Global Warming Fraud — This should be interesting.
Finally, efforts are being made by the founder of the Weather Channel, John Coleman, to sue Al Gore and his cohorts for perpetrating “the greatest scam in history” — the fraud of global warming. Thirty thousand others, comprised of scientists and experts, are also willing to join in that lawsuit.
So how did this fraud all get started? It all started in Chicago shortly after Earth Day, April 17, 1995, when Al Gore went to Fall River, Mass., to give his green sermon speech. He was soon joined by Maurice Strong and Peter Knight, a registered lobbyist and Gore’s former top Senate aid.
It didn’t take long before the Chicago Climate Exchange was formed and “a veritable rat’s nest of cronyism” was formed. The largest shareholder in the Exchange is Goldman Sachs, and Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley is its honorary chairman. The Joyce Foundation, which funded the Exchange, also funded money for John Ayers’ Chicago School Initiative. John is the brother of William Ayers who was one of the founders of the Weathermen.
Obama, at the time, was active in this scam and knew darn well what was going on, but three years later that did not stop him from funding these leaders in the man-made global warming movement. The first attempt to improve the environment was a grant of more than $25 million in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for research and development. That turned out to be a failure, so they were awarded another $8 million in federal taxpayer’s cash. That, too, was a failure. Present major funding is courtesy of Edward Rothschild’s World Bank.
Found by Mike Hutchins.
Regarding the claims that scientists are making a lot of money… it might be that it is not in large profits that could easily be questioned, but more likely is money effectively spread through government grants. Who is looking at the general grant distributions to scientists who spend grant dollars on assistants and supplies and lab space, and transportation costs, and even the base pay of the scientists working to prove global warming.
Equally important I think we would need to apply the same investigation to those who are not believers in this warming theory.
On both sides, the science appears like it requires more “faith” than understanding. More “belief” in certain assumptions, than hard facts that are not being spun to make a point within their side’s argument.
My final comment regarding this sad episode of science showing it’s collective weakness – an inability to handle disagreement once money gets involved – is that this arguement is science proving that high IQ’s and miles of research do not represent the wisdom people have used in the past, to get along and make the world a better place to live.
Lawyers… yeah that’s the ticket… they always make things better for everyone. Maybe that is the real motivation for all this weird science… lawsuits on the taxpayer dimes. EVen the great and good scientists are getting played. (Sigh)