‘Atheist Agenda’ Group Starts ‘Smut for Smut’ Campaign – myFOXphoenix.com: It’s part of a campaign called ‘Smut for Smut’ sponsored by the student group, ‘Atheist Agenda.’
“We are comparing their religious text to pr0n..” says group member Carlos Morales.
Oh, brother…
#99-Misanthropic Scott-Adam and Eve (the only two people on the planet) had two sons. The end.
See… not thinking again.
Do you really believe everything that happened ended up in the Bible? Do history books contain all information?
Of course God created more people than Adam and Eve. They happen to be significant for being the first people and their actions explain how sin was introduced into the world.
>>which story of the freeing of the Hebrew slaves is correct?
You are surprised there would be multiple versions of history? Even today we see liberals rewriting history to meet a political agenda.
Isn’t the Mexican version of US history different from the American version?
It would be fishy if there weren’t multiple views of what happened depending on points of view. After all, people are people and some things never change.
#100 – fred,
… it is “incest all the way down”.
Good one!! But, I’m not aware of anyplace in the bible talking about the children of Cain and Eve.
#101 – Dr Dodd,
Of course God created more people than Adam and Eve. They happen to be significant for being the first people and their actions explain how sin was introduced into the world.
But, they were created after the invention of agriculture and at a time when there were large scale civilizations on the planet. And, no one ever mentions this. You just made it up.
You are surprised there would be multiple versions of history? Even today we see liberals rewriting history to meet a political agenda.
I wouldn’t be surprised by multiple histories. But, first, one of these is ludicrous, hallucinogenic fantasy. Further, this is from a book claiming to be the word of god. Is your god incapable of getting it right?
And, Dr. Dodd, are you ever going to attempt to answer this one?
#94 Misanthropic Scott said, on March 10th, 2010 at 12:49 pm
#93 – Dr Dodd,
#92-Misanthropic Scott-You think I’m going to hell because I don’t sycophantically adore your god.
No, you will be judged by God on whether you accept or reject the free gift of salvation through the sacrifice of his Son Jesus Christ.
How are these statements different??!!?
Tell me, what happens to a good and decent human being who never hurts anyone, gives to charity, and does all the right things, but happens not to believe in jesus and maybe doesn’t believe in any god at all? Will such a person go to hell? What would the crime be?
Go ahead and answer.
When you think about this long enough, if you’re capable, you’ll know why I abhor your pedantic, little, officious, petty tyrant of an imaginary god.
Why are people incapable of dreaming up a god who does not have the manners and morals of a spoiled child? If we’re going to dream up an imaginary friend, how about actually starting with the definition of friend?
And, just for humor, at least we agree on something.
http://tinyurl.com/yexxlan
Damn! I forgot to answer this point of yours Dr. Dodd.
liberals rewriting history to meet a political agenda
Are you kidding??!!? It’s the Christians who are rewriting history, from the powerful Texas school board, to create a United States that is a Christian nation. Hateful, lying, bastards!!
#103-Misanthropic Scott-Tell me, what happens to a good and decent human being who never hurts anyone, gives to charity, and does all the right things, but happens not to believe in jesus and maybe doesn’t believe in any god at all? Will such a person go to hell? What would the crime be?
You are applying human feelings and perceived fairness to spiritual matters. There is a lot going on in the spiritual realm that influences why things are the way they are.
Back to your question, the crime is sin. No one gets into heaven that has committed a sin. Since everyone has sinned good works is a false path to heaven.
This is why we must accept Christ. He has already paid the price for our sins making the only requirement to accept the gift of salvation.
As far as rewriting history you can spin it anyway you want, but liberals are trying to remove from the history books all information about Washington, Madison, Edison, Einstein, etc. and replace it with leftist heroes and the politically correct.
Despicable!
Wow. Dr. Dodd. You are really mentally ill. But, you are a perfect willing slave. Thy will be done! Even if it means that god is a royal son of a bitch.
And, included in history are Jefferson (Deist and anti-Christian), Einstein (who did not believe in a personal god), and most important, a constitution that explicitly says we are not a Christian nation.
Jefferson: http://tinyurl.com/ybk8jqu
Particularly relevant to this discussion:
Einstein: http://tinyurl.com/yhghjhs
What part of that makes us a Christian nation??!!?
#106-Misanthropic Scott-Wow. Dr. Dodd. You are really mentally ill.
Lighten up Sheldon or I’ll whip out the kryptonite and call your mother.
#105: Dr Dodd
“This is why we must accept Christ. He has already paid the price for our sins making the only requirement to accept the gift of salvation.”
You keep saying things like that but what on earth does it really mean “He has already paid the price for our sins”? Look, if he existed, he was a revolutionary who was uncomfortable to the powers at the time and was duly disposed of. This has happened to thousands of people throughout the ages and will do so in the future. That has absolutely nothing to do with me or my beliefs or the way in which I choose to organize my life.
It seems to me that you just trot out trite phrases that you have heard thousands of times from preachers without really thinking what they mean or whether they are even logical.
Several of us have tried to ask you for answers to specific question and, on each occasion, you have either avoided the question or failed to give a direct answer because you are either incapable of or unwilling to do so. This is not particularly conducive to trusting or believing your position.
#107 – Dr Dodd,
#106-Misanthropic Scott-Wow. Dr. Dodd. You are really mentally ill.
Lighten up Sheldon or I’ll whip out the kryptonite and call your mother.
Go ahead and call her Penny. Unlike the “real” Sheldon, my Mom isn’t a Jesus freak and will agree with me about you.
Now go get your panties of the electrical wires.
#108 – fred,
what on earth does it really mean “He has already paid the price for our sins”?
It means that he died for our sins. So, if we don’t sin, he died for nothing. :O
Just out of curiosity Dr. Dodd, are you ever going to answer my question?
#94 Misanthropic Scott said, on March 10th, 2010 at 12:49 pm
#93 – Dr Dodd,
#92-Misanthropic Scott-You think I’m going to hell because I don’t sycophantically adore your god.
No, you will be judged by God on whether you accept or reject the free gift of salvation through the sacrifice of his Son Jesus Christ.
How are these statements different??!!?
#109-Misanthropic Scott-Unlike the “real” Sheldon, my Mom isn’t a Jesus freak and will agree with me about you. Now go get your panties of the electrical wires.
Too bad you don’t have a sense of humor. I was hoping to find some redeeming quality about you but I guess it was not to be.
#111-Misanthropic Scott-Just out of curiosity Dr. Dodd, are you ever going to answer my question?
OK – Your destination will be the same as Satan and of the fallen angels that chose to follow him.
The Lake of Fire.
#108-fred-Look, if he existed, he was a revolutionary who was uncomfortable to the powers at the time and was duly disposed of.
You don’t have to go to the Bible to know Jesus existed. The most obvious indication is the BC/AD – Before Christ/After Death method of measuring time.
Yes I agree, He is revolutionary.
Duly disposed of – I think not.
#113 – Dr Dodd,
The Lake of Fire.
But, he loves me. He loves me … and he needs money.
So, s/he’s going to ship me off to the lake of fire because I don’t sycophantically worship him/her. I’m glad you finally admit that the two statements are the same. My work here is done.
If you still think that sick bastard is worthy of your worship, go ahead and bend your knee to that pathetic, small minded, insecure, imaginary friend with the really bad temper. The desert war god is not for me.
As for my sense of humor, yes I have one. I got your joke, found it neither funny nor obnoxious, so I played along with it and followed it to its logical conclusion.
Did you have much trouble getting your panties off the electrical wires?
#114 – Dr Dodd,
I just love your definition of proof.
http://tinyurl.com/yen33pe
So, a notation that came about 525 years after the supposed death of Christ proves that Christ existed? You’ll have to get a whole lot closer to the time of his life than that to make that assertion.
How about something written during the time of his life? Do you have anything?
I thought not.
One controversial writing may or may not be genuine. Such is not proof of anything. However, since parts of it may be genuine, I accept the possibility that Jesus as flesh and blood may have existed. I just don’t see any proof either way.
http://tinyurl.com/5r3sb
So, I remain agJesusistic about the man and atheistic about the existence of any gods, let alone a petulant little child with multiple personality disorder, in the sky watching over everything I do and actually caring whether I sing praise to their name(s).