includes zoning. When you start calling this regulation function “Nanny State” you are really saying you wouldn’t mind if someone opened a 24 hour auto body shop right next door to your house, residential area be damned. If you object, then you are demonstrating how little you care about those who need their cars fixed.
Is controlling what people eat “Nanny State”? Geeze, how many people didn’t care about all the salmonella cases recently? How many people don’t care about rat droppings on their pork chops. How many people don’t care about the poisoned Chinese dog food?
#24,
It might be a little early, but so far no one has voiced any objections to the rat droppings on their pork chops.
Altering some of your everyday consuming habits can have an effect on your general wellness. This is most likely something that you currently knew. Did you know altering a number of the foods you consume daily can promote healthy joints and avoid combined problems this kind of as Arthritis and Osteoarthritis? Everybody in today’s globe appears to believe they are able to just consider pills for every thing. Whilst you can take pills, wouldn’t you instead change your meals intake and do things the nature way? There are lots of foods available that might help prevent many medical problems available. Here are some great meals for healthy joints.