Har! The Moral Voice of America indeed.
Found by the Warnerian.
The Man on the Street Reacts to Conservative Talk Show Host’s Pornographic Audiobook
Published on March 25th, 2009
57 users responded in " The Man on the Street Reacts to Conservative Talk Show Host’s Pornographic Audiobook "
Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
# 1 bobbo said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 8:30 am
Erotic, not pornographic-unless you are as F’ed-up as alterboy Oreilly is.
# 2 Buzz said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 8:42 am
What a talented speller and reader he turned out to be.
# 3 Ian said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 8:46 am
How do you go from this cheesy erotica shit to a moral voice for America.
I can’t reconcile this shit.
# 4 bobbo said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 8:48 am
#3–Ian==the gonads in a young man produce semen and sex hormones. In an old man they produce bile.
# 5 MikeN said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 8:54 am
About typical for most bestsellers. Even William Buckley had the ‘obligatory sex scene.’ They should hire an ensemble cast for the audio versions, unless this was intended as comedy.
# 6 Mr Diesel said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 8:56 am
Who said Oreilly was the moral voice of America?
I do love his rant that was caught on camera and I thought it was dirtier than this BS.
# 7 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 9:11 am
#6, Diesel,
Who said Oreilly was the moral voice of America?
O’Reilly does. That is his whole persona.
# 8 Mr Diesel said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 10:07 am
#7 Mr Fusion
Much as I like some of the things he says I just don’t think I like him as a person and he sure as hell doesn’t speak for me.
# 9 dumbassliberals said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 10:21 am
he’s just another dumbass in the media…
# 10 spot the charlatan said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 10:26 am
Good for Mr. O
Bill worships a big god, and with such a big cross wedged up his butt I thought he was incapable of such thoughts. I’m surprised this is about a male female encounter he seems to spend so much time thinking about same gender pairings these days.
# 11 Sinn Fein said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 10:42 am
Larry Flynn Shakespeare he ain’t.
# 13 jerry said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 11:52 am
hypocrite.
# 14 Alfred1 said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Good…now Obama’s past drug associates and customers need to come out…and tell us all about Obama’s words to them…
Its relevant.
# 15 MikeN said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 12:29 pm
Having read the novel, it certainly wouldn’t qualify as pornographic, except in maybe a Mel Gibson sense.
It is about a network reporter who takes revenge and kills all of the network people who wronged him in the past.
# 16 Cursor_ said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 12:52 pm
I don’t think people quite got it.
He says hey baby put down THAT PIPE and get mine up.
So its DRUGS & SEX.
Now isn’t that dandy?
Cursor_
# 17 Paddy-O said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 12:55 pm
You can smell the lib panic in the air. LOL
# 18 soundwash said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
rofl…that’s porno??
-can anyone still doubt that mainstream media is all about fantasy/ratings and nothing to do with reality/substance?
-would love to see o’reilly’s face when commenting on that clip.
-s
# 19 comhcinc said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
lol i heard about this book (and that scene) years ago. al frankin pretty much reproduced it word for word in one of his books.
# 20 Dallas said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Next Bill O show:
BO: “Go ahead fair and balanced caller”
Caller: “Hi, Bill. Love your show. Thanks for keeping those hypocrite, lying libs in check.”
BO: “Yeah, yeah, what’s up”
Caller: “Hey, wassup with that porno audio book you did. Did you really want to stick that pipe up that child’s privates? Did you kiss your mother with that mouth?”
BO: “Cut the fuck’n tape….Go ahead fair and balanced caller”
# 21 amodedoma said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 1:57 pm
Sure but did he record/write it before, during, or after being a school teacher. Friggin’ hypocrite. Anybody who takes Oreily seriously deserves to be in a coma. Yeah you can trust the cultural warrior, he’ll save you from the radical left agenda. If you can believe that, you are gullible. Yeah, I know it’s not in the dictionary….
# 22 ronwp54 said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Typical left nutballs, you can’t logically argue against the message, so you scour through every bit of a persons life looking for something to try an destroy them personally. If this is the worst you can find you should go back to rummaging thru Bill’s garbage for some better material.
# 23 Angel H. Wong said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 2:49 pm
To Republicans it’s okay because:
a) It’s fantasy so it’s no real proof of an orgams.
b) It’s not gay sex.
# 24 spot the charlatan said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 3:07 pm
#22
“you can’t logically argue against the message, so you scour through every bit of a persons life looking for something to try an destroy them personally”
Straight out of the Karl Rove play book.
# 25 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 3:20 pm
#14, Alphie,
Good…now Obama’s past drug associates and customers need to come out…and tell us all about Obama’s words to them…
Its relevant.
Please explain how it is relevant. And please post some source for your accusation Obama sold drugs.
We all realize your extreme fanaticism. We also are aware of how your god told you to forgive and love your fellow man. If it was good enough for Bush and Boss Limpdick to do drugs, it should be just peachy for others to have experimented.
You do remember experimenting. Like when the Youth Pastor gave you that pill that made you dizzy.
# 26 deowll said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
Not high class. When did this occur and why should I care? He wasn’t running around with terrorist or something.
# 27 Alfred1 said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 3:47 pm
Mr. Fusion said, on March 25th, 2009 at 3:20 pm
#14, Alphie,
Good…now Obama’s past drug associates and customers need to come out…and tell us all about Obama’s words to them…
Its relevant.
Please explain how it is relevant.
Glad too…if O’Reilly’s fictional works somehow invalidates his commentary on the news…then Obama’s past drug use invalidates his work as President.
If O’reilly should stop, so should Obama.
As for Obama’s past drug use…and sales…see his books.
As for my former drug use…I once was a like you, drug crazed…irrational…slandering all who disagreed…
Yes…we can tell by your posts the chemicals were good…but that does not mean we want to remain in a rut, as you have…the 60′s are over.
# 28 Jim said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 4:23 pm
#17. “You can smell the lib panic in the air. LOL”
Panic? What the Fuck are you talking about? Your mommy really needs to up your meds son.
# 29 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 4:45 pm
#27, Alphie,
…if O’Reilly’s fictional works somehow invalidates his commentary on the news…then Obama’s past drug use invalidates his work as President.
That does not explain anything. O’Reilly promotes his image as All-American. The passages read from his book don’t sound very “wholesome” to me. They sound quite hypocritical.
There are very few successful writers that have written porn and serious literature. The closest he could ever get to James Joyce or Terry Southern would be to pop some acid and dream on. Maybe he already did.
BTW, I don’t see you invalidating Bushes Presidency because his reputation as a free for all drug addict and drunk is well mentioned.
Reagan also smoked pot with Errol Flynn and David Niven (see Bring on the Empty Horses). Of course, all Presidents drank alcohol both before and while in office.
# 30 bobbo said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
#29–Fusion==I don’t see what is written by a struggling author as fiction as a young man as establishing hypocrisy of any sort for positions taken later in life “unless” O’Reilly criticized someone else for the same thing without revealing his own efforts.
In fact, having committed the sin/crime he is in the best position to comment on the harm it causes.
Alfred is becoming quite inane and irrelevant, thats true without hypocrisy no matter what the background of a commenter.
# 31 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 5:41 pm
#30, Bobbo,
I don’t see what is written by a struggling author as fiction as a young man as establishing hypocrisy of any sort for positions taken later in life
I agree. But apparently Alphie wants to “invalidate” Obama as a bad President for having experimented with drugs as a teen. Like 90% of Americans have done, including, by his own admission, Alphie. In my opinion, very few people should have their juvenile actions follow them through their whole lives.
BUT, if you later on decide to criticize others for similar actions, be prepared to be called out for it. BTW, this was published around 1998 and O’Reilly wasn’t that struggling a person.
The Book
Those who Trespass: A Novel of Murder and Television
By Bill O’Reilly
Published by Bancroft Press, 1998
ISBN 0963124684, 9780963124685
288 pages
# 32 bobbo said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
#31–Fusion==that recently huh? Popular novelist Grisham jokes that he can’t write sex scenes so he doens’t even try.
Bill-O should take the same advice==that passage that is provided is about as lame as I have ever heard.
I’ve played with the notion of writing fiction myself but years ago heard that a good author will not use phrases they have read/hear before. Being about as unoriginal as possible, that guideline keeps me from even trying. Didn’t hold Anne Rice back any at all however.
I’m jut a critic, not an artist.
# 33 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 5:50 pm
#30, Bobbo,
Please excuse me. All this talk about O’Reilly has given me an extreme need to shower.
# 34 JimD said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
What would you expect from Dildo O’Liely ???
# 35 webstershamm said,
on March 25th, 2009 at 6:57 pm
I wonder if bill has nude slideshow pic’s of ann coulter and michele malkin on his ipornphone.
# 36 Alfred1 said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 3:17 am
#27, Alphie,
…if O’Reilly’s fictional works somehow invalidates his commentary on the news…then Obama’s past drug use invalidates his work as President.
That does not explain anything. O’Reilly promotes his image as All-American. The passages read from his book don’t sound very “wholesome” to me. They sound quite hypocritical.
Non sequitur…O’relly never promoted THAT WORK OF FICTION as “all American” therefore my argument remains valid…
If O’Reilly’s fictional work is relevant to analysis of world events, then Obama’s past drug use is also. Both have the same connection.
In other words, for the critically challenged, your argument is unsound, and my Obama “analogy” is supposed illustrate that fact EVEN to you, a very irrational person.
There are very few successful writers that have written porn and serious literature. The closest he could ever get to James Joyce or Terry Southern would be to pop some acid and dream on. Maybe he already did.
BTW, I don’t see you invalidating Bushes Presidency because his reputation as a free for all drug addict and drunk is well mentioned.
Reagan also smoked pot with Errol Flynn and David Niven (see Bring on the Empty Horses). Of course, all Presidents drank alcohol both before and while in office.
Again you argue like a girly man, irrational. The question isn’t whether presidents experimented with drugs, the issue is whether YOUR reasoning is sound…if O’Reilly’s analysis of the news is “a priori” wrong because of fictional statements, THEN Obama’s grasp of reality is “a priori” wrong because of his past actions with drugs…
But it is plausible to suppose the chemicals you once addled your brain with…were first class, as they seem to continue to addle your brain.
# 37 bobbo said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 4:29 am
#36–whats it all about Alfie?==if “a priori” a fish swims what does that tell us of a man walking?
# 38 Paddy-O said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 5:53 am
The amount of lib spittle here may cause the sea level rise that leftist nut jobs are always yammering about…
# 39 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 6:32 am
#36, Alphie, the Qualude Queen
If O’Reilly’s fictional work is relevant to analysis of world events,
It isn’t. What is relevant is his condemnation of actions that he has approved of in his other words. Yes, it may be fiction, but that is not an excuse. He has condemned the porn industry when he himself has written it. He blamed a rape victim because of the way she was dressed as if that has something to do with the fact she was assaulted when he has written it
In other words, for the critically challenged, your argument is unsound, and my Obama “analogy” is supposed illustrate that fact EVEN to you, a very irrational person.
The second clause is totally incomprehensible.
The question isn’t whether presidents experimented with drugs, the issue is whether YOUR reasoning is sound
Ah, Alphie, you just condemned Obama because he admitted using drugs as a youth. That is the whole thrust of your argument. In #14 you wrote
Good…now Obama’s past drug associates and customers need to come out…and tell us all about Obama’s words to them…
Its relevant.
I don’t see anything in that post about MY reasoning being sound. I asked you to show some proof that he sold drugs(post #25). Yes, he admitted experimenting in his book. You didn’t give us any proof he ever sold drugs, a much more serious accusation.
Now, instead of supplying anything to back up your accusation, you want to claim my reasoning is unsound. Instead of replying to the question, you attack the questioner.
Is that what “god” told you to do?
# 40 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 6:39 am
#38, Cow-Paddy, Ignorant Shit Talking Sociopath, Retired Mall Rent-A-Cop, Pretend Constitutional Scholar, Fake California Labor Law Expert, Pseudo Military Historian, Phony Climate Scientist, and Real Leading Troll Extraordinare,
The amount of lib spittle here may cause the sea level rise that leftist nut jobs are always yammering about…
Damn, coming from a guy that couldn’t get a date in High School lecturing others on teen pregnancy, that is funny.
I disparately want to add that to your handle, do you have any suggestions?
# 41 bobbo said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 6:44 am
#40–Fusion==you already have Paddy-Zero appropriately labeled as “Phony Climate Scientist” which is what that post was about.
If you start listing his abscesses, warts, and open sores, the spam filter will catch you for excessive length.
# 42 Alfred1 said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 6:53 am
# 37 bobbo said, on March 26th, 2009 at 4:29 am
#36–whats it all about Alfie?==if “a priori” a fish swims what does that tell us of a man walking?
Answer: Nothing.
While your illustration of a non sequitur isn’t analogous, just anal, it evidently made sense to you.
Glad to see you go it now.
# 43 Alfred1 said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 7:09 am
# 29 Mr. Fusion said
I don’t see anything in that post about MY reasoning being sound
Precisely my point, your conclusions are always unsound…even when correct, they are predicated upon non sequiturs.
#27, Alphie,
…if O’Reilly’s fictional works somehow invalidates his commentary on the news…then Obama’s past drug use invalidates his work as President.
That does not explain anything. O’Reilly promotes his image as All-American. The passages read from his book don’t sound very “wholesome” to me. They sound quite hypocritical.
O’Reilly doesn’t promote his image as “All American, which term is ambiguous…
For your argument to be correct, O’Reilly would have to promote his image as including past porn fiction, but declaring the image as “free of porn.”
That contradiction is not found in O’Reilly statements, ONLY in your conclusion,” which is seeing what isn’t there, and taking offense at it.
I’ll give you this, your conclusions are consistently unsound, even when they are correct, your belief in them is for unsound reasons…
Before you reply, learn what “unsound” means.
# 44 MikeN said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 7:52 am
>There are very few successful writers that have written porn and serious literature.
I see you haven’t read much serious literature, or perhaps you have and don’t remember the porn, since it rarely gets treated to this level of scrutiny.
# 45 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 8:58 am
#43, Alphie, Quaalude Queen,
I still haven’t seen anything backing up your accusation that Obama sold drugs. I do see a lot of obfuscation, word play, ad hominems, and bullshit.
So? where is your evidence that Obama sold drugs?
AND
Please explain this sentence:
In other words, for the critically challenged, your argument is unsound, and my Obama “analogy” is supposed illustrate that fact EVEN to you, a very irrational person.
Geeze, my nine y/o writes better than that. Yes, I know it’s a blog but I did ask you to explain it before.
# 46 Alfred1 said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 9:18 am
# 45 Mr. Fusion said, on March 26th, 2009 at 8:58 am
#43, Alphie, Quaalude Queen,
I still haven’t seen anything backing up your accusation that Obama sold drugs. I do see a lot of obfuscation, word play, ad hominems, and bullshit.
So? where is your evidence that Obama sold drugs?
AND
Please explain this sentence:
In other words, for the critically challenged, your argument is unsound, and my Obama “analogy” is supposed illustrate that fact EVEN to you, a very irrational person.
Geeze, my nine y/o writes better than that. Yes, I know it’s a blog but I did ask you to explain it before.
Reasoned argument not your forte?
U should have looked up the word “sound/unsound” first…
Obama’s drug use is irrelevant to your conclusions…and the non sequiturs upon which you found them.
# 47 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 10:15 am
#46, Alphie, the Quaalude Queen,
You still haven’t answered the original question.
WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT OBAMA SOLD DRUGS?
Reasoned argument not your forte?
Most people can see your feeble attempt to baffle ‘em with your bullshit.
# 48 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 10:21 am
#44, Stooopid Lyin’ Mike,
>There are very few successful writers that have written porn and serious literature.
I see you haven’t read much serious literature, …
Since the discussion is about authors and not literature, you are demonstrating your new moniker. Ann Rice might be successful, but I don’t think of her as serious. J.K. Rowlings on the other hand, is a serious writer.
# 49 MikeN said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 10:38 am
Bill O’Reilly? Al Franken? Rush Limbaugh? James Patterson? John LeCarre? Tom Clancy? William Buckley? John Grisham?
Have any of these guys written serious literature?
Now how about Tom Wolfe, Shakespeare, Maya Angelou, Toni Morrison, Judy Blume?
# 50 Greg Allen said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 3:02 pm
Ironic isn’t it? The movement that has preached its moral virtues for decades reveals itself to be a shameful moral disaster.
But we liberals, who preach tolerance, are no worse — and often better than they.
# 51 Greg Allen said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
spot the chalitran,
No, this is not a page out of Karl Rove’s playbook.
Karl Rove playbook is to UTTERLY DESTROY HIS OPPONENTS — with total LIES if necessary.
This video is just showing that Bill O’Reilly is kind of creepy, yet he’s made of moralistic finger wagging.
O’Relly’s gonna be fine. His followers don’t care about this stuff.
# 52 Greg Allen said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 3:19 pm
Mr. Fusion,
Shakespeare was pretty bawdy for his day, if I remember my college literature class correctly.
We miss a lot of it, because of the flowery old English but it was pretty sexual.
But, unlike O’Reilly, Shakespeare didn’t make a career of preaching moral virtue.
This book doesn’t even bother me much — writing about creepy stuff does not make a person sleazy. (necessarily)
If you want to see what a REAL LIFE sleezebag O’Reilly is — go find the deposition to his sexual harassment suit on Smoking Gun or similar.
And, we know perfectly well that O’Reailly not unique at all — the loudest preachers of “family values” in the conservative movement have proven themselves to be total moral disasters in their own lives: Limbaugh, Haggard, Gingrich, Dole, McCain, Craig, — the whole pack of ‘em.
# 53 MikeN said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 3:48 pm
>Shakespeare was pretty bawdy for his day, if I remember my college literature class correctly.
My point exactly. George Allen lost a Senate seat when he didn’t realize that.
# 54 Paddy-O said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 3:50 pm
And, the libs are STILL squealing like stuck pigs on this thread. Hilarious.
# 55 contempt said,
on March 26th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
#50 Gregg Allen
>>But we liberals, who preach tolerance, are no worse — and often better than they.
It’s hard to preach tolerance with much success when you believe it means anyone who disagrees with you is intolerant.
Liberals aren’t any better or worse than anyone else, it’s just that they are miserable bastards on a mission to force their never-ending discontent on everyone else.
# 56 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 27th, 2009 at 6:58 am
#53, Stooopid Lyin’ Mike
Your point? The point you ever made was that one between your ears on top that causes your hat to fall off.
Allen lost his Senate seat because he screwed up. He called a spectator a slur. He was in a close race against a conservative Democrat. He couldn’t articulate during his debate. In other words, he blew it. Most of all, he was on Bushes side.
Regardless, none of that has anything to do with O’Reilly.
# 57 Mr. Fusion said,
on March 27th, 2009 at 7:03 am
#52, Greg, Allen,
I know where you are coming from, but, “bawdy” does not equal “pornographic”. Just as “racy” does not equal “obscene” and “dressed sexy” does not equal an “excuse to rape”.
Leave Your Reply Below...
Comment Moderation is Active, so if your comment doesn't
show up immediately, please don't submit it again.
Special Deals 4U
-
25% off eHarmony subscription with code EHTECH
12-percent discount forever with code TECH
10-percent discount and free month using TECH10
10-percent or 30 dollars off weekly car rental!
Get 10-percent discount on car rental!
Get 10% off rental cars!
Get 10% off Dollar rentals!
Discounts on domain names!
Stock Market Advice
New!!
Blogroll
- 2005 Personal Portal - — handy all text personal research portal — great links!
- About Us (Masthead)
- Actual Review of Top Horoscope Websites
- Amsterdam
- Blog Primer - Introduction for new readers
- Child SAFE Personal Portal - Fun portal for children
- Comment Guidelines for those Wishing to Add Comments
- Copenhagen - various pics from Copenhagen and environs
- Cranky Geeks Online Vidcast - New half hour discussion with grumbling geeks
- Ft. Worth, Texas
- How to Use this Blog - What this Blog is All About
- Links to Older Essays and Archives
- Northern Spain
- October 2006 Video Archive
- Ongoing Review Of WordPress - Dvorak’s look at WordPress
- Monday’s PC Magazine Column Online and print columns posted for online viewing- Public Speaking - Information Regarding Public Speaking
- September 2006 Video Archive
- Short BIO of John C. Dvorak - Short bio of John C. Dvorak
- Should Your CEO Become a Blogger? - Discussion of PR benefits of CEO blogs.
- Six Flags/Marine World
- Slovenia
- Solano Stroll/Lomography
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Tech5 Daily Podcast
- Terms of Use/Privacy Policy - legal
- This Week in Technology (Podcast)
- Venice
- Weekly Dow-Jones Marketwatch Column - Column appearing every Wednesday on CBS Marketwatch: \
- Whatever Happened to Alaskan Airlines? - A Commentary on West Coast Air Travel
- Spam! End it! Here’s How.
Stock Market Help!
Syndicate
-
Subscribe to Main Blog feed here:
Subscribe to Comments too (below):
