The Royal Navy and BAE Systems plc were pleased as punch yesterday to announce that their implementation of Windows for Submarines™ is complete ahead of schedule. Windows boxes on Ethernet LANs are now in control of the UK’s nuclear-propelled and nuclear-armed warship fleet.
The programme is called Submarine Command System Next Generation (SMCS NG), and uses varying numbers of standard multifunction consoles with two LCD screens, hooked up on an internal Ethernet network installed on each sub. Initial reports as the programme developed suggested that the OS in question would be Windows 2000, but those who have worked on it have since informed the Reg that in fact it is mostly based on XP. “This is a fantastic achievement,” said Captain Pat O’Neill. “From speaking to operators and maintainers, I know how much they like SMCS NG. BAE Systems’ work is proof that we can get commercial off the shelf technology to sea quickly and support it affordably.”
Here on the Reg naval desk, we’d go relatively easy on submarine worries – even the Trident boats – as sub command LANs are by their nature very isolated and physically secure, and submarines almost never need to give their command systems autonomous firing authority. By contrast, however, an air-defence destroyer like the Type 45 – if it is to be much use – will fairly often have to give its collection of Windows boxes the ability to loose off a sheaf of Aster missiles without human authorisation. Shooting down the possible supersonic sea-skimmers of tomorrow will be even more impossible with the delays of having humans in the loop.
Just to add to the slight feeling of nerves, a destroyer LAN will need to be connected to other networks off the ship as a matter of routine, and physical access to a destroyer is hugely easier than to a sub as well.
So we aren’t really looking at Windows boxes triggering nuclear armageddon if something goes wrong here. But we just might, if things go wrong, be looking at a computer snag causing another USS Vincennes airliner shootdown disaster in coming years. Or, of course, at British sailors of the future staring helplessly at what would shortly be literally a blue screen of death, as the shipkillers bored in without response.
Fire when ready!












I would love to get in on this discussion, but then I would be on the same side as Paddy-o. So I will be forced to sit this one out.
I feel the urge to point out that not only is windows running on the computers, but the control surfaces were probably written in Visual Basic.
Our whole economy runs on Windows… wait…
Be grateful it’s not using OSX, otherwise the Royal navy’s budget would cost three times much and only in maintenance.
Well……can’t use a commie OS like Linux….
PLEASE some tell me a C64 is controlling these ships..
A 2004 article from the Register about the AMS systems (yes I know, the S is redundant).
It’s interesting to see that this systems battle has been going on for several years. It’s also important for hacks like me to learn yet again is that architectural choices (e.g. Unix vs Windows) are rarely made by sane rational decision processes – regardless of their outcome.
I can see it now…
Wondering the Ocean, and your laptop picks up a WIRELESS signal, and WINDOWS AUTO connects…
LOVELY…
I think I’ll go change my underwear now.
Get ready for the Blue Screendoor of Death.
I’m guessing they avoided Vista because of its driver revocation feature. Which could knock out some critical system, and not even tell them. On the other hand, adopting XP sounds somewhat like a PR move. Rather than using something like Linux or Unix, that could be thoroughly locked down. They chose what was most likely to be popular with the new recruits. It save the Royal Navy having to teach an unfamiliar OS to its members. And they can brag that the use of XP will carry into civilian jobs.
Fortunately for all the diesel-electric sub owning nations the implementation makes British subs slower and slower every year they are in service.
I can see it NOW…
the WHOLE ship is networked..
A few for wondering the net…For personal use..
For those that understand this..
SPAM BOTS and Virus ALL OVER the system.
Good for the Royal Navy to use off-the-shelf software, when possible.
One of the best ways to steal money from the troops under the Bush administration was to get a software contract for the DOD.
You could deliver totally unusable crap and still get paid millions.
Don’t worry !!! Its only HMS Pinafore !!!
That shows Windows OS is more powerful than what apple worms want you to know. Its much better to use a Windows that a fruity OS with a tiger name on it.
Windwos is good if you dont overflow it with too much bloatware. So i bet they are using the Windows in the submarine for a speicifc purpose only, so its getting the job done.
Dont blame the windows when you install 6 web browsers, 20 MP3 players, 30 Video players and your systems crashes. You have only yourself to blame.
“Hey Captain, look at this cool glassy effect on my system when I fire the torpedoes.” cries the navy guy running MacOS.
The dangers of this were not apparent to me until Zorkor said “windows in the submarine.” And yet he approves.
Like a lead balloon, I guess certain idioms of speech don’t translate.
Yeah, uh, ok…. I wonder if I could get a remote desktop going. I mean if they’re stupid enough to use windows they probrably don’t know jack about security, right? It sure would be sweet to be able to remote control a nuclear submarine from my living room!