Insurance companies will love this. The Authorities will love this. Wives and husbands being cheated on will love this. In short anyone can, legally or with a little bribe money, find out where your car has been.
Congress is now eyeing new legislation that would force the automotive industry to make safety updates to vehicles in the wake of the massive recalls by Toyota. If the legislation were made into law, all automakers would be required to install black boxes into their automobiles and to pay fees to the government to fund safety agencies.
The black boxes would record vehicle parameters leading up to an accident to help investigators determine if the accident was an issue with the vehicle or driver error. The draft of the legislation was released by Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman of California. The legislation would also remove any caps on civil penalties a carmaker was subject to.
The legislation would also give the NHTSA the power to order an immediate recall of vehicles if it finds that there is an “imminent hazard of death or serious injury.” Other sections of the draft legislation would impose new safety standards that relate to brake override systems and preventing pedals from being trapped on the floor.
Skeptic–you say: “If you get hit making a left hand turn, its automatically your fault unless you have witnesses to prove otherwise.” //// I don’t believe you. Left turns at light controlled intersections could never have such a rule. On a two lane highway–sure.
I rear-ended a first time driver as she braked for no reason in the middle of making a right hand turn. I think she saw traffic coming in the opposite lane and braked for safety in case they came across the median line in a head on situation. I had to be very polite given my assumption proof she braked unreasonably would be difficult. Luckily, cars were not damaged, just bumped. Her adult supervisor had nothing to say either, so we both said “sorry” and went on our ways.
Just another case for a personal cam system that records everything we do and say. Good for winning arguments with the wifey. Mine will be mounted to a broonstick attached to my back back. Others may choose the model stuck up their ass.
tHE DEVICE LISTED ABOVE COULD BE USED for a few things..
IT WONT stop car wrecks..it wont stop idiot drivers..it wont stop cellphone users..
It can be used to discern what has happened to the car. IT CAN BE timed and dated, and you will see if there were Sudden stops and turns, if they speed, and with GPS…you dont want to know. The insurance corps would LOVE to know.
These devices could also be used by police. That do Stop checks to see if YOU had an accident or were driving TO FAST, DRUNK, other things. With GPS, they know WHERE and when you were.
NOW if you know your math, you could take the data and insert it in a computer and trace it BACKWARDS, and get a GOOD idea of where they have been, RECENTLY and long term..
Want to know where the box is in your car, going back to 1996?
http://www.seniormag.com/headlines/blackboxcars.htm
Law of unintended consequences: old cars without the black box will suddenly become very valuable, and mechanics will be busy keeping those old cars running.
This isn’t about accidents or invading your privacy, it’s solely about taxes.. at this point. Texas and a number of other states have been testing ‘pay-as-you-go’ car insurance, etc. If I recall Progressive was running it.
Many states are drooling at the concept of applying road taxes based on usage. The more you drive, the more you pay. Utopian or Draconian, up to you.
Only a moron thinks the governments gives a crap about your safety beyond keeping you breathing so you can pay your taxes.
Waxman has always been a puppet, look for the strings. Crap ‘n Trade, now this. Trying to piggyback it onto the Toyota shakedown is kinda lazy. But hey we’re getting dumber, so why make an effort.
Incumbents out in 2010.
Is there anyway this gizmo could detect cell phone use while driving and issue a ticket?
Now THAT would make our roads safer. I am so fed-up with these narcissistic jerks swerving around while distracted by whatever little drama they go going on their cell phones.
OnStar…any questions?
Since when do the insurers care whose fault an accident was? That’s why they came up with “No Fault” insurance. Because it cut out the expense of paying investigators, and the litigation costs. Back when I had a fender bender in 1980. My insurer wasn’t even interested in it being someone else’s fault. And my rate went up for a while, regardless. Some years later, a rent van clip my car’s front fender. I got the license number and call the claim into my insurer that afternoon, at work. An “investigator” for the other party came to my house to asses the damage. And two weeks later I was informed that since the van was being used for personal use (picking up a pizza, for the rental agents), and not under lease. The insurer didn’t have to pay me anything! Some sort of limited use insurance, for commercial use. Sweet deal for the renter. But I got stuck with the bill, my insurer had to cover what my deductable didn’t. They didn’t have the balls to pursue the driver of the van.
So all in all, I highly doubt these “black boxes” are for the insurance carriers’ interest. More like it’s for the automakers’ protection, from false claims. But they’re getting the gov. to require it. And pretend to be a “big brother” about it. Rather than doing it on their own, and taking the PR heat for it.
Kind of like how the cigarette makers lobbied Congress to have Tv ads removed. When they were faced with counter-smoking ads, under the fairness regulation. If they had pulled out of Tv ads themselves (all brands). It would have looked suspicious, and made the news as to why. Congress gave them the excuse for doing it, by playing the “nanny”. A role it rarely does, with the concerned industries’ consent.
A tiny little data recorder (no GPS, so no “where you were going” data), in the more expensive models. Will save the makers millions in future legal hassles. Especially as such cases have apparently become the latest graze of attorneys, these days. They’ve got to eat too, ya know.
Hmmmn.
1) Idiots will drive regardless.
2) Insurance will NOT under any circumstance become cheaper.
3) Cars will cost lots more because of 50,000 different models of these “black Boxes” that should cost about five bucks apiece if standardized and mass produced.
4) The data provided by them will be as reliable as a politician’s promises in an election year.
5) Criminals will have these babies hacked in no time for those ironclad “swoop and squat” insurance claim scams.
6) There will other, as yet unforeseen, negative results as a result of widespread deployment of these high tech tattletales.
7) Life will not improve one whit because of them.
I think I’ve about summed it up.
# 45 A : Many states are drooling at the concept of applying road taxes based on usage. The more you drive, the more you pay.
Sorry. Since a huge portion of gasoline’s cost is “road taxes” aren’t we already paying based on usage?
Anyone who thinks this is a good idea is an asshole.
And I thought the problem with these Toyotas was the electronics?
So to make them safer we put in more… electronics?
Your cell phone is capable of all of that tracking stuff, and it has all of your calls too. And you pay the phone company to track you all of the time.
Re: #41, “I don’t believe you. Left turns at light controlled intersections could never have such a rule.”
Bobbo such a a weak argument, even for you. The rules may be different where you are, but there are so many accidents of the 2 types I described, that expedience is the rule here, and I suspect the same in other areas of the country.
Your little bump, where no damage was done, is hardly an example to illustrate laying of blame.
Bobbo,I found this link in about 5 seconds. Do your own search and prove me wrong.
http://www.wheels.ca/Auto%20Know/article/245084
# 53 GRtak,
Wow, I didn’t know my cell phone can validate someones clam they physical applied the brake yet the car still accelerates. That’s one smart phone!!
# 50 Sock it to me:
My understanding is that the idea is to apply a ‘surcharge’ to heavy users. And would like the idea of ticketing based on GPS data. Similar to electricity usage, you pay a base rate and then a 2nd tier price if your usage goes beyond that.
#54–Skeptic. I apologize.
This will also make me a better driver.
Thank you.
There’s an impostor posing as Bobbo!
(Someday I’ll tell you about the time I rear-ended a member of the Canadian Armed Forces.)
PS, Thanks.
Glenn E. said, on May 1st, 2010 at 9:49 pm
>>Kind of like how the cigarette makers lobbied Congress to have Tv ads removed.
Don’t you mean not removed?
From the WSJ: “The four “appointees have pronounced and disqualifying conflicts and biases arising from their active and zealous participation as paid expert witnesses for plaintiffs in lawsuits” that attempt to cripple or destroy the industry, the letter said.”
#45, there’s already a ‘pay-as-you-go’ tax system. Its called “The Gasoline Tax”. Its low-tech and reliable (no way to hack it or cheat). Don’t see how a black box would improve on this.