Assuming that you lived in Iowa and were a registered Republican, after 146 debates and somewhere around 674 million interviews with the candidates, you should have a vague idea of who and what the candidates are about. So, who would you vote for in Tuesday’s caucus?
Define: “agnostic atheist”: someone who lacks courage for his convictions.
Proof: you never hear of an agnostic unicorn non believer.
Dvorak readers are solidly for Paul (~75% at the moment). Guess we know which way most of us swing.
Swing or sink?
“You Know”: presnedents are not supposed to be selected on the basis of beauty, popularity, sharing a beer with, independent thinking or any of the various criteria offered up as you do.
“How will they govern?” 3-4 good ideas that require congress and the court to support turn out to be not such good ideas.
If you weren’t a reptile yourself, you should have figured that out for yourself by now. Instead you have to be told. Given Paul or any other simple minded hypocritical dogmatist won’t get into office to prove to you what is all but self evident, you will continue in your larval stage until some morph takes place.
Why are there so few “old” libertarians–I mean not the old guys grasping at the ring under cover of libertarianism?
Silly Hoomans.
How dare you insult unicorns.
The real question is, based on the picture above, which of the candidates are actually reptilian?
My guess:
Romney
Gingrich
Backman
I like Bachman’s serial killer eyes.
If a sizable portion of the undecided’s go for Paul, it may indicate a new world has rendered turned all conventional wisdom on its ear.
Everyone saying Paul can’t be elected love the status quo, but as Paul points out, the people do not love the status quo….
Paul is mainstream….his positions are those of many people…but now they must overcome the propaganda he can’t be elected…he certainly can, easily.
The recent scrutiny has revealed a loony side that is a showstopper which I can now see why you like him.
He’s the next Ralph Nader and will amount to merely being a footnote.
So did you get your $500 back from the Herman Cain campaign?
And he too is for the continuance of hypocrisy.
Just he sells kool-aid like the O did in 2008.
And people are thirsty and ignorant at the same time.
Cursor_
I think the least loon at this point is Huntsman but the Teapublican sheeple aren’t interested.
Lately Huntsman has been leaning “loonie” in order to remain relevant.
He’s dead last
Paul is too extreme even for most Republicans.
There is no way Paul can stand up to Obama during a national debate. He can rant and rave about all the government programs all he wants. All Obama need do is remind the voters that these programs are what We the People wanted.
We want clean water, EPA.
We want drugs that work and don’t kill us, FDA.
We want a part of this nation, National Parks system.
We want stability in the financial sector, FDIC.
We want a safety net, Food stamps.
We want someone there in a disaster, FEMA.
So which programs will Paul cut again?
He’s leading Iowa. What an eminence you are
3rd is not 1st with 47% in
Romney 25%
Santorum 24%
Paul 22%
http://tinyurl.com/776vdny
Sorry
Santorum 25
Romeny 24
Paul 22
At the time I posted, Paul was leading
Google has it 24 24 22
Romney, Santorum, Paul
Wow pedro posting a lead with one half of one percent of the results. Do you moonlight as an NBC political analyst.
Me? I only saw the numbers once. You came here and became the GOP spokesman.
I was bored, after your comments, still bored.
That’s easy: Get a life, hahahahahahaha
So What nailed it. pedro eats it.
And who said loser for you to show up?
Oh ffs make Newt Gingrich disappear. I don’t believe in violence so I guess I can’t hope he gets run over by a truck
The choices are incomplete: they can also caucus for Obama. I wouldn’t vote for any of these clowns.
DVORAK!!!
My internet connection is a bot slow, today. Now I’m not a programmer so I’m not sure of the terminology but the page stopped loading with all the information there but missing most of the formatting. Guess what I saw: All the primary comments were numbered! Replies to comments were still nested and unnumbered and marked with bullets. All this complaining and bitching and it seems you had the ability to solve half the problem with the new format with practically no effort at all! Damn, JCD, Give us a break!
Give it up already…
If I voted in Iowa the FBI would arrest me but I would definitely take a deep drink of that corn ethanol from the hybrid tractor and vote for Ronnie. He shoots straight, in the dark.
You left out the most obvious response to your poll – NONE OF THE ABOVE NITWITS !!!
each and every one of them are batcrap crazy, and shouldn’t even be a dog catcher, let alone President.
They can’t be worse than Dumbya & Obama, can they?
“Who would you vote for in Iowa?” is as moronic a question as “Which farm implement would you use to voluntarily crush your own balls?”
Welcome to New America, where you are always offered a “choice”.
Which corrupt retard in a necktie would YOU select for your “leader”?