Har! The Moral Voice of America indeed.

Found by the Warnerian.




  1. JimD says:

    What would you expect from Dildo O’Liely ???

  2. webstershamm says:

    I wonder if bill has nude slideshow pic’s of ann coulter and michele malkin on his ipornphone.

  3. bobbo says:

    #36–whats it all about Alfie?==if “a priori” a fish swims what does that tell us of a man walking?

  4. Paddy-O says:

    The amount of lib spittle here may cause the sea level rise that leftist nut jobs are always yammering about…

  5. Mr. Fusion says:

    #36, Alphie, the Qualude Queen

    If O’Reilly’s fictional work is relevant to analysis of world events,

    It isn’t. What is relevant is his condemnation of actions that he has approved of in his other words. Yes, it may be fiction, but that is not an excuse. He has condemned the porn industry when he himself has written it. He blamed a rape victim because of the way she was dressed as if that has something to do with the fact she was assaulted when he has written it

    In other words, for the critically challenged, your argument is unsound, and my Obama “analogy” is supposed illustrate that fact EVEN to you, a very irrational person.

    The second clause is totally incomprehensible.

    The question isn’t whether presidents experimented with drugs, the issue is whether YOUR reasoning is sound

    Ah, Alphie, you just condemned Obama because he admitted using drugs as a youth. That is the whole thrust of your argument. In #14 you wrote

    Good…now Obama’s past drug associates and customers need to come out…and tell us all about Obama’s words to them…

    Its relevant.

    I don’t see anything in that post about MY reasoning being sound. I asked you to show some proof that he sold drugs(post #25). Yes, he admitted experimenting in his book. You didn’t give us any proof he ever sold drugs, a much more serious accusation.

    Now, instead of supplying anything to back up your accusation, you want to claim my reasoning is unsound. Instead of replying to the question, you attack the questioner.

    Is that what “god” told you to do?

  6. Mr. Fusion says:

    #38, Cow-Paddy, Ignorant Shit Talking Sociopath, Retired Mall Rent-A-Cop, Pretend Constitutional Scholar, Fake California Labor Law Expert, Pseudo Military Historian, Phony Climate Scientist, and Real Leading Troll Extraordinare,

    The amount of lib spittle here may cause the sea level rise that leftist nut jobs are always yammering about…

    Damn, coming from a guy that couldn’t get a date in High School lecturing others on teen pregnancy, that is funny.

    I disparately want to add that to your handle, do you have any suggestions?

  7. bobbo says:

    #40–Fusion==you already have Paddy-Zero appropriately labeled as “Phony Climate Scientist” which is what that post was about.

    If you start listing his abscesses, warts, and open sores, the spam filter will catch you for excessive length.

  8. MikeN says:

    >There are very few successful writers that have written porn and serious literature.

    I see you haven’t read much serious literature, or perhaps you have and don’t remember the porn, since it rarely gets treated to this level of scrutiny.

  9. Mr. Fusion says:

    #43, Alphie, Quaalude Queen,

    I still haven’t seen anything backing up your accusation that Obama sold drugs. I do see a lot of obfuscation, word play, ad hominems, and bullshit.

    So? where is your evidence that Obama sold drugs?

    AND

    Please explain this sentence:

    In other words, for the critically challenged, your argument is unsound, and my Obama “analogy” is supposed illustrate that fact EVEN to you, a very irrational person.

    Geeze, my nine y/o writes better than that. Yes, I know it’s a blog but I did ask you to explain it before.

  10. Mr. Fusion says:

    #46, Alphie, the Quaalude Queen,

    You still haven’t answered the original question.

    WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT OBAMA SOLD DRUGS?

    Reasoned argument not your forte?

    Most people can see your feeble attempt to baffle ’em with your bullshit.

  11. Mr. Fusion says:

    #44, Stooopid Lyin’ Mike,

    >There are very few successful writers that have written porn and serious literature.

    I see you haven’t read much serious literature,

    Since the discussion is about authors and not literature, you are demonstrating your new moniker. Ann Rice might be successful, but I don’t think of her as serious. J.K. Rowlings on the other hand, is a serious writer.

  12. MikeN says:

    Bill O’Reilly? Al Franken? Rush Limbaugh? James Patterson? John LeCarre? Tom Clancy? William Buckley? John Grisham?

    Have any of these guys written serious literature?

    Now how about Tom Wolfe, Shakespeare, Maya Angelou, Toni Morrison, Judy Blume?

  13. Greg Allen says:

    Ironic isn’t it? The movement that has preached its moral virtues for decades reveals itself to be a shameful moral disaster.

    But we liberals, who preach tolerance, are no worse — and often better than they.

  14. Greg Allen says:

    spot the chalitran,

    No, this is not a page out of Karl Rove’s playbook.

    Karl Rove playbook is to UTTERLY DESTROY HIS OPPONENTS — with total LIES if necessary.

    This video is just showing that Bill O’Reilly is kind of creepy, yet he’s made of moralistic finger wagging.

    O’Relly’s gonna be fine. His followers don’t care about this stuff.

  15. Greg Allen says:

    Mr. Fusion,

    Shakespeare was pretty bawdy for his day, if I remember my college literature class correctly.

    We miss a lot of it, because of the flowery old English but it was pretty sexual.

    But, unlike O’Reilly, Shakespeare didn’t make a career of preaching moral virtue.

    This book doesn’t even bother me much — writing about creepy stuff does not make a person sleazy. (necessarily)

    If you want to see what a REAL LIFE sleezebag O’Reilly is — go find the deposition to his sexual harassment suit on Smoking Gun or similar.

    And, we know perfectly well that O’Reailly not unique at all — the loudest preachers of “family values” in the conservative movement have proven themselves to be total moral disasters in their own lives: Limbaugh, Haggard, Gingrich, Dole, McCain, Craig, — the whole pack of ’em.

  16. MikeN says:

    >Shakespeare was pretty bawdy for his day, if I remember my college literature class correctly.

    My point exactly. George Allen lost a Senate seat when he didn’t realize that.

  17. Paddy-O says:

    And, the libs are STILL squealing like stuck pigs on this thread. Hilarious.

  18. contempt says:

    #50 Gregg Allen
    >>But we liberals, who preach tolerance, are no worse — and often better than they.

    It’s hard to preach tolerance with much success when you believe it means anyone who disagrees with you is intolerant.

    Liberals aren’t any better or worse than anyone else, it’s just that they are miserable bastards on a mission to force their never-ending discontent on everyone else.

  19. Mr. Fusion says:

    #53, Stooopid Lyin’ Mike

    Your point? The point you ever made was that one between your ears on top that causes your hat to fall off.

    Allen lost his Senate seat because he screwed up. He called a spectator a slur. He was in a close race against a conservative Democrat. He couldn’t articulate during his debate. In other words, he blew it. Most of all, he was on Bushes side.

    Regardless, none of that has anything to do with O’Reilly.

  20. Mr. Fusion says:

    #52, Greg, Allen,

    I know where you are coming from, but, “bawdy” does not equal “pornographic”. Just as “racy” does not equal “obscene” and “dressed sexy” does not equal an “excuse to rape”.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5315 access attempts in the last 7 days.