I guess movies or fashion mags with Kiera Knightly where she’s naked would be illegal because her genes made her too flat chested.

The proposed Australian Government clampdown on smut just got a whole lot broader, as news emerged of a ban on small breasts and female ejaculation in adult material.

The end result of this widening of the censor’s net could be the addition of millions of websites to the internet filter now being proposed.

Breasts came under the spotlight a year ago, as Senators Barnaby Joyce and Guy Barnett commenced a campaign against publicly available porn. Rounding up magazines from corner shops and filling stations, Senator Joyce claimed that publications featuring small-breasted women were encouraging paedophilia.

The result of this campaign is now visible in the decisions being made by the Australian Classification Board, which is beginning to apply RC (refused classification) categories to such material, as opposed to the previous X-rating. According to Fiona Patten, Convenor of the Australian Sex Party: “We are starting to see depictions of women in their late 20s being banned because they have an A cup size.

“It may be an unintended consequence of the Senator’s actions but they are largely responsible for the sharp increase in breast size in Australian adult magazines of late.”




  1. Randomized says:

    What’s next, reverting back to 1970’s pubic hair styles?

  2. Cap'nKangaroo says:

    By this reasoning, can’t the entire sport of women’s gymnastics be banned as prurient.

  3. Jmsbrtms says:

    I’ve always felt the grade school and high school car washes that are run in the summer were prurient. We teach young girls to wave passing cars down for services while standing on a street corner. I’m amazed that in the name of raising money what parents will allow children to do. This law may not be a bad idea. I of course say this as a breast enthusiast.

  4. roastedpeanuts says:

    Australia has joined Britain on my list of countries I am never going to visit.

    What is wrong with these people???

  5. WaynePhilips says:

    Pictures of Kiera Knightly never caused thoughts of pedophilia for me. Just thoughts of naked small boobs on Kiera Knightly. Some people are twisted for the sake of being twisted.

  6. RBG says:

    It’s insane. Everyone knows banning the worst smut must eventually result in Nazi storm-troopers marching through the streets.

    RBG

  7. Dirk Thundernuts says:

    What big tits might look like:
    http://tinyurl.com/cwhnk6

  8. jccalhoun says:

    that’s what you get when you have no explicit freedom of speech.

  9. kap says:

    Someone should investigate Senators Barnaby Joyce and Guy Barnett. I can almost guarantee those two are sitting on mountains of the filthiest porn known to man. “Thou dost protest to much” says I.

  10. Fluffy Rabbit says:

    “Rounding up magazines from corner shops and filling stations, Senator [Barnaby] Joyce claimed that publications featuring small-breasted women were encouraging paedophilia.”

    Joyce is telling us a lot more about himself than he thinks.

  11. Chairman says:

    Are these people insane?

  12. Luc says:

    #9 That’s all there is to be said of this whole development. You nailed it.

  13. Nugget Coombs says:

    Senators Barnaby Joyce and Guy Barnett are a couple of Ultra-Right-Wing-Bible- Bashing Dinosaurs, as everyone here in Australia well know.
    Barnaby Joyce is a close relative of Barney Rubble of Bedrock, and Barnett is just another of what are colloquially referred to as “Very Old Men In Ties” or VOMIT!
    Take NO notice of what they say, as they will never be in any position of power, here in Australia, they are only a couple of senators in a very diminished opposition.

  14. sargasso says:

    Kiera is totally hot, any man can see that she is very much a woman and not just a kid. I suspect that there is more to this Australian senator.

  15. chris says:

    I support large breasted women! Aren’t ample heaving bosoms something on which we can find common ground?

  16. MIckyG says:

    Boy I’m getting a bit embarrassing to be an Aussie.

    Believe me, it’s really a group of conservatives pushing this. It’s really quite cleaver. They presented it as protecting children from child porn but then extend it. If you come out against the censorship you can be accused of supporting child porn. Brilliant!

  17. Animby says:

    Damn! Well, if I need any pron I guess I won’t be getting it from Oz. I like smallish breasts on a woman. I like hair on the pudenda, too. So I guess I’m a pedo with a hair fetish???

    As surmised above, I think this is much more telling about Messrs. Joyce and Barnett than the average Aussie Bruce.

    Either they were caught at a local gas station buying “Barely Legal” and had to come up with a quick explanation or they represent some rural area where stump-trained cattle with huge swinging udders are typical prom dates.

  18. Grim says:

    Me too MIckyG, to take it to it’s furthest extent, any man who has sex with a small breasted woman, is definitely a pedophile. As there can be no other reason to be interested in small breasted women.

    But what about women who like large breasted men? They must be lesbians!

  19. Chris Mac says:

    Rockem Sockem Supermodel. Can someone please push down on that poor girls head

  20. Aus Reader says:

    Oh geez.. I love how these stories are twisted.

    The Aus internet filters are totally opt-out capable. No questions asked.

    They’re just trying to clean up accidental filth.

    Believe me, we are a more liberal country than the USA. I mean you can’t even say sh*t, b*tch, show naked breasts or show ass crack or pubic hair on primetime free to air TV. We have no problem with any of it.

    Storm in a teacup

  21. Animby says:

    # 20 Aus Reader : Just curious – why did you censor shit and bitch? I mean you’re so liberal and all…

  22. stf says:

    ~aus reader very good @ sh*t and b*tch. also n*ked bre*sts, *ss cr*ck and pub*c h*ir for the sake of the children please~

  23. Uncle Dave says:

    #20: Fuck that. Say what you mean.

  24. LOWER CASE SCREEN NAME says:

    Porn shouldn’t be banned, it should be required. And there’s nothing wrong with more big breasts.

  25. LOWER CASE SCREEN NAME says:

    #7 That’s too much. Given a chance, I’d only have few inches sticking out the top of her cleavage.

  26. Buzz says:

    Oz pron is a major cause of neuristic euphemia. Corrupter of youth. Ruiner of social order.

  27. The0ne says:

    #4
    As I and finding more and more, what’s wrong with these people are years and years of the same snobbish, elitist attitude and personalities. I should say rich too but poor dumb Brits I’ve met are just as bad.

    Until I meet a good Brit I say fck them. At least with China, there are many bad people but there are some very good people as well 😀

    #11
    You can’t be seriously asking that question. You of all people here.

  28. deowll says:

    I can only assume that the law makers are speaking from how it makes them feel which means they need to be put on a watch list.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 5565 access attempts in the last 7 days.