Imparting accurate knowledge is a dangerous thing in a place like a school and not to be tolerated. Obviously, the issue is a kid running across this definition during his daily regimen of perusing the dictionary will immediately think, “Hmmm. Have to give this a try.”

Dictionaries have been removed from classrooms in southern California schools after a parent complained about a child reading the definition for “oral sex”.

Merriam Webster’s 10th edition, which has been used for the past few years in fourth and fifth grade classrooms (for children aged nine to 10) in Menifee Union school district, has been pulled from shelves over fears that the “sexually graphic” entry is “just not age appropriate”, according to the area’s local paper.

The dictionary’s online definition of the term is “oral stimulation of the genitals”. “It’s hard to sit and read the dictionary, but we’ll be looking to find other things of a graphic nature,” district spokeswoman Betti Cadmus told the paper.

While some parents have praised the move – “[it’s] a prestigious dictionary that’s used in the Riverside County spelling bee, but I also imagine there are words in there of concern,” said Randy Freeman – others have raised concerns. “It is not such a bad thing for a kid to have the wherewithal to go and look up a word he may have even heard on the playground,” father Jason Rogers told local press. “You have to draw the line somewhere. What are they going to do next, pull encyclopaedias because they list parts of the human anatomy like the penis and vagina?”

Found by Brother Uncle Don.




  1. DavidtheDuke says:

    good thing those parents are concerned about the TRUE reason our schools are failing! Couldn’t have anything to do with the parents doing give a shit if a kid keeps good grades anymore…

  2. Dallas says:

    The word ‘oral’ by itself is starting to be very disturbing to many. Adults over 60 should not be saying that word in public.

  3. BobCat7 says:

    Yeah, good idea, just let the kids look up everything online. Wonder what kind of returns they will get when they put “oral sex” into google on Dad’s computer?

  4. nobodyspecial says:

    I’m picturing a group of trainee scribes in ancient Sumaria about 8000 years ago – as soon as they learn the cuniform for ‘women’ rushing to the clay tablets to look up the rude word.

    • Living Personification says:

      Yes…and it would appear to have not ever become less rude.
      I haven’t forgotten.

  5. Sparky_One says:

    “Dad’s computer?”
    Please, they can use the school’s library computer to look it up.

  6. JimD says:

    Heads Up Their ASS Parents !!! OOPS, can’t say ASS either !!!

  7. Uncle Dave says:

    #5: Get real. You mean on the computer in their bedroom or, more likely today, on their iPhone.

  8. Camacho says:

    Does the dictionary have entries for popular but derogatory terms for black or Jewish people?

  9. soundwash says:

    someone pinch me.. this the year 2010, -right?

    -s

  10. Pwuk says:

    Bloody hell! I thought it was used brits who were supposed to get irate about this sort of thing, what?

  11. Animby says:

    Gimme a break. Like there are fifth graders in California that don’t know what oral sex is? Haven’t they heard? Fifth graders have already moved on to anal. I wonder how long before Dirty Sanchez is in Merriam Webster?

  12. aj says:

    Wait.. Oral Sex is two words, not one. Certainly not a noun.
    In this context, oral is an adjective, changing the context of the verb sex. I’d have thrown the dictionary out too, if it can’t describe the English language properly! 😉

    Just like someone giving an oral speech. I think that term is slightly redundant, but certainly more preferable than an anal speech.

  13. ramuno says:

    The school district is not all of Southern California, but rather about 9000 students in the Antelope Valley high desert area.

    I always figured that mostly loony people like living in the desert. Then this makes sense.

  14. hwo says:

    Didn’t Eskimo parents used to lick their little baby’s vagina to calm her down? Puts perspective into the culture-and-prejudice argument no?

  15. nobodyspecial says:

    Quite impressed that there are Californian 5th graders that can read.

    And it is rather quaint that in a world where most 9-10 year olds have 2girls/1cup as the wallpaper on their iPhones – that they actually go to a paper dictionary to look up rude words

    • Living Personification says:

      You mean like “Sociology”? Or “misrepresentation”?

  16. eighthnote says:

    I think these “parents” should consider moving into a cave on a deserted island, and let the rest of the world get on with life.


0

Bad Behavior has blocked 7705 access attempts in the last 7 days.