So, the Playboy ethic was right?

Psychologist Christopher Ryan is out to defeat an archetypal figure in the mythology of monogamy. No, not prince charming; he’s after the widespread belief in a prehistoric hunter who would slay an antelope on the plains and heroically haul it back to his nuclear family.

You might wonder what this has to do with monogamy. Well, Ryan argues that in actuality the meat would have been shared with the entire tribe, because pre-agricultural societies shared everything — including sex. This is a key point he and co-author/wife Cacilda Jethá make in “Sex at Dawn,” which was released last year in hardcover and this month in paperback. Our hunting and gathering ancestors were nonmonogamous, they argue — the implication being that, biologically speaking, sexual exclusivity is unnatural.




  1. Skeptic says:

    Zero is not a number even though Wikipedia says so. It needs to be edited.

  2. bobbo, words have a meaning and a context says:

    #30–So What== Yes, such an outrageously retarded thought that I suspect we are being pimped. Either that, or its a Ph D in Education or Poly Sci.

    Pedro–will you give me odds?

  3. So what says:

    You forgot philosophy,, art history, and women’s studies.

  4. bobbo, words have a meaning and a context says:

    There’s a 14 minute debate now between Old McCain the truth teller and xxxx regarding the debt ceiling.

    Drinking Game: chug a cold one each time they talk past each other.

    I don’t think “debate” means what you think it means.

  5. bobbo, words have a meaning and a context says:

    Thats on C-Span 2. Opponent is Dick Durbin. He thinks the exchanges were “valuable.”

    Chug!!!!!!!

  6. Animby says:

    # 24 Dear Submissive:

    THREE WHOLE YEARS??? Wow! Congrats. I can see why you believe you’re an expert. Personally, I’d like you to check back in after year seven.

    “monogamy doesn’t work because they don’t follow the biblical model”

    Do you really believe someone who enters a marriage with a ripped hymen cannot be happy? Tell us, do you also only have sex for procreation? You stay celibate for three weeks out each four?

    “we both have Ph.D.’s.”
    For both of your sakes, I hope those letters don’t stand for Philandering Diddlers.

    Definition “religion” : a codified set of rules for everyday living that emphasizes the evil in anything fun or enjoyable.

    I’m a Bokononist and live by the foma.

  7. bobbo, words have a meaning and a context says:

    Bokonism shares so much with Scientology. Why isn’t it as popular? Too philosophical by comparison I’m thinking, or maybe too honest?

    No damn cat, no damn cradle. Deep thoughts.

    Say Animby–you really read that cry for help a bit too fast. I have to think they aren’t diddling anyone, that wouldn’t be very passive.

    More like the sheet of steel than the laser beam.

    Ha, ha.

  8. bobbo, words have a meaning and a context says:

    Well Pedro, your hypocrisy astounds me. Complaining of my turning a discussion about monogamy into the hogwash you say WHILE you turn the same discussion into your private allusion to sheeple.

    How many Ph D do you have? Please round off to the nearest whole integer.

    Ha, ha. Poor Pedro. VOTE ALL “NO NEW TAXES” POLITICIANS OUT OF OFFICE. HEAP SCORN ON ALL SHEEPLE AND SHEEPLE LOVING DONKEYS.

    Yea, verily.

  9. Uncle Patso says:

    I like the analogy of changing eye color — of course, many people do this via colored contact lenses. Much if not most social convention is like wearing contact lenses — something not exactly natural, but practiced every day by many many millions. And a few take it to the next level by, for example, wearing lenses of different colors depending on their mood.

    How much human behavior is really inherent in our genes and how much is like wearing contact lenses or “fashionable” clothes? We are only beginning to find out. How much is like language? All human societies have language; it is apparent that language is built into our brains, but they each have a _different_ language.

    I think the concept of private property should be listed as one of the Big Inventions along with agriculture and double-entry bookkeeping.

    It’s very difficult to be rational about sexuality, which evolved billions of years before intellect came along. Making much sense of something so primal takes lots of careful thought, along with willingness to abandon or at least question the “common wisdom.”

  10. Ah_Yea says:

    # 23 Animby,

    “STDs were almost unknown until the 15th century.”

    WOW! Of all the incredibly idiotic things you have said lately, this one is a whopper!

    “Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) have been known since antiquity: gonorrhoea was certainly described by the ancient Egyptians, and was recognized by Greek and Roman medical writers. … By the Middle Ages both gonorrhea and syphilis were widespread.”

    You certainly are the embodiment of “Ignorance is Bliss”

    http://answers.com/topic/sexually-transmitted-diseases-a-brief-history#ixzz1TipZourr

  11. So what says:

    #42 Good link, could have lived my entire life without the knowledge of the injecting his own penis though. Frakking ouch.

  12. deowll says:

    The last study I can recall looking at this in pygmy hunter gatherers had 1/3 monogamous, 1/3 practicing serial monogamy, and one third practiced casual sex.

    Large kills are normally shared with the group. Small kills often aren’t.

    Cheating spouses have traditionally had a rather high death rate.

  13. What? says:

    Zero is a value, if you don’t want it to be a number-then knock yourself out with that.

    B: the value of 1/x, as x approaches zero from any nonzero value, approaches infinity (very quickly). Look up “The Limit” on the WWW. This is a very powerful idea, useful in calculus.

    There are lots of infinities in math.

    The value of 1/x, as x approaches infinity from a value less than infinity, approaches zero.

  14. So what says:

    #46 and mathematicians wonder why people hate math.

  15. I read the book and found it very interesting but I am still living with my wife in monogamy.

  16. What? says:

    I don’t understand your remark at all. I have an engineering degree, and don’t understand the “difficult” theoretical maths. But, I can tell you math is more beautiful than any woman (or man, pick your poison).

    Math is so simple, so powerful at describing the world, and so extensible.

    It is only vulgar because many of its teachers make it that way to inflate their power.

    Fight the power.

  17. Ah_Yea says:

    So what,

    It seems the researcher who injected his own wang must have had a lot of zeal and very little common sense.

  18. Ah_Yea says:

    Pedro,

    “I’m tempted to give you my phone number so you can call me when you get the gift of self awareness”

    HAR!! Don’t wait up.

  19. Skeptic says:

    Re: “Zero is a value”

    0 is nothing more than a placeholder. Numbers that approach zero certainly have value, but 0 itself has no value. Otherwise, lend me $1000 and I’ll pay you $0 as often as you like (every billionth of a second is fine with me), until you are paid back. Deal?

  20. What? says:

    S: when stopped at a stoplight, your speed does not have a value of zero?

  21. What? says:

    When you take all the money out of your bank account, the value of your balance isn’t zero?

  22. What! says:

    As it says on the WWW, zero is to addition as one is to multiplication. You’re also arguing that one doesn’t exist in the context of multiplication?

    What about the identity matrix? It doesn’t exist?

    I may ne wrong, but infinity doesn’t seem possible without the value of zero.

    Q: What kind of skeptic isn’t curious enough to learn something on which to rest his argumentative lever? A: a contrarian.

    Should you change you name to Contrarian?

  23. Animby says:

    #42 = Ah_No. Maybe you are unfamiliar with the word “almost”. Yes, the diseases existed but the incidence was very low. Now, go away, and work your way through your first grade vocabulary lists.

    #52 Skeptic : Have you considered a career in Congress?

  24. So what says:

    #56 Not to be a stickler but how would anybody know how prevalent STD’s were in Egypt 2000 years ago? Do the hieroglyphics show a drippy wang or something?

  25. bobbo, words have a meaning and a context says:

    #46–What==”as x approaches zero….” /// I like that explanation, it makes sense, but then as a kiddie I was also taught that infinity was “kinda” undefined or unknowable or perplexing as well.

    Are numbers best understood as they approach values, or best understood all on their own?

    Is there a difference between zero and null?

    If Pedro had 3 PhD’s wouldn’t their value unparadoxically be zero?

    Thinking more on the subject, if we aren’t being pimped, I think those PhD’s from Submissive must be divinity degrees? I think those aren’t really PhD’s, but in the way the religious do, they get transubstantiated into real meat, but with a caloric value of zero. Yes, do such degrees have a value of zero or do they only approach zero?

    …..and so it goes……

  26. What? says:

    B: I don’t have an answer. It depends on where you are going: are you reaching a fixed destination, or, is it enough to know what direction you’re going? As x goes to infinity, cosine of x varies between -1 and 1. There is no final resting point.

    The value infinity seems both a direction and a destination, as one can say infinity+1, or infinity-1, and it is easily to pick out which of the two is larger.

    (x^3)/(x^2) goes to infinity, as x goes to infinity

    (x^2)/(x^3) goes to zero, as x goes to infinity

    I don’t remember enough to say what zero/zero is.

    More women in my life equals more pain, that is for sure, and the cost grows at a greater rate than the benifits.

  27. So what says:

    @58 Bobbo, I had not thought of divinity studies it would explain some things. I still lean towards women’s studies or art history.

  28. Animby says:

    #58 – Bobbo – Divinity? I hadn’t considered that. Good call. And a chuckle. Divinity derives from divine and diviners often work with a forked stick. Wonder if they also work with a forked tongue? A forked tongue in the bedroom could be a very interesting experience. Maybe that’s why they are still monogamous after three whole years!

    # 57 So what said,”Do the hieroglyphics show a drippy wang or something?” That’s not be a stickler. It’s a fair question. I am a member of the Amer.Assoc of Anthropology and have studied a bit of medical anthropology. But I haven’t really studied this question; so my answer is speculation. Some STDs cause physical effects on the body that can be detected in skeletons. Chiefly among these are syphilis which can cause observable effects in the primary AND their offspring. I can’t point to a specific hieroglyph but you might be surprised. I had the pleasure of working in Cairo and spent a lot of time exploring in the museum and the monuments. I remember seeing one panel that depicted the use of tampons as birth control, another that depicted a pharaoh that suffered from impotence and several that showed physicians concocting treatments for what are assumed to be STDs. The pictures are not graphic, it’s the accompany text that explains the images. I don’t read hieroglyphs so these were explained to me. The incidence, however, has to be derived from physical remains. Physicians in ancient Greece and Rome, however kept pretty specific records. The Romans treated everything from cold sores to “indecent disease” usually only seen in prostitutes. But they seem to have missed the fact that the problems were transmitted by sexual activity.

    Sorry I can’t be more specific but my anthropology work has been in birthing customs not venereal diseases.

  29. foobar says:

    Zero can be used as a number and as a value. Unless you’re playing roulette of course, so all bets are off. Or 35-1 straight up.

    Women always know the odds, men just guess.

  30. JimD says:

    Monogamy was invented to establish PROPERTY RIGHTS !!! When civilization arose, the rights of ownership to property had to be established and protected, so “Legitimacy” and “Ill-Legitimacy” were defined, along with rights of succession. Marriage was all about PROPERTY – REAL ESTATE, AND HUMAN CAPITAL – WIVES AND CHILDREN AND SLAVES !!! We have yet to emerge from that “Ownership” Paradigm …


2

Bad Behavior has blocked 7147 access attempts in the last 7 days.