This ditty keeps disappearing from the net. Watch it and weep!




  1. Jim says:

    While I somewhat agree that Monsanto is wrong in many ways and I definitely think GM seeds should not be patentable — I find this “documentary” very one-sided and “eco-flametory”, which undermines it completely.

    Most of the testimonials and discussions were with people that agreed with her pre-conclusions, and were also to support the idea that ALL GMO is wrong.

    GMO is a very good idea that has to be controlled properly, by scientists and governments.

    But in any case, she undermines her arguments by not talking to those who are SUPPORTIVE of the GMOs and how the government has handled the situation. As a consequence, I find this is greenpeace anti-GMO propaganda. Also she uses the internet quite a lot but doesn’t go and do strong fieldwork to back up the conclusions she and other take. Did she find and validate each of the articles she pulls up? Did she check multiple studies and give them to an independent group of scientists to analyze for conclusions? She also appears to take most people at their word as to how things happened or didn’t happen.

    Again, I don’t like Monsanto any more than they do, but without a thorough, scientific and un-biased look at the issues I can’t agree this was worth watching. And it doesn’t further their idea except amongst the “faithful”.

  2. Arnold the pig says:

    Thanks for putting this movie up, John. I am thankful that I am 60 years old, and won’t be around to see the mess this world is headed for. I’ll be living harder from now on, to spend all my money before the end. Too bad for my kid, but he is doomed, I guess.

  3. Curb says:

    Great documentary, even if she does try to use the number of google search results as some sort of scientific proof towards how bad Monsanto is.

  4. Hippie Broads says:

    She lost me when she pronounced the word “aspartame” as “as-par-tuh-mee.”

    I’m sure that’s one part of her, and that’s where her brain is located.

  5. TMcCoy says:

    #8 Yeah too bad it takes years for drugs to get approved, I want the new xanax to come out I’m starting to get bored with it. (j/k)

    If you think that the threat of law suits are what prevents stuff like “anti house fire stoves” from coming out then you’re retarded. Any 2bit lawyer can build a strong enough legal statement that claims do not guarantee prevention of house fires that would hold up in court and prevent a suit from getting anywhere.

  6. pedro says:

    I stopped watching when I learnt it was a french film.

    #5 So they got a lawsuit vaccine?

  7. SparkyOne says:

    from my local paper today!

    FIRST, KILL THE LAWN

    If you want to convert a section of thirsty lawn into a productive garden, you first need to kill the grass. Spraying unwanted lawn with the herbicide glyphosate (trade name Roundup) is an easy and safe way to kill all lawn grasses including Bermuda grass and other grasses that spread by runners. Green foliage absorbs this systemic herbicide which moves throughout the plant including underground roots and stems.

    Grass and weeds that have not been watered for a while are tough and hard to kill. For best results, water the area well for one or two weeks before you spray. This will produce tender new leaves that will absorb more of the chemical.

  8. B.Dog says:

    Thanks for the video, John. It was a real eye opener. My sympathies and apologies go out to all the small farmers around the world.

    If she did the video today, I bet she would Google bees Monsanto, which turns up some ugly pages. It’s my guess that the current global famine of biblical proportions is just the tip of the iceberg, metaphorically speaking.

  9. Xanthippa says:

    There are two issues which the movie did not stress enough, but which are very, very important.

    #1.
    When a company – any company – produces BOTH a potent plant-killer AND ‘owns’ the ONLY plants that are immune to it, that company can gain control over our food supply. Think about it.

    #2.
    It is no more difficult to insert the ‘terminator gene’ into either gamete. It could just as easily have been spliced into the female gamete (which is the bit that turns into the seed – and so remains on the plant) as it was to splice it into the male gamete: pollen, which is blown around by the wind and carried about by insects. Yet, Monsanto chose to insert the terminator gene into the highly mobile pollen….

    Why?

    Think about it: this has the potential to be a biological weapon.

  10. ECA says:

    KEYWORD:
    as to any company,
    is PROFIT.
    The company dont care if you dont make any, ONLY THEY will make profit.
    Even if they have to create the problem to make sales of the solution.

  11. Thinker says:

    #6 ok, I’ll make you a deal. I’ll fly you out here and you can drink a glass of the stuff we’ll go buy. I’ll guarentee I’ll call 911 when you drop. (How can you make this claim, are you serious??)

  12. ThePirateBay says:

    http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4098947/World_According_to_Monsanto_-_DVDRip_English.mp4

    There ya go, the full thing, and remember, please seed!

  13. Thinker says:

    got it! got it! got it! thanks! :)

  14. James says:

    When do you think Monsanto is going to change its name to “Soylent Corporation”?



Bad Behavior has blocked 25314 access attempts in the last 7 days.